The principles of the science of theology are given in the articles of the Creed and in Sacred Scripture and they are known by us through faith, not
through philosophical reasoning: you can not, by unaided reason, conclude that the doctrine of the Trinity is true, for example.
Not exact matches
But instead of a religion revealed
through philosophical constructs — easily
reasoned out and understood, instead we get a God inconveniently revealed in people, and food and wine and water and bodies and pies and oil and beer.
Now for Hegel, as for most of the philosophers of the tradition, the end of
philosophical speculation is the attainment of truth (usually taken in some absolutist sense), and we reach such truth
through the proper employment of
reason.
Apologetics, in its attempt to defend the factual claims of the Bible
through the use of
reason, thus implicitly affirms the very
philosophical outlook that undermines its own project, placing the truth of Christianity in the realm of rational reflection and thus into the realm of reasonable doubt and provisionality.»
Yet we reiterate that throughout the earlier period in question — from 1935, say, to 1960 — a few theologians such as Canon Raven in England had continued along the lines laid down in the twenties, while Professor Hartshorne and some others in the United States (notably E. E. Harris, in such books as Revelation
Through Reason) were carrying on the work on the strictly
philosophical side.
The two schools of
philosophical thought represented on this occasion were Epicureanism and Stoicism: the former, discounting
reason and advancing pleasure
through experience, or self - satisfaction at the highest and noblest human level, as the true impetus for living; and the latter, exalting human indifference, or submission to the exigencies of existence
through rigid self - discipline, treating with sublime disregard good fortune and bad fortune alike.