I mentioned years ago on this site that lag
time effects of heating and cooling of the planet, both forward and aft from peak to trough of the solar cycle, exist as a result of solar variability.
Not exact matches
«The limitations
of quantum thermal dynamics may only be attributed by the
heated degradation
effects in
timed probabilities upon perpetual decaying ratios
of certain atoms structuralized accolades
of which quantum physics remains allegorically aloof upon and can not be soundly fathomed via any mathematical physics conveyances which by the way are fraught with faulty mathematical probabilities and unreasoned factual soundings.»
As some products are sensitive to
heat, the design
of these systems has to be considered carefully with respect to temperature and holding
time in order to achieve the desired
effects on the one hand, but without causing
heat damage on the other.
In the last few decades it has been established beyond any reasonable doubt that bioeffects and some adverse health
effects occur at far lower levels
of RF... exposure where no
heating... occurs at all; some
effects are shown to occur at several hundred thousand
times below the existing public safety limits where
heating is an impossibility.»
The team still doesn't understand the genetic mechanism responsible for the
effect, but study author and evolutionary biologist Francisco Rodríguez - Trelles
of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona notes a clue: Flies carrying the «summer» inversions to deal with the
heat wave produced five
times more offspring than they would have in ordinary years.
For the first
time, scientists have simulated the reverse
of the common
effect where cold water runs away from
heat, and the result could keep electronics cool
Although CFCs are extremely persistent, remaining in the upper atmosphere for decades, and although they are 10,000
times more efficient than carbon dioxide at trapping
heat, the process
of controlling them has been under way for years, for reasons having nothing to do with the greenhouse
effect.
But when it leaks into the air before it gets to the pilot light, methane has 30
times the short - term
heat - trapping
effects of carbon dioxide.
A previous paper by Garrick - Bethell and some
of the same coauthors described the
effects of tidal stretching and
heating of the moon's crust at a
time 4.4 billion years ago when the solid outer crust still floated on an ocean
of molten rock.
The second step involved calculating Earth's energy balance for this
time period, using estimates
of greenhouse gas concentrations extracted from air bubbles in ice cores, and incorporating astronomical factors, known as Milankovitch Cycles, that
effect the planetary
heat budget.
Think
of a holiday road trip's
effect on the climate this way: The amount
of heat a car contributes to the atmosphere because
of its carbon emissions may be 100,000
times greater than the actual
heat given off by its engine.
The tidal
heating effect could persist for tens
of millions to billions
of years, giving any potential life
time to evolve.
When the urban
heat island
effect was taken into account, they found that the economic cost
of climate change for these cities would be 2.6
times higher than previously thought.
At the same
time, the ocean absorbs more than 90 per cent
of the
heat that is generated by the greenhouse
effect.
It may only last for 9 days, but that in my opinion would be sufficient
time for it to be stable, since its concentration is determined by
heat in the system (you mentioned the remarkable latent
heat of water, so the
effect of the ocean
heat content would provide plenty
of stability).
The difficulty lies in recognizing a thyroid problem during a
time when some
of the chief complaints — fatigue, constipation and
heat intolerance — can be either the normal side
effects of pregnancy or signals that something is wrong with the thyroid.
Since the skin sweats and makes us feel good in short period
of time, such form
of yoga can have harmful
effects that are just not limited to dehydration and
heat stroke -
So, the next
time you hear someone cite research during a
heated debate over, say, the
effects of standardized tests, ask how the research was conducted.
Spark Advance: Ignition
timing has one
of the greatest
effects on
heat - range selections.
Regardless, I would posit the worsening winter ice formation is as expected given the poles suffer first and winters warm faster than summers, BUT that this is happening within two years
of the EN peak, which was my
time line in 2015, one wonders if the combination
of warm EN -
heated Pacific waters (oceans move slowly) and warm air are a trailing edge
of the EN
effect OR this is signallibg a phase change driven by that EN, or is just an extreme winter event.
Are you saying that loading the climate system with 29 ZJ (increased RF)
of energy every year or that the cumulative
effects of increasing the loading over
time, say more than a century, would not increase the odds
of having
heat waves?
I didn't know anything about the mesospheric
effect at the
time of your last comment, but I've looked into it a little bit since then, and I gather that there is non-CO2
heating there involving ozone as well as a variety
of chemical reactions.
Never mind the
heat — feel the humidity A look at the combined
effect of heat and humidity At the
time of writing, the early morning temperature in Doha was 37C — not too bad you might think.
Victor has been told countless
times that the
heat content
of the earth system is dependent on the net
effect of all
of the radiative forcings, i.e. energy in versus energy out.
That will have an
effect on the geometric absorption
of heat I suppose, relational to the amount
of GHG's at a given
time and the amount
of earth absorbing the solar radiation.
