Sentences with phrase «time arguing over»

For example, it's far from trivial to spend a long time arguing over a sofa or a plate.

With such a nice selection of different experiences to dive into, stop wasting time arguing over which one is the «best».

Now the bad news: They'll spend some of that extra time arguing over money.

We spend far too much time arguing over the symptoms of our education system's failure rather than working together to fix its causes.

Now that there are so many cool and unique playgrounds designed for kids of all ages and abilities, I guarantee that you will spend less time arguing over tablets and more time debating which park to visit next.

Where has all this money gone to, and why are we wasting time arguing over 500k, when yes, we could potentially lose the player over penny pinching, as we have done more times than I care to think of, losing club transforming players to other clubs while Wenger is arguing over tuppence, and we aren't spending the time bringing in players which the club desperately needs to compete.

The best part of all this discourse is that it serves as undeniable proof that God does exist and He created you all; if you truly believed that there is no need to worship God because He is a made up piece of fiction, would you actually spend this much time arguing over some ridiculous fallacy?

More importantly, is it really productive to spend so much time arguing over the definitions of the Gospel and evangelicalism when the true test is in how we live our lives?

Not exact matches

Still, some have argued (in court) that the degree of risk isn't adequately communicated, and crowdfunding companies have taken steps to better communicate that uncertainty over time.

In it, the Harvard psychology professors argues that people have become more humane over time.

Larson once presided over cases in Riverside, and Pym argued cases in Larson's courtroom several times as a prosecutor while Larson was a judge, he said.

While Mathew Ingram over at GigaOm has argued that people have always found ways to distract themselves and waste time, perhaps by watching television, the reality is they've never had this sort of fire hose effect before.

«I spent a lot of time arguing that financial firms can be profitable and strong without raking their customers over the coals,» Cherny says.

«We argue the strong value proposition of paid streaming services will drive penetration higher over time,» he said.

Proponents of the increase in block size argued that the increase in technology over time would mitigate these necessary increases in computing power and network capabilities of those who wished to run a full node.

I mean, people have often argued that small - cap stocks do better over long periods of time just because they're small.

The solution, it is widely argued, is to cut benefits — either directly by means - testing or indirectly by raising the retirement age or allowing inflation to erode their real value over time.

We questioned the downward profile of this adjustment, arguing that risks / uncertainties increase over time rather than decline and that larger and increasing adjustments for risk should have been made.

The wireless company argued there is plenty of competition from content companies such as Disney and new media powerhouses like Google and Netflix that would counterbalance its influence if it were to take over a content shop like Time Warner.

At the same time, many argue the OPEC cuts still need to be extended because a $ 60 price signal will spur more shale drilling, putting downward pressure on the market all over again.

As an aside to this, we have argued in the past that the premium of BTC over BCH should shrink over time; as long as BCH offers lower transaction costs and faster transfer speeds, we believe this trend should continue (or rather resume).

My recollection is by this point in the book he'd had to substitute a proxy scaled market, and argue for the applicability of the measures over short time scales, so this suggests to me a major re-jig of my portfolio would be premature.

A principal purpose of this paper is to argue that the appropriate regime will differ between countries and perhaps also over time — there are no simple rules and no easy solutions.

On March 16, Uber countered that it should be not party to the lawsuit and instead argued that it would request that Waymo seek binding arbitration with Levandowski over the matter since those were conditions of his employment contract with Google at the time.

In what follows, I'm going to argue that if they can, then as markets develop and adapt over time, those excess returns should fall.

As we have argued in the past, the risks associated with economic and fiscal forecasting increase over time.

Arguing in a vacuum over what Jesus would do in 2012 using a 2000 - year - old text is an academic waste of time and an outrage to those who are actually sick and dying right now, even if it is not completely irrelevant.

As Kugel argues, this makes the community of interpretation over time more important than the text being interpreted.

Arguing about why shit happens only diverts time and energy away from the thing all people of good will, regardless of their faith or nonfaith, should be concerned with, the thing all of us have some control over: what happens after shit happens.

