Sentences with phrase «time evidence about»

Not exact matches

The Times said that a search warrant executed on Cohen's property on Monday also was seeking evidence about whether he tried to suppress damaging information about Trump during the presidential campaign.

Those of us interested in cybersecurity were underwhelmed by the amount of air time the issue got during most of the 2016 campaign, but worse was the empirical evidence that the Democratic candidate — famous for an email security problem — was clueless about cybersecurity.

If Perkins is involved in any «criminal or legal process» that requires her to give evidence about Weinstein or Miramax, his production company at the time, she'd need to give 48 hours» notice to a designated lawyer first.

We may not know the portion size Taft enjoyed for his lunch and dinner steaks as precisely as we do his breakfast beef (he was often a three - times - a-day steak eater), but there's concrete evidence about his preferred preparation.

For example, the only evidence from KM about whether bitumen and diluent (dilbit) could be cleaned up in the marine environment came from a one - time only, non-published, non-peer reviewed experiment over a 10 - day period in Gainford, Alberta.

Thinking differently about something takes time and effort, and often requires compounding evidence.

What is not important is spending a lot of time looking for evidence that the current state of the company is about to turn imminently or identifying «catalysts» that could initiate that turnaround.

Just as important, at a time when fears over China's slowing economy are widespread and there's evidence of retail saturation in the country's major metropolitan areas, nearly half of survey participants said they expect to be better off financially in the next 12 months — and they are eager to spend, contrary to gloomy assumptions about the drag of sluggish economic growth on consumer sentiment.

Survey evidence suggests that consumers became more concerned about employment prospects during the course of the year; the net balance of respondents to the Westpac - Melbourne Institute survey expecting lower unemployment fell sharply over this time.

Instead, they can choose a mix of investments based on the best evidence about how markets perform over time and then hold on to those investments for the long term.

We've known about the evidence of epigenetics in nature for quite some time.

In terms of Jesus you really must look at the evidence, nothing was written about jesus contemporary to his times.

It's evidence time, and we are about to see the same old dance — either he is going to provide ridiculous unsupported gibberish, or he is going to vanish without a trace.

All biblical evidence points to the fact that there was an understanding about the nature of the earth and many other topics far beyond the secular understanding of the time.

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

But the Word of God, written at about the same time, recording the events of an obscure Jewish man and Jewish girl, has survived through time to give evidence to God's hand at work in the lives of His people.

For example, we might have a difficult time finding appropriate historical evidence for claims about Jesus's life.

I wrote in the New York Times about the overwhelming evidence of design.

Because of God's transcendence it would be mythological to refer to God's action in terms appropriate only to objects available, in principle at least, to ordinary sense perception.13 This especially means that one can not speak of God in terms of the categories of time and space; 14 i.e., whatever is predicated of God can not apply only to some particular time and space, but must apply equally to all times and spaces.15 Thus the implication of Ogden's criterion for non-mythological language about God corresponds to his statement of several years ago, that «there is not the slightest evidence that God has acted in Christ in any way different from the way in which he primordially acts in every other event.

We have manuscript evidence of the NT within 30 - 50 years of the time of the events... the closest for Homer is I believe about 600 years!!

For historical evidence of the Bible, just look up in your history books about the Assyrians and Babylonians taking over Israel several hundred years BCE, or that the Romans were in power during the time of Jesus, that they did use crucifixion as a form of execution.

This «list» of evidences of atheism is trite, simplistic, and actually quite unfactual; but then again, when was the last time that Christians actually sought facts about something... Peace.

So the one thing the debate showed last night is that Newt won't be touched significantly by any of the existing evidence about his interesting past — including how he's been earning his living over the last decacde — any time soon.

The internal evidence of the book of Daniel and what he knows and writes about has been shown to be accurate and could not have been known to anyone unless they were living in Babylon at the time of it's empire.

So, I say, gods might exist but the probability is very low, and decreasing given the amount of time believers have been flailing about trying to make the irrational rational and how science provides better answers with real evidence, peer - reviewed under the scientific method.

You could believe all this, but next time you think «a fool said in his heart there is no god», remember how many religions you don't believe, and how making those bland statements is not likely to sway many of us who think critically about evidence.

Archaeologists have found new evidence about the time frame of the biblical texts, based on what's essentially a shopping list.

I corrected you both times, that I never made a claim about the existence of minds or evidence (though isn't it blatantly obvious to you, me, and pretty much everyone, that they do exist?).

Although straightforward, specific talk about the shortcomings of a congregation has its place, its power to transform a church in contemporary times is not very much in evidence.

It seems that just weeks before the general election that old leftist rag, Time Magazine, has flushed out evidence of militant, right wing, militia types running around my neck of the woods: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2022516,00.html As it turns out about fifteen years....

As far as evidence goes, he was written about in multiple biblical sources, which obviously you won't take into account because you believe the bible to be fantasy, but when you think about how all biblical books were written at different times, in different places, by different people, you can at least say there is a decent chance he lived.

