Sentences with phrase «time and space seem»

With an inimitable touch and shimmering layers of bold color where time and space seem to mingle and collide, Yu Yasuda depicts dream - like landscapes and a fluid, painterly world liberated from existing notions of space and time.

Meyohas integrates an infinity mirror, a device she's employed throughout her practice, as an infinite call and response where the boundaries of time and space seem unending.

An older metaphysic spoke about God as so much a supraterrestrial, unconditioned, and unrelated «being» or «ultimate reality» that it made the world of time and space seem unreal and unimportant.

But its marrying of a location and a sense of time and space seems more predictive of his later masterpiece The River (1951), a reflective drama following an isolated British family living on the banks of the Ganges in India, than it does anything that came out of Italy in the aftermath of World War Two.

Not exact matches

Every time one of his companies stumbles, the entrepreneur seems to have another spectacular idea to announce — a Martian colony, a space - based internet or an 800 - mph transit system — to thrill and confuse.

«Every time one of his companies stumbles, Musk seems to have another spectacular thing to announce — a new mode of transportation, the space internet, or a Martian colony — to thrill and confuse,» Vance writes.

Late 19th - century Americans loved railroads, which seemed to eradicate time and space, moving goods and people more cheaply and more conveniently than ever before.

«Once you've got real - time coverage of the entire globe from space, you start to get data sets that seem like science fiction -; data sets of the kind that were formerly available only to the NSA, and only in theory,» he continued.

From the comfort of your couch, you can explore Middle Earth or travel through space and time in a phone booth, making stress from daily life seem far away.

According to the Oxford Times, she wrote in a newsletter: «I am not usually a grumpy person but I have been overwhelmed by the numbers of tourists coming through the church and the fact that so many of them seem unaware that this is a sacred space.

These instances seem to raise an issue of whether the datum from which abstraction is made — concrete passage — is not different in kind from the three successive abstractions: space - time, its derivative set of time - systems, and a single member of this derivative set serving in the activity of natural measurement.

Whiteheadians seem able to imagine such ecstatically spanned unities - across - time on the so - called «microscopic» scale of the «specious present,» but give up on the idea as the scope of the temporal disclosure space is widened to the scale of human lifetime and of generations.7 But worse than this from the point of view of Heidegger's temporal problematic, by submitting the ecstatic unities of their «specious presents» to the before / after ordering and metric properties of linear time, at least in terms of their mutually external relations and arrangements, they give back ontologically every advantage they gained from the use of an cc - static - temporal disclosure horizon in the first place, even though it was only the single horizon of presence.

It seems almost unthinkable, apparently, to such people that these ancient Hebrew texts could have been written without a passionate interest in the physical relationships of space and time.

At first sight, beings and their destinies might seem to us to be scattered haphazard or at least in an arbitrary fashion over the face of the earth; we could very easily suppose that each of us might equally well have been born earlier or later, at this place or that, happier or more ill - starred, as though the universe from the beginning to end of its history formed in space - time a sort of vast flower - bed in which the flowers could be changed about at the whim of the gardener.

«The term can refer to theological accounts of the world as God's creation; or to philosophical reflection on the categories of space and time; or to observational and theoretical study of the structure and evolution of the physical universe; or, finally, to «world views»: unified imaginative perceptions of how the world seems and where we stand in it» (Tracy and Lash, vii).

Space and time have seemed both continuous and discontinuous from Zeno's paradoxes up to current debates about the reality of electrons and photons: are they (continuous) waves or (discrete) particles?

Seems like it'd be easier to narrow things down if these people understood space and time.

Our best theory of space and time — general relativity — seems inconsistent with quantum mechanics.

There would seem to be four ways in which societies interrelate space and time in their systems of meaning: moving - time, fixed - time, moving - space, and fixed - space.

To deny that would seem to suggest that the actual entity need not be extensive at all, or that it might float loose from its locus in time and space, or that it might expand or contract, and it has never occurred to me to affirm anything of that sort.

An interrogative: If all is relative, And truth (like time and space) Has no fixed thought or place Where God has said, «Be still,» Why can't I simply will That truth be as it seems In all my ego - schemAnd truth (like time and space) Has no fixed thought or place Where God has said, «Be still,» Why can't I simply will That truth be as it seems In all my ego - schemand space) Has no fixed thought or place Where God has said, «Be still,» Why can't I simply will That truth be as it seems In all my ego - schemes?

Existentialist theologians, for example, seem to forget entirely that human existence, about which they talk so much, has a location in time and space and in a given part of the natural order.

Einstein's seeming overthrow of absolute space and time is often taken as justifying «relativism,» the idea that nothing is absolute.

Everything about our world today seems hell bent on pulling us away from fully occupying the time and space God has, in His wisdom, confined us to.

The majority of popular Christian Web sites seems to be lost in the digital ether, with no sense of their own location in religious time and space.

But the majority of popular Christian Web sites seems to be lost in the digital ether, with no sense of their own location in religious time and space.