The religious always seem to have time to argue over the facts but never seem to have any facts of their own to share...

One can argue that it didn't happen at the same time, but that over millions of years these mutations developed independently and fell into place on their own... but I see no evolutionary advantage of having wiring without sensors or processing, or sensors without wiring or processing, or processing without sensors and wiring.

A few days later I traveled over a different West Bank road, this time from Jerusalem to Latrun, a journey taken to gain perspective on the terrain over which so many previous battles have been fought and where future boundary lines may some day be argued.

Dana, I don't NEED to spend my time here on this board arguing over con law, either, but the 1st Amendment protects my ability to do it.

Lots of people will argue that it will be impossible to judge performance over time — and it may take a while before the markets will adjust to a new, more rational management approach — but we must take the risk and move in that direction.

That was written in a time when it was true, before Christians argued over how many angels can fit on the head of a pin, whether to use grape juiceor wine in the communion class, and whether women should wear doilies on their head when they pray, and a myriad of other stupid destructive timewasting ideologies designed to keep us running around with 1 foot nailed to the floor.

To do this, he argues, is to disvalue the unique ontological status of societies, especially human communities, as durational unities achieved through collective effort over time.

Over at The American Conservative, Larison uses the NY Times / CBS News poll to argue that the Tea Partiers aren't populists but rather «base» conservatives.

In a footnote Griffin argues that my argument for this is unsound, because I «downplay the extent to which, over time, even very small deviations from the divine aims would lead to enormous gaps between the actual and what would have been ideal in an abstract sense.»

Most important, Taylor argues, «the practice of execution is a terrorizing tactic that over time creates illegitimate state power»; the eventual result is a corrupt and undemocratic political system — in fact, what else can you expect when you give the government absolute power over life and death?

Ask the owner to do this instead of a mosque just for one religions culture.How a community of Americans with different ideas and religions can come together and voice their beliefs and why it is so.Support America its time we all get together on one page.Stop the hatreds and misunderstandings of one another.This would be not only a great time for it but a place such as a United Understanding of Religions building could surface.Now that would be a great way of continuing on after 9 - 11or... we can fight argue and fuss over things we understand not, with no one stepping up to find common ground.Which is it going to be?Hate or understanding?You have the moment, seize it for humanity.Not just one peoples.

Guns are very effective deterrents, and given that 99.9996 % of gun owners don't go out and kill anyone with guns (that's, 35000 murders (assuming one murder per gun owner, which is a generous number, divided by 100m gun owners, which own about 270m guns in the US), it's mind numbingly stupid to argue that GUNS are the problem, or that even legal gun owners are the problem, when you're more likely to get run over by a car (and 13 times more likely to just die of cancer).

Furthermore, in the United States, for over a quarter of a century the writings of Professor Charles Hartshorne, including Beyond Humanism, The Vision of God, Reality as Social Process, The Divine Relativity, The Logic of Perfection, and A Natural Theology for Our Times, as well as many occasional articles and essays, have eloquently argued the case for «process - thought».

[When I moved from the Carolinas to Massachusetts for school] most of the white Southerners at the time could recite long lists of battles lost and won and argue over...

It is plausible to argue that this new regime evolved over time with the tacit consent of the governed.

I would also argue that if there is no change over time, one would discover the same unhappy result.

And this is what we Atheists are trying to explain to those who keep expressing this sentiment — you're arguing semantics over the time, but you still believe the «end» will happen as the bible says, so you are essentially issuing the same warning just with less confidence of when it will happen.

«So the Chinese and Japanese have been arguing for some time over who invented ramen.

«Andy's masterpiece was such a hit last year that we didn't bother arguing over his obsession with the Great Pumpkin this time.

The downward trends over time argue against the assumption that the reduced consumption of refined sugars and SSB will, in themselves, help to reverse societal trends in obesity and chronic disease.

«Charlie argues all the time there's white lines and you can not drive over them.