The task of a non-Muslim scholar writing about Islam is that of constructing an exposition that will do justice to the Western academic tradition, by growing directly out of the objective evidence and by being rationally coherent both within itself and with all other knowledge, and at the same time will do justice to the faith in men's hearts by commanding their assent once it is formulated.

On 16 July in a letter to Jonas, Luther retailed further evidence of the progress of the Council of Trent, and of its futility: «The man of Mainz [Cardinal Albrecht] has sent some ridiculous delegates to the council but that monster laughs at the same time about us and the Pope.

It is difficult to put all the evidence in such a matter into words, to gather up into a distinct statement all that one bases one's conclusions on, but I have always felt that I had abundant evidence to justify (to myself, at least) the conclusion that I came to then, and since have held to, that the physical change which came at that time was, first, the result of a change wrought within me by a change of mental state; and secondly, that that change of mental state was not, save in a very secondary way, brought about through the influence of an excited imagination, or a consciously received suggestion of an hypnotic sort.

this myth for years that the arsenal board and shreholders are greedy and only care about money has baffed me for a long time now, there is no concrete evidence that that is the case just opinions that its the case, the board are there to just make sure that the club runs smoothly and do nt go bankrupt under there watch in the history of the club that all the board has ever done nothing more.

There are various theories about why the Gunners keep falling short in the race for the Premier League title and our various and numerous injury problems certainly do not help, but it is the way that the team fails to turn up at times in crucial games, such as the EPL defeat by Wartford recently or the Champions League hammering at the hands of Bayern Munich that many will point to as evidence that the boss is not getting the best from his squad anymore.

About Coquelin for whom we desperately needed a back up, lets not forget that Le Frog send him on loan cuz he thought the position was covered with FLAMINY, now because of the injury crisis he was recalled back to the first team and saved us from debacle, this is just more evidence that this man is completely out of touch with reality and needs to go, we are the laughingstock not only of the EPL but from the world of football...... last time I say it nicely WENGER get the....

The factors listed above also does not show why he would reject Arsenal.This is just building castles in the air.I can also gather evidence on more stranger transfers.Lyon know he wants to leave and at this point in time they want to get everything done quickly as possible.Also Lacazette has constantly been telling Aulas that he wants to go this window and this should tell you that now it's not even about Athletico since he can go there only in January.A fee has already been agreed according to Aulas himself.As for me if you ask me I think it's as good as done because even Lacazette is keen to move this window.It will surely be done if you really look at Lacazette's standpoint.

He still has a major role to play for Man Utd as evidenced by how much Mourinho has looked to him this year, and so while Redknapp makes a fair point about his playing time perhaps being reduced, the suggestion that he may even have to leave is a bit far - fetched.

I have seen no evidence that either of them participated in any kind of bad behavior, or even knew about any of the specific events, yet I have a hard time believing that neither of them had a sense that something was going on.

MLB didn't do the best job of presenting enough evidence to confirm that the ball wasn't juiced and it also didn't help matters when pitchers complained about the balls being too slick during the World Series, of all times.

Without Evidence If a person of colour has the misfortune of suffering acts of racism without recorded evidence — which is 99 % of the time as we don't go about with the recording features of our mobile phones turned on in anticipation of capturing racial abuses against us — then it is our word against those of our abusers before the person of authority who is most likely to bEvidence If a person of colour has the misfortune of suffering acts of racism without recorded evidence — which is 99 % of the time as we don't go about with the recording features of our mobile phones turned on in anticipation of capturing racial abuses against us — then it is our word against those of our abusers before the person of authority who is most likely to bevidence — which is 99 % of the time as we don't go about with the recording features of our mobile phones turned on in anticipation of capturing racial abuses against us — then it is our word against those of our abusers before the person of authority who is most likely to be white.

The lack of Champions League or Europa League duties mean that the fringe players need game time, as evidenced by Kurt Zouma's recent comments about possibly leaving the club.

A lengthy, well - researched, and powerful article in the Spring 2015 issue of the NCAA's Champion magazine, not only reports the belief of many top concussion experts that the media narrative about sports - related concussion trace has been dominated by media reports on the work of Dr. Ann McKee, which was the centerpiece of PBS Frontline's League of Denial, but Dr. McKee's, however belated, mea culpa that «There's no question [that her autopsies finding evidence of CTE in the brains of most of the former athletes were] a very biased study,» that they involved «a certain level of... sensationalism», that there were «times when it's overblown» and went «a little too far.»

Over time, Easy Baby Life has grown to also include evidence - based research and information about pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding, baby care and simply coping with life as a new parent.

• Reducing rates of urinary tract infection later in life (for details, see this evidence - based article about the timing of toilet training) In addition, parents who train early avoid many pitfalls.

While the evidence indicates she is capable of greater earnings if employed so as to use her secretarial skills and if she maintained regular employment, the job she held at the time of trial would yield her only about $ 5280 per year.

For a review of the evidence, see this article about the timing of toilet training.

However, shared decision - making requires taking the time and willingness to engage in evidence - based discussions with women about the pros and cons of different care options.

Policymakers and funders should use the available research on implementation and encourage future work to guide decisions about how to scale up evidence - based programs effectively and support them over time.