Sentences with phrase «time commenters who»

I'm a first time commenter who just bought a new townhouse.

Not exact matches

The fact that the comments are identical isn't a sign of nefarious activity in and of itself, but the lack of a clear source for the message, the alphabetically - organized filings, the reported denials of those who are listed as commenters, and the sheer volume of comments listed in such a short time frame, raise questions about their legitimacy.

I second the commenter above who said that as you're learning to cook, it's useful to pick one ingredient at a time to get really enthusiastic about (it's easier to get excited about cooking this way).

well i get where you come from but i wouldnt call it less passionate but more practical, i just do nt like to be butthurt ^ ^ i am fan of arsenal to enjoy the time i spend on football but if it ends in failures i try to get over its and be constructive about it, and i am not a fan of people who cant control their anger pains and have to project their frustrations onto the people who could be held responsible but not in this scale, in my opinion of the society humans should be able to control their emotions a bit and never stoop as low as to be abusive and i do think that a lot of comments on justarsenal were abusive and sorry but i do nt think of it as passionate an extreme example would be ultras you could call them muuuuch more passionate than me but in my opinion they are just scum of football, but of course i do nt want to compare the JA - commenters to ultras xD i just tried to illustrate my opinion ^ ^

Oh, and best of all, Joel Grey (openly gay now but not at the time of winning his Best Supporting Actor award) as that scary Master of Ceremonies who acts as the audience's window into the twisted heart of the rise of Nazi - ism in Germany, and an observer / commenter to the bisexual threesome that gives the film its frisson.

«Frank or Francis» pivots around a vain filmmaker (Steve Carell) who represents half the title (he writes, directs and plays every part in his opus, «You»), a bitter, but sharp online film commenter (Jack Black), as well as a failed comedian with a resume of unflattering fat - baiting time - wasters, including «Fat Dad» (playing against type, it's Nicolas Cage).

It seems that almost every time we write an article about any sort of Volkswagen Group product, there will be at least one commenter who...

I figured now would be the PERFECT TIME to use the KINDLE CountDown opportunity, especially given where I'm positioned on the interment on LinkedIn where I Own three groups and Moderate three more, Twitter, etc I'm also being interviewed next week by someone who has a very sizeable following, and where I'm one of the MOST FREQUENT commenter.

Further, the commenter does not explain why a creditor would escalate collection efforts on a borrower who consistently makes on - time payments.

Specifically, some commenters asked that we define the cohort of students for whom completion rates and withdrawal rates are calculated and address whether the cohort includes all students who received title IV, HEA program funds in a particular award year, or at any time in the past.

So, if I write an article about this in Examiner (which no one reads anyway — ha), what do I say to the commenter who says, «Gee, every time I bring up the name of a «scientist» who disputes warming, I get told he's not an expert and doesn't know what he's talking about, so why should I believe this other non-climate change expert who doesn't dispute warming?

Two full disclosures, first on who I am and what I do (http://gelbspanfiles.com/?p=4893), and second, that the person at the heart of the attack below, Tom Harris, has alerted me to his letters - to - the - editor from time to time, knowing of my 8 - year history of jousting with online commenters that I mentioned and showed in a screencapture in the above link about myself.

Every time we discuss a project like this, we get countless commenters who believe that protected lands are protected for a reason, and that those who bend the rules are setting a dangerous precedent.

Bloggers who commit to accurate reporting build up credibility or even popularity and recognition over time with a checks and balance system from commenters, other bloggers, reviews, etc..

First (# 274), for about the millionth time, he falsely accuses commenters who he disparages as «renewables types» of using this blog for purposes of commercial gain, i.e. «advertising» — which is utter nonsense and nothing more than a pathetic flame - baiting insult.

Last time I wrote about it, there were plenty of commenters who pointed out that hybrid or not, it's still a giant tank.

At the same time, we agree with those commenters who explained that correctional facilities have legitimate needs for use and sharing of individually identifiable health information inmates without authorization.

A frequent commenter at the website, who posts as «B. McLeod» started an entertaining (and, at times, informative) debate when he wrote:

BUT — I can think of at least one commenter on Pink Tape who makes valuable contributions from time to time but does so anonymously in order not to compromise his / her judicial impartiality, and at least one commenter on Pink Tape who does so quite openly, drawing on judicial experience to back up opinion.

By taking a drab layout and customizing it to your exact specifications, you can make any subreddit sing the praises of your favorite presidential candidate, while leaving behind the annoying choir of commenters who think you and everyone you know is wrong about everything all the time.

I read through the comment section of that editorial several times, and I can't help but cringe at all the commenters who sorely and actively miss the point and overlook the usefulness of BoomSound.

This commenter also explained consumers who enter into multiple transactions at the same time would benefit from receiving consistent disclosures for different types of loans.