Sentences with phrase «through radiative energy»

Web said,» There only way that the earth can exchange energy with the external system is through radiative energy transfer.»

Not exact matches

Using global climate models and NASA satellite observations of Earth's energy budget from the last 15 years, the study finds that a warming Earth is able to restore its temperature equilibrium through complex and seemingly paradoxical changes in the atmosphere and the way radiative heat is transported.

«Fire is losing heat through radiative and convective heat transfer and it is gaining heat as energy is produced as a result of combustion, so it is an energy balance problem.

A vast array of thought has been brought to bear on this problem, beginning with Arrhenius» simple energy balance calculation, continuing through Manabe's one - dimensional radiative - convective models in the 1960's, and culminating in today's comprehensive atmosphere - ocean general circulation models.

Their observed height and mixing ability is a result of radiative characteristics supplementing the energy they acquire from the surface and that additional energy being diffused through the whole atmosphere by collisional activity.

ii) The real question is whether changes in radiative characteristics alone can result in energy being transferred from the radiative SDL to the mechanical AAL so as to add to the energy in that latterLoop and thereby significantly increase the temperature of atmosphere and surface by in turn increasing the time delay in the transmission of energy through the system.

There is a small effect from the radiative properties of the «GHG's», but they simply act as a sort of hybrid thermal / optical delay line which delays the flow of any single photon through the Sun / Earth / Atmosphere / Universe system by causing it to make multiple «bounces» through the system: surface / GHG / surface / GHG / escape to the energy free void of space.

Jim Cripwell: «The problem I have understanding this, is that radiative transfer models seem to only look at the transfer of energy through the atmosphere, by radiation.

So when the radiative channel over the ocean is restricted instead of temperature rising in response to get the same amount of energy through the restriciton evaporation rises instead.

The problem I have understanding this, is that radiative transfer models seem to only look at the transfer of energy through the atmosphere, by radiation.

Research published in 2008 by Arizona State University professor Peter Crozier suggests that this nanoscale atmospheric aerosol species is abundant in the atmosphere over East Asian countries and should be explicitly included in models of radiative forcing (the gap between energy radiation reaching the Earth and that leaving through the upper atmosphere).

Energy loss at altitude only occurs through IR radiation to space from radiative gases, mainly H2O.

If the radiative channel becomes more restricted by rising CO2 evaporation can increase instead of temperature in response to get more thermal energy through the troposphere.

As a result, if one layer absorbs extra energy through radiative properties, this layer could in theory become more energetic than the surrounding layers, e.g., «tropospheric warming».

The consequent circulatory changes alter the rate of non radiative energy flow through the system to neutralise the thermal effect of whatever forcing element was trying to destabilise the system in the first place.

I haven't a clue why you have served me up this garbled explanation — «kinetic energy aka heat», «average kinetic energy, aka temperature», «The energy flow through the atmosphere hasn't changed one bit, but radiative energy has been converted to kinetic energy.

If the surface doesn't warm first (from the increased radiative forcing, 0.7 W / m ^ 2), it means the proposed mechanism through which it causes energy to slowly build in the bulk below simply isn't observed to work.

In other words, the reduced radiative energy flux must be compensated through increased temperatures or altered latent / sensible heat fluxes.

Best estimates of the main energy components involved in radiative transfer and energy flows through the climate system do not satisfy physical constraints for conservation of energy without adjustments.