Sentences with phrase «time for a debate about»

Hours after his victory was declared, Mr Reckless headed straight back to the Commons in time for a debate about an EU trade deal.

The time for debate about the future of membership is now, and disclosure of the figure is an essential part of it.

«That was quite useful because it reduced the time for debate about a person's qualifications to be on the List and, instead, made the debate more about where on the List people should be», said Little.

But then Cameron said that it was time for a debate about future policy on onshore wind installations.

Not exact matches

Although the debates scarcely touched on the economy or business, the conversation was at times a vivid example for business owners, about how to lead people in their own companies.

At a time when debate about a potential outer harbour project south of Perth is building momentum, a look at the history of development in Kwinana's industrial zone provides an illustration of the impact of government intervention in the state's economy, for better or worse.

ANALYSIS: CBH has served WA grain growers for more than 80 years, but debate is raging about whether now is the time to kill the co-op.

This debate raises profound questions — probably not for the last time — about the effectiveness of the Fed's easy - money policy.

By the time I joined the Reserve Bank in the early 1970s, there was already an active internal debate about the need for change.

This opened up an interesting opportunity for a national debate about what we want E.I. to be — coverage right now is at all time lows, and the accumulated deficit from the last recession -LSB-...]

These discussions about compatibility have their place, but if we spend all our time justifying which side of the gender equality debate we're on, the conversation will never truly progress and the Church will never become the advocate for women it could be.

That it was unusual for a Jewish rabbi to be unmarried and there was much debate about this for a long time, as there still is today.

CNN: My Take: It's time for evangelicals to speak up about guns Pastor and author Daniel Darling urges evangelicals to participate in the debate over access to guns, and to acknowledge that there is «no clear - cut Christian position on gun control.»

Mike i have been thinking hard on this subject i hope you do nt leave the forum as i think we will get into a good debate / discussion the Lord has shown me alot of insight into this subject that i hadnt even thought about until Jeremy proposed his point of view.The word say iron sharpens iron we need to understand what we believe not just walk away because we feel it is treading on our beliefs because they change as we learn and understand because we have believed something for a long time does nt make it right.Use this opportunity to grow to learn and to understand what the Lord is wanting us to know if we cant do this as brothers how are we supposed to do it with unbelievers.brentnz

You also say: «there is some debate about whether Paul was describing his own preference and practice, or whether he was giving instructions for all churches everywhere throughout time to follow as well.»

Second, even if Paul himself did require all women to remain silent in church gatherings, there is some debate about whether Paul was describing his own preference and practice, or whether he was giving instructions for all churches everywhere throughout time to follow as well.

Most modern definitions of God are based on Platonic philosophy anyway, so maybe it is time for a reset on the entire debate about God anyway...

After Romney lied 27 times in 38 minutes during a civic debate for the presidency, I wonder if they had a serious discussion about «thou shalt not bear false wittiness»?.

If she was making a effort to comfort another family that was about to go through the same rough road that she and her family had, is this then the real time for such an debate.

So, let them debate this until the end of time... I for one think that he would have probably stood up for «Gay Rights»... and I'm really the only person I need to worry about.

I debated for a long time about investing in these new ingredients because 1) they're expensive in small quantities and 2) I was so used to wheat flour and didn't want to adapt.

«Can I say to Australians the debate that they are hearing about a carbon tax is a debate about what Tony Abbott calls a carbon tax, which [it] will be for a limited period of time and then we will move to an emissions trading scheme.»

I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.

I personally don't care about star rankings at all, but that's a debate for a different time.

Should this even be a topic?Giroud is a player of average quality always surrounded by good players.I just don't get.It's as if only Arsenal fans rate him.This was a player who was bought to be the leading striker at Arsenal and after his years of failure which many deny he's now become a super sub?How laughable is that.From failure to super sub.If the so called world class striker we're signing goes out with an injury for about five months who comes in then.It seems to me people lack vision.Why is it always Giroud Giroud Giroud?After so many seasons people are still debating what souldn't even be debatable.I've lost count of the number of times he's been talked about here.This is the problem with our club.It's just not ruthless.This is a player who should have been gone long ago but due to him being French he still gets the chances.We won't miss him when he goes and I'd like to see if he'd stand out in a smaller club.