-- The main differentiation between atheists and religious, seems to be perception — The perception of space and time — and how they describe what they have seen in a small picture, or big picture venue --

And what can this mean except that, like those planetary orbits which seem to traverse our solar system without remaining within it, the curve of consciousness, pursuing its course of growing complexity, will break through the material framework of Time and Space to escape somewhere towards an ultra-center of unification and wholeness, where there will finally be assembled, and in detail, everything that is irreplaceable and incommunicable in the worAnd what can this mean except that, like those planetary orbits which seem to traverse our solar system without remaining within it, the curve of consciousness, pursuing its course of growing complexity, will break through the material framework of Time and Space to escape somewhere towards an ultra-center of unification and wholeness, where there will finally be assembled, and in detail, everything that is irreplaceable and incommunicable in the worand Space to escape somewhere towards an ultra-center of unification and wholeness, where there will finally be assembled, and in detail, everything that is irreplaceable and incommunicable in the worand wholeness, where there will finally be assembled, and in detail, everything that is irreplaceable and incommunicable in the worand in detail, everything that is irreplaceable and incommunicable in the worand incommunicable in the world.

But to me it seems that the Spirit of God is at work at least in Wendy and so I choose to give her the benefit of doubt and also the space and time she needs.

Unless, as seems infinitely improbable, we are destined by contact with other thinking planets, across the abysses of space and time, some day to become integrated within an organized complex composed of a number of Noospheres, humanity, having reached maturity, will remain alone, face to face with itself.

In their scramble to free mothers from the demons of» domesticity, Douglas and Michaels seem unwilling to acknowledge the value of parents intentionally creating family space and time and rituals that nurture children.

On the one hand the overwhelming vastness of the Cosmos need no longer appall us, since the indefinite layers of Time and Space, far from being the lifeless desert in which we seemed to be lost, show themselves to be the bosom which gathers together the separate fragments of a huge Consciousness in process of growth.

At present all I am trying to do is to get space and time from concepts that seem roughly along the right lines.

CC: I agree, but if one is talking about how things go on, you seem to have a conflict between two ways of looking at it: one is starting from organisms and working down and the other is starting from space - time and working up.

Maybe if I just knew my self, who I am, then I could have the possibility of knowing someone else, and in turn make the isolation of «Just my Opinion» seem less lonely, in All Space and Time.

All Space and Time, hmmmm, seems pretty vast.

For Newton, absolute space and absolute time are presupposed by a theory of the dynamics of moving bodies and in particular are necessitated by the fact that no available physical frame of reference seems suitable for a satisfactory analysis of the accelerated motions of material objects.

For Whitehead, a uniform and independent metric structure is presupposed by measurement in the space - time continuum and in particular is necessitated by any attempt, so it seems to Whitehead, to establish standard conditions or to introduce correction factors ensuring the self - congruence of measuring devices under transport.

This is due to the fact that the properties of space and time are, or at least appear to us, quite similar and, furthermore, that the spatial relations seem to us as somehow more fundamental, more solid, and easier to grasp than the elusive temporal relations.

Whitehead's point here seems weaker than the one he made in «Space, Time, and Relativity» in which he argued that location in space and location in time both embody and perhaps necessitate a judgment of externality (OT 197 = AE 237 = ISSpace, Time, and Relativity» in which he argued that location in space and location in time both embody and perhaps necessitate a judgment of externality (OT 197 = AE 237 = IS Time, and Relativity» in which he argued that location in space and location in time both embody and perhaps necessitate a judgment of externality (OT 197 = AE 237 = ISspace and location in time both embody and perhaps necessitate a judgment of externality (OT 197 = AE 237 = IS time both embody and perhaps necessitate a judgment of externality (OT 197 = AE 237 = IS 94).

Neither his relational conception of space, which is basic for understanding his concept of extensive abstraction and which gave his theory of relativity its unique character, nor the problem of the bifurcation of nature, with its differentiation between the materialistic and personalistic outlook on the world, seem to be clearly in Whitehead's mind at this time.

They seem fond of contemplating the vastness of space and time, but incapable of admitting that there is a lot of real estate to cover in the quest for the divine: spatially as well as temporally.

In his relations with other people, he can act from the dictates of his own conscience; at its highest the relationship of love can be elevated to a degree of complete service and good will which seems to transcend the space - time continuum.

You always seem to find that balance, given the time and space needed to sort through it all.

Iwobi recked my head last night he was weak and misplaced many passes he cant seem to control the ball its always running away from him he should not be in the middle in the middle you need good ball controllers with good eyes for passes long and short on the ground and above the ground >> > waterford yesterday were on top of us with no space giving to our players and we were scattered all over the place with no vision or leader ship too goals in the space of 3 minuets ok the first goal was a fluke but come on the second one???? and thats all what it takes to loose a match many times this season we cant play when the opposition seats in our face we have no cohesion or understanding we crumble away we need to start the game together as a unit a compact unit

He had to work hard to find space as Switzerland had a man on him at all times and he just didn't seem natural at playing the game from so deep.

I don't know how he gets into space because on the pitch you think someone will get close to him but he always seems to have time and space.»

I thought people here were debating about two or three seasons back why he should be our top striker.When I thought the Monaco match was the icing on the cake to show how average he was it seems just like Wenger we» will never learn our lesson.Now people our okay with him being a super sub which is debatable.Giroud was a super sub in games last season because he wasn't played when he was supposed to.He's not your ideal super sub because he very hardly creates but rather requires people to create for him.Most of the time super subs are the one's who tend to create the chances and open up spaces in the opposition defence.West ham are ready to pay and hence we should demand more from them.We can then use the money from his sale on far better players.Given the same seasons, time and chances a lot of average strikers can do better than what he did.This is because Arsenal create a lot of chances and it just needs someone who can finish.Goodbye!.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Where Klopp used half time to show his players where Arsenal was leaving the big spaces (behind Bellerin and Monreal) Wenger seemed to not have made any effective adjustments.