Of course, Ms. Crandall adds, «there was probably something disingenuous even at
the time in abortion advocates» concern for children.»
@ tallulah13: mother's life is at serious risk less than 1 % of
the time in abortions.
Not exact matches
Although the exact number of illegal
abortions in the U.S. is hard to determine, many reproductive rights experts believe that self - induced
abortions will continue to rise as the process of finding a legal
abortion becomes more
time - consuming and difficult.
Even
in situations where
abortion is legal, the process of finding a legitimate provider is
time - consuming and difficult, forcing many women — particularly those who are young, poor, and uneducated — to seek out illegal options.
Dawn Huckelbridge, director of American Bridge's Women's Rights Initiative, released the following statement
in response to the US Senate's vote on a bill that would ban
abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy and threaten doctors with jail
time:
Speaking to the High River
Times in April 2015, Mr. Fraser was quoted as saying «I will emphasize the Pro-Life values of Albertans, making constituents and other candidates aware of the issues surrounding
abortion and how they are directly relevant to provincial policy... We should de-fund
abortion and fund the life affirming alternatives of crisis pregnancy support, parental support, and adoption.»
Those who speak out against
abortion and family practice and at the same
time support cuts
in education, school lunch funding, decry reasonable control of weapons and other programs that help children can not call themselves Christians.
So Randy Barnett, who disagrees with Mitt on stuff like
abortion, is shouting,
in his highly principled libertarian way, that this is the most important election
in a long
time.
He did not dwell on
abortion, but he would visit the subject from
time to
time in his homilies, usually from the standpoint of one who identifies with the aborted.
kendallpeak I was merely pointing out that the Bible, a book that you likely consider authoritative regarding God's supposed view of
abortion, not only has numerous sections that illustrate that a fetus was not considered a person
in those
times, but that the Jewish people, whose books these references come from, have upheld that interpretation.
With touching concern for the welfare of the Republican Party, an editorial
in the very Democratic New York
Times warns that
abortion is the issue that «could split the party open» and takes Ralph Reed of the Christian Coalition to task for having «overplayed his hand» and endangered the Republicans» electoral chances with his demand for pro-life candidates.
These considerations are made even more relevant because of present United States commitments to international treaties on human rights, which could conceivably, at some
time, put United States positive laws relating to
abortion and the judges who implement them at variance with and
in violation of a future international consensus on that issue.»
You don't think the «elephant
in the room» of OUR
time is the fact that we awkwardly pretend affirmative action isn't racist;
abortion isn't murder; people compare the gay marriage debate to 300 + years of black slavery, oppression, and / or murder; and the major political parties act like Ron Paul doesn't exist?
Abortion is not a sin, the bible doesn't support that and it's been legal since roe vs wade
in 1973 once again the fetus can not survive outside of the mothers womb the first 21 weeks and that is the only
time it's legal, after 21 weeks the fetus can survive, breath, eat, think ect.
The statistics: Today's students and young adults have grown up
in a
time when
abortion was widely accessible and acceptable, and a striking number are determined to end that era.
And Family Research Council President Tony Perkins says the last
time his conservative Christian movement saw so many victories at the state level — where many legislatures are busy passing new
abortion restrictions - was
in 2004, when more than a dozen states adopted same - sex marriage bans.
And
in an online piece for The New Republic, Debbie Nathan argues that the New York
Times is squishy about
abortion: «What is The New York
Times» problem with
abortion?
Despite Jody's observations, I think McCain was absolutely right not to spend a lot
time talking about
abortion and related issues
in his acceptance speech.
For instance, not once
in Achieving Our Country is there a mention of
abortion, the single most determinative question
in the alignment of the forces
in cultural and moral conflict today, which is to say
in the real politics of our
time.
I don't have
time for your silly mind games, did you understand that you are advocating bloody murder
in the name of
abortion?
