Then, increased winter precipitation in the mid-latitudes will ice up the winters,
thus increasing albedo, plunging us 8 degrees C. over the span of a few decades, as it would appear to have happened in one of the last ice ages.
Not exact matches
They tend to believe that as the planet warms, low - level cloud cover will
increase,
thus increasing planetary
albedo (overall reflectiveness of the Earth), offsetting the
increased greenhouse effect and preventing a dangerous level of global warming from occurring.
The famous «255 K» value for no greenhouse effect on Earth is an example of this, although in reality if we got that cold you would expect a snowball - like Earth and a much higher
albedo from the
increased brightness of the surface... and
thus the «no - greenhouse temperature» would be even colder than 255 K.
However, this warming eventually leads to additional cloud formation which leads to
increased albedo -
thus cooler temps.
If not either the CO2 / temp relationship is wrong [I do not think so] or the effect of the CO2 rise is being variably effected by negative feedbacks such as
increased cloud formation and
albedo thus offsetting the CO2 related temperature rise.
Water vapour is not only a highly potent GHG but it
increase has also recently been shown to have a serious potential for reducing cloud formation in the tropics and
thus advancing
Albedo Loss.
As the planet warms,
increasing levels of water vapour in the atmosphere caused by higher evaporation levels form more clouds and snow
increasing the
albedo of the planet, reflecting heat back into space more efficiently,
thus working to regulate the temperature downward.
A slight change of ocean temperature (after a delay caused by the high specific heat of water, the annual mixing of thermocline waters with deeper waters in storms) ensures that rising CO2 reduces infrared absorbing H2O vapour while slightly
increasing cloud cover (
thus Earth's
albedo), as evidenced by the fact that the NOAA data from 1948 - 2008 shows a fall in global humidity (not the positive feedback rise presumed by NASA's models!)
An aside: one of the reasons that clouds modulate temperature so effectively is not just the
albedo increase which bounces downwelling short wave radiation back into space, but because they radiate IR back to the surface
thus reducing the net rate of thermal radiative loss.»
An aside: one of the reasons that clouds modulate temperature so effectively is not just the
albedo increase which bounces dowelling short wave radiation back into space, but because they radiate IR back to the surface
thus reducing the net rate of thermal radiative loss.
By pushing large amounts of soot into the atmosphere, we will be
increasing the planet's
albedo and
thus helping fight global warming.
2) We have
INCREASING POSITIVE feedback effects from (a) melting tundra, (b) melting melting hydrates in the oceans, (c) lower reflectivity (
albedo) of the Arctic itself, not to mention its next door neighbor Greenland, (d)
increased fires in northern Asia and North America which will further exacerbate
albedo, (e) LESS ICE AREA to reflect sun in the Arctic... and
thus allow that nice dark water to absorb more and more sun.
Or what if stronger tides
increased glacial flow or calving at the coasts, or tidal currents openned up gaps in sea ice covering by piling sea ice against islands,
thus affecting
albedo and surface heat fluxes?
Thus, there is a positive feedback between warming, snow aging,
increased solar absorption, and reduced
albedo.