The 2014 White et al study finds that this is consistent with global
tidal gauge measurements.
I realize that
tidal gauge measurements for assessing sea level rise has met with some skepticism because of multiple measurement issues including tides, ground water pumping and subsidence, tectonic plate movement, glacial rebound, etc..
Not exact matches
Seems quite a bit easier to go with the
tidal gauge record; it has its complications, but at least you are starting with reasonably direct
measurements of sea level.
Remarkably, it seems that their main justification for applying the adjustments has been that they make their estimates better match the
tidal gauge estimates, even though the reason why the satellite
measurements were being carried out was because the
tidal gauge estimates were unreliable!