Not exact matches
Thus our constitutional jurisprudence abhors blatant
breaches of the 1992
Constitution and anybody found to have
breached any provision
of the
Constitution can not be blessed with such Awards like the one GJA conferred on Anas Aremeyaw Anas.
«The failure
of lNEC to conduct the re-run elections in Rivers within the time - frame ordered by the respective election petition tribunals / courts is in
breach of the Electoral Act and Section 76
of the 1999
Constitution,
thus endangering the nation's democracy.
Date — Bah JSC in this case stated that: «what is intended to be covered by Order 81 are irregularities, short
of situations
of want
of jurisdiction or infringements
of statutes other than the High Court Rules...
thus, whilst Order 81 rule 1 treats non compliance with the Rules as not nullifying the non - complying proceedings, the rule DOES NOT apply to non — compliance which is so fundamental as to go to Jurisdiction, or which is in
breach of a Statute other than the civil procedure rules;
breach of the
Constitution; or the
breach of the rules
of natural justice.»
In Campbell v Attorneys - General & The Nisga'a Nation, [79] the terms
of a treaty which gave legislative (and
thus law - making) power to the Nisga'a people in relation to education, the preservation
of their culture and the use
of their land and resource were challenged as a
breach of the Canadian
Constitution.