If
abortion and related life issues are
in fact the great civil - rights issues of our
time»
in that they test whether the state may arbitrarily deny the protection of the law to certain members of the human community» then Griswold eventually led to a situation
in which the Democratic and Republican positions on civil rights flipped, with members of today's Democratic party playing the role that its Southern intransigents played during the glory days of the American civil - rights movement.
Or, if you consider
abortion murder, then god is the most proficient abortionist, since so many pregnancies end
in miscarriage, many
times before the woman even knew she was carrying a fetus.
She must return a third
time for the ingestion of the second drug (misoprostol, used both
in RU - 486 and the new «
abortion cocktail»), whereupon she is subjected to a second pelvic examination as well as to an elaborate mix of blood tests.
The New York
Times: Irish Poised to Revisit
Abortion Law
Abortion is back on the agenda
in Ireland after a European Court of Human Rights ruling last year found the state
in violation of its own Constitution on the matter.
CNN: Viral video shows Romney
in testy exchange over his faith In campaign time, it's ancient history: a 2007 video showing a testy off - air exchange between Mitt Romney and a radio host over the candidate's faith and his stance on abortio
in testy exchange over his faith
In campaign time, it's ancient history: a 2007 video showing a testy off - air exchange between Mitt Romney and a radio host over the candidate's faith and his stance on abortio
In campaign
time, it's ancient history: a 2007 video showing a testy off - air exchange between Mitt Romney and a radio host over the candidate's faith and his stance on
abortion.
«The passage of
time hasn't changed the fact that
abortion is a serious, lethal violation of fundamental human rights,» Congressman Smith told more than 600,000 people gathered
in Washington DC for the 2014 March for Life.
(CNN)--
In campaign
time, it's ancient history: a 2007 video showing a testy off - air exchange between Mitt Romney and a radio host over the candidate's faith and his stance on
abortion.
The majority of the electorate simply do not share their views so try as they might every
time, someone running on the platform to outlaw
abortion or make gay people bad, etc. will just not win
in the general election, period.
By the
time W finished his second term, I had graduated from college, come to terms with the fact that the criminalization of
abortion is highly unlikely no matter the party
in power, expanded my definition of «pro-life» to include Iraqi children and prisoners of war, and experienced first - hand some of the major problems with America's healthcare system, which along with poverty and education issues, contributes to the troubling
abortion rate
in the U.S. I remained pro-life idealistically, but for the first
time, voted for a pro-choice president, hoping that the reforms I wanted to see
in the healthcare, the economy, immigration, education, and for the socioeconomically disadvantaged would function pragmatically to reduce
abortions.
And the Christian community woke up — the Southern Baptists at the
time, we sometimes forget, were
in favor of
abortion rights and supported Roe.
Sixty - three percent of political and religious conservatives support allowing women and couples
in the developing nations to determine the
timing and spacing of pregnancies
in a manner that includes the voluntary use of methods of preventing pregnancy — not including
abortion — that are harmonious with their religious values and beliefs.
You have no pro-life credibility whatsoever if you're for ending
abortion and poverty, but support sending young men and women to die overseas
in order to spread Western civilization and Christianity (which utterly fails every
time).
The great issues of our
time are moral: the uses of power; wealth and poverty; human rights; the moral quality and character of society; loss of the sense of the common good
in tandem with the pampering of private interests; domestic violence; outrageous legal and medical costs
in a system of maldistributed services; unprecedented developments
in biotechnologies which portend good but risk evil; the violation of public trust by high elected officials and their appointees; the growing militarization of many societies; continued racism; the persistence of hunger and malnutrition; a still exploding population
in societies hard put to increase jobs and resources;
abortion; euthanasia; care for the environment; the claims of future generations.
But a serious analysis of survey data over
time provides little evidence that this fall's election cycle substantially shifted public opinion
in favor of legal
abortion.