I thought people here were debating about two or three seasons back why he should be our top striker.When I thought the Monaco match was the icing on the cake to show how average he was it seems just like Wenger we» will never learn our lesson.Now people our okay with him being a super sub which is debatable.Giroud was a super sub in games last season because he wasn't played when he was supposed to.He's not your ideal super sub because he very hardly creates but rather requires people to create for him.Most of the time super subs are the one's who tend to create the chances and open up spaces in the opposition defence.West ham are ready to pay and hence we should demand more from them.We can then use the money from his sale on far better players.Given the same seasons, time and chances a lot of average strikers can do better than what he did.This is because Arsenal create a lot of chances and it just needs someone who can finish.Goodbye!.

To the ramsey n Ox debate yes it's true at times ox can look like a world beater but too many times he bottles it or makes very poor decisions so subs bench is just about right for him.

Rubio remains the runner - up, but he has slipped since his poor debate performance when he repeated the same talking point five separate times, raising questions about whether or not he is ready for prime time.

How great the time will be when we can start debating in earnest about his successor and what a pity it is we acted too late for it to be Pep Guardiola or even Klopp.

For a long time, there was an yearly debate to fill up air time about whether this was the «fifth major.»

For a long time now, one of the most talked about factors of the Arsenal team, often seen as a weakness but always a topic of debate, is the central midfield area.

Amid the ongoing debate about whether he has been rewarded for failure or if he deserves another chance because of his time at Everton, Moyes knows getting results on the field is the priority.

But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I really feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic.

I'm glad this is your theme for the month because there is much debate out there about time outs and how to do them etc..

Reward yourself with a good read and take some time out for learning more about the history of cloth diapers and the politics behind the «cloth vs. disposable debate»

The first debate of this kind on this levels is aptly timed for Baby Loss... Continue reading The Baby Loss Debate: Talk About it We debate of this kind on this levels is aptly timed for Baby Loss... Continue reading The Baby Loss Debate: Talk About it We Debate: Talk About it We Must →

Susan Cain's Quiet Revolution: «Class Participation: Let's Talk About It» American Camp Association magazine, «While Goodbye is Never Enough for Me, It's Perfect for Him» Room for Debate at the New York Times, «Autonomy Works Best for the Classroom» Your Teen: On parenting through college admissions: «It's Their Journey, Not Yours» Your Teen: Review of the book Wonder, written with Ben Lahey Your Teen: Review of the book Echo, written with Finn Lahey

So much energy goes into the debate that few people take time to even talk about the moms who do both: breastfeed for a bit and then transition to formula feeding.

It will — or it should — rule the question of secession out of political debate for a long period of time, and the Scotland Act should be amended to help bring about this end.

The NWLC graphic caught the public debate around tax cuts for millionaires at a good time, hitting a nerve with people angry about constant talk of budget cuts without tax increases for people who've done well in the last decade or two.

Under neo-liberalism it's become quite clear that we can drown in proceduralism — there's no problem keeping people busy with paperwork and accountability, or in the case of deliberative democrats for example, we can have important debates about how to redraw and then defend the borders of a democratic country legitimately — but if all those things take up all our time, we'll look up from our papers and our borders one day, and see that there isn't anything left to fight over.

As far as I remember, it was the first time that political entities and parties were openly calling for abstentionism, and this triggered some debate about whether advocating for abstentionism was a constitutional right or not.

And by the time they arrived in Las Vegas for that third debate, Clinton's top aides were boasting about how they were about to expand the lead and pull marginal Senate candidates over the line to give her a governing majority.

Only a few months before he leaves the Guardian, Rusbridger indicated his future priorities: «A few weeks ago Philip Hammond (the British Foreign Secretary) said it was time to draw a line under the debate about Snowden, but for me the debate is just beginning.»

Think about the televising of the 1960 presidential debate, which quite likely shifted the election to Kennedy, or news coverage of the 1968 Tet Offensive in Vietnam, which turned American opinion against the war for the first time.

The Times calls Paterson's push for a so - called pardon panel «brave — and startling,» adding: «(the governor has) shown courage and common sense at a time when the national debate about immigration shows little of either.»

When The New York Times Magazine asked Nixon the often - debated question of where upstate begins, the Democratic candidate cited Ithaca — about a four - hour drive from New York City and far beyond most commonly cited borders for the start of upstate.

«It's a time for everyone to put aside political debates, put aside protests, put aside all of the things that we will talk about in all due time.»

He vacillated about the presidency for so long that he was at times derided as «Hamlet on the Hudson,» and he once famously left two planes sitting on a tarmac in Albany while he debated whether to fly to New Hampshire to enter the 1992 race.

Arguably now's the time if he's ever going to do it to use the assets he's got a bit more wisely and apply them to things like the debate on tuition fees that they're having at the moment about what the policy is, how they're going to pay for it.