My point is that I could easily see how the entire system in question could be warming, but because
of transient
effects, like weather patterns, the additional
heat energy could easily wind up not where we're measuring it for months or even years at a
time.
Re 583 Chris Korda — having looked at the graph, setting aside the
effect of varying response
times of different parts
of the system as suggested by Chris Dudley (if I'm remembering correctly), one would expect all
heat - capacity - delayed responses to always be approaching the instantaneous (zero
heat capacity) response, which is why their slopes should change sign when they intersect the instantaneous curves.
Any station that is not very rural will suffer from a
heat island
effect, which may be constant over
time but means the station does not give an unbiased estimate
of the mean temperature for the area it is supposed to represent.
I would suggest comparing peak to peak average temperature captures during weighted El - Nino events (during the
time they occur, if they can be compared equally this would be a telling graph), instead
of considering year to year records as a means
of reducing ENSO
effects on the temperature record, ENSO being largely a
heat exchange between air and sea causing great changes in cloud distribution world wide.
The essence
of the greenhouse
effect is that the atmosphere inhibits energy loss (to space) so that for a given rate
of solar energy input, the temperature
of the surface has to be greater in order to allow the necessary amount
of heat to be lost per unit
time.
Corresponding
time for surface + tropospheric equilibration: given 3 K warming (including feedbacks) per ~ 3.7 W / m2 forcing (this includes the
effects of feedbacks): 10 years per
heat capacity
of ~ 130 m layer
of ocean (~
heat capacity
of 92 or 93 m
of liquid water spread over the whole globe)
Heat capacity that is «used» over a longer period
of time (penetration
of temperature change through the depths
of the ocean and up to regions
of upwelling) would leave a more persistent residual imbalance, but the
effect would only just stall the full change to equilibrium climate, not change the long term equilibrium sensitivity.)
That's the conclusion
of a Carnegie Institution for Science study... that shows two things: Emissions from burning a lump
of coal or a gallon
of gas has an
effect on the climate 100,000
times greater than the
heat given off by burning the fossil fuel itself.
The lag
time effect refers to the
effect of heat stored in the ocean and subsequently released to warm land temperatures.
the climate
effect of burning fossil fuels is 100,000
times greater than the amount
of heat given off while burning the fuel.
The low SHGC does have the negative
effect of reducing winter
time passive solar
heating.
This suggests that by using the
heat mass
of warmth units absorbed, the oceans are 10
times as sensitive to CO2 and other
effects.
However, as the ocean's surface temperature increases over
time from the
effects of climate change, more and more
heat is released into the atmosphere.
And there was NO
effect on temperatures at lower altitudes over that
time, even from this massive
heating event where about 20 %
of the entire atmosphere warmed.
The oceanic
heat store should be regarded as an additional
heat source that adds or subtracts the
effect of earlier solar irradiance (or lack
of it) to or from the present day
effect of current solar irradiance over variable periods
of time.
Oceanic oscillations are sufficient to cancel out or enhance the
effects of natural variations in solar irradiance or other forms
of solar input to the
heat budget
of the Earth for variable periods
of time.
5) A warming
effect in the atmosphere arises because between coming in and going out the radiant energy is «processed» by the molecules in the atmosphere into
heat energy and then back again, often many
times for a single parcel
of radiant energy, the number
of times being directly proportionate to the density
of the atmosphere.
On the other hand,
heat released by the fire itself would likely be thousands
of times less than
heat produced by the greenhouse
effect before the methane is oxidized into CO2.
Combining the greater share
of weather stations in more urban areas over
time with this urban
heat effect also tends to increase the rate that recorded temperatures tend to rise over
time.
For as long as climatologists have studied it, the Southern Ocean has been almost ice - free in summer, the
time of year when it would receive enough
heat from the Sun to have a large
effect.
For comparison, geothermal
heat, the
heat from Earth's hot interior leaking out through the crust, is about 45 TW or three
times the direct
heating effect of human activities.
Given that the global atmosphere
of 2013 does not equal the global atmosphere
of 1946, nor does the ocean
heat content
of 2013 equal the likely ocean
heat content
of 1946, all these factors combined make the next few decades among the most exciting
times to be studying the climate and the relative anthropogenic
effects theron.
The interaction
of ocean circulation, which serves as a type
of heat pump, and biological
effects such as the concentration
of carbon dioxide can result in global climate changes on a
time scale
of decades.
I know that there is a logarithmic
effect for
heat between objects
of different temps to equilibriate, but I really struggle to imagine how that could extend meaningfully over such a long period
of time.
Cause and
effect if far more plausible — i.e., the Earth takes on
heat during
times of increased solar activity and gives up
heat when solar activity decreases.