Arkes agrees, precisely, that slavery and
abortion can be defended
in the «discourse» of natural rights; what he is concerned to assert is that the understanding of that discourse is destroyed by such defense —
in our
time as well as
in Lincoln's.
In an article on Think Progress, Zach Beauchamp cites a study by political scientists Thomas Carsey and Geoffrey Layman which shows that over
time, people often change their
abortion attitudes to match the political party they generally support.
«
In those
times, we knew about things that have become common today: the reality of
abortion, of people who manifest homosexual tendencies, whose personal dignity we always respected, but we were formed to see these acts as absolutely unacceptable, against the nature that God had created for us.»
I care about the life people like you are attempting to force
in to this world, you care about what appeases your god - big difference when you really don't care or consider the child only what your imaginary friend god wants and yet your god cause
abortions all the
time... you care about a clump of cells, not the actual life of the child and that's much worse than me supporting the rights of a woman to have control over her body, especially if the clump of cells couldn't survive outside of the host.
Orthodox converts told me that they find comfort
in the stability of the church, that positions on issues such as homosexuality and
abortion have already been decided and will not change any
time soon.
Varela said the Roman Catholic Church «has conferred to all the priests legitimately approved to hear sacramental confessions, who are
in the archdiocese of Madrid during August 15 to 22, the delegated power to remit during the sacrament of penance the excommunication... corresponding to the sin
abortion, to the faithful who are truly sorry, imposing at the same
time a convenient penance.»
@PUZZLED — well see my issus lies with the fact of how women were treated
in ancient
times — they were property and so allowing them to go thru all the emotionals and physicals of carrying and then giving birth only to toss it off a cliff isn't what i'd call good parenting — having an
abortion for many people who should NEVER have kids is (
in my opinion) good parenting!
This seems like an opportune
time to remind believers, you know, the ones with rules.about premarital s3x,
abortion and contraception, are responsible for 70 + % of all
abortions in the USA.
She told the Mail on Sunday: «Instead of listening to lobby groups, the BMA should be listening to British women, 70 per cent of whom want the
abortion time limit to be lowered from the current 24 weeks limit - one of the highest
in the Western world.»
The participants
in the
abortion debate seem, most of the
time, to presuppose that the beliefs (moral / scientific / religious / legal / philosophical) of the pro-choice and pro-life camps are widely divergent at many points.
At that
time, Lader was clearly
in favor of a complete liberalization of
abortion laws, and he repeatedly suggested throughout the book that the main impediment to such a liberalization was the power of the «Roman Catholic hierarchy.»
In our own time, the Supreme Court, in Roe v. Wade, struck down the abortion laws of all fifty states, effectively wiping out all legal protection of unborn human beings against being killed upon the request of their mother
In our own
time, the Supreme Court,
in Roe v. Wade, struck down the abortion laws of all fifty states, effectively wiping out all legal protection of unborn human beings against being killed upon the request of their mother
in Roe v. Wade, struck down the
abortion laws of all fifty states, effectively wiping out all legal protection of unborn human beings against being killed upon the request of their mothers.
Anika Rahman, Director of the International Program for CRLP, claimed,
in a letter to the Washington
Times (August 31, 2001), that «our lawsuit does not assert that the right to
abortion is a principle of international customary law.»
Norma McCorvey, left, was 22, unmarried, unemployed and pregnant for the third
time when
in 1969 she sought to have an
abortion in Texas, where the procedure was illegal except to save a woman's life.
Campaign Life 2017 is designed to gather together and mobilise people
in the cause of life, so that, by the
time the 50th anniversary of the passing of the
Abortion Act comes along on 27 October 2017, the pro-life movement
in Scotland will have a more powerful voice than ever.
Sister Andrea: Campaign Life 2017 is designed to gather together and mobilise people
in the cause of life, so that, by the
time the 50th anniversary of the passing of the
Abortion Act comes along on 27 October 2017, the pro-life movement
in Scotland will have a more powerful voice than ever.