Far better would be limiting demand for high - emissions crude oil sources,
through global carbon taxes.
In summary, then, the best available models indicate that 1) global warming is a problem that is expected to have only a limited impact on the world economy and 2) it is economically rational only to reduce slightly this marginal impact
through global carbon taxes.
In the 21st century, the eugenics movement has changed its stripes once again, manifesting
itself through the global carbon tax agenda and the notion that having too many children or enjoying a reasonably high standard of living is destroying the planet through global warming, creating the pretext for further regulation and control over every facet of our lives.
Not exact matches
In the study, Monier and his co-authors applied the IGSM framework to assess climate impacts under different climate - change scenarios — «Paris Forever,» a scenario in which Paris Agreement pledges are carried out
through 2030, and then maintained at that level
through 2100; and «2C,» a scenario with a
global carbon tax - driven emissions reduction policy designed to cap
global warming at 2 degrees Celsius by 2100.
As scientists have accumulated evidence for
global warming and its possible consequences, so the scientific and political consensus has favoured attempts at reducing
carbon emissions
through taxes and regulations and subsidies, many of them directed at factories and motor - cars.
Through taxing carbon and eliminating fossil subsidies, trillions of dollars can be freed for building the
global clean energy infrastructure of tomorrow.