Sentences with phrase «time issues before the court»

The Parent Education Program presents information concerning legal issues, child development, conflict resolution strategies and community resources for those who have custody and parenting time issues before the court.

The Parent Education Program presents information about legal issues, child development, conflict resolution & community resources for those who have custody & parenting time issues before the court.

Not exact matches

On June 11, 2015, the Court issued an order (the «Claims Procedure Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, 2015.

At almost the same time that he wrote the opinion sustaining the «bubble law,» Justice Stevens issued another opinion for the Court, this one invalidating a high school policy that permitted student - led prayer before football games.

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».

Her medical knowledge is helpful in the abuse / neglect cases brought in Family Court, in addition to understanding issues of substance abuse and mental illness also at times before the Court.

She has just a few more days to place the cats before her next court appearance on February 16, although APS or another unwelcome intervention could come at any time, and, if she still has «too many» cats, they could take even the ones she wants to keep before that issue can be argued in court.

«This is the first time this issue has been squarely before the courts and the first time before the Supreme Court of Canada,» Janes told Legal Feeds.

It is likely to be a very long time indeed before the UK court system and practitioners feel any impact arising from this issue.

While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before professors and submitted occasional written disputations on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinion.124

In a «pay to play» scenario, Hadfield describes a situation when a hypothetical private, for profit regulator would need a ruling from a California court before the private regulator is able to continue with its own regulatory process, but where the California court might take a long time to issue such a ruling.

Elliott who was to suffer considerable inconvenience and not less than four weeks of working life before another secretary could start took the rare yet commendable step of issuing a county court summons against [the lady] in which he claimed the cost of readvertising the position and one - and - a-half hours» reinterviewing time at his normal # 50 per hour charge rate.

The case comes before the court at a time of even greater focus on immigration issues, and with a president - elect who has promised to increase deportations.

We then had a hearing before a judge who issued an ruling confirming that I would not be allowed to address the court on this matter at any time.

The last time this sort of issue came before the Court of Appeal was in Henry v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 19, [2013] 2 All ER 840 where the court granted relief against sanctions under the pre-April regime but warned that it would all be different after 1 ACourt of Appeal was in Henry v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 19, [2013] 2 All ER 840 where the court granted relief against sanctions under the pre-April regime but warned that it would all be different after 1 Acourt granted relief against sanctions under the pre-April regime but warned that it would all be different after 1 April.

The James Elliott Construction case brings before the Court of Justice (ECJ), for the first time, the issue of whether it is within the Court's jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings on harmonised technical standards (HSs).

This applies both where that advice is limited in time, eg until after a criminal defence statement has been filed and served and, worse still, the advice is given not to make such a response at all; • (f) the date on which a party to care proceedings is to file and serve a criminal defence statement in linked criminal proceedings is wholly irrelevant to the court's determination of the date on which that party should file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement in the care proceedings; • (g) the mere fact that a party is ordered to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement before the date a criminal defence statement is to be filed and served in criminal proceedings is not a ground for failing to comply with the former order; • (h) it [is not] a ground for an application to extend the time for compliance with an order to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement until a date after the criminal defence statement has been filed and served; and • (i) any issue about alleged prejudice to a defendant in criminal proceedings based on him being required to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement before the date of a criminal defence statement is to be filed and served, or at all, only arises and is only potentially relevant if and when an application is made by the police and / or a co-accused for statements and documents filed in the family proceedings to be disclosed into linked criminal proceedings [see Re C (A Minor)(Care Proceedings: Disclosure)[1997] Fam 76, [1997] 2 WLR 322, sub nom Re EC (Disclosure of Material)[1996] 2 FLR 725, CA].

At the same time, she told the Court of Appeal it should not consider this issue because it was not addressed before the benchers panel by Zoraik's lawyer.

«This is a vexed issue for housing lawyers and has been before the courts three or four times.

Such a case would permit one to determine whether the view Grant advocated in her cert petition tracks her own view, but the issue does not appear to have come before the court again since that time — at least not in a form that has resulted in a written opinion.

Whilst it was correct that there was no such evidence before the Commercial Court, in fact criminal proceedings had been opened in Ukraine by the time of the hearing, and shortly afterwards Khrapunov was put on an international wanted list and an Interpol red notice was issued for his arrest.

The Times noted that this shift will likely have wide - ranging ramifications when the courts decide cases before them regarding health care, climate change, immigration reform, gay marriage, and other divisive issues.

Ultimately, I believe judges should emulate Justice Knazan the next time they are faced with a case that centres around Twitter (or Facebook, snapchat, kik, WhatsApp, LinkedIn, tumblr, instagram, Tinder, etc...) and put it to the participants in the matter to explain how the platform works, why the evidence should be accepted and what relevance any of it has to the legal issue before the court.

To the extent that Palmer suggests a generally applicable proposition that legislative purpose is irrelevant in constitutional adjudication, our prior cases — as indicated in the text — are to the contrary; and, very shortly after Palmer, all Members of the Court majority in that case joined the Court's opinion in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U. S. 602 (1971), which dealt with the issue of public financing for private schools and which announced, as the Court had several times before, that the validity of public aid to church - related schools includes close inquiry into the purpose of the challenged statute.

Many of the issues that were argued in the appeal are up for another hearing at the Court of Appeal, this time before a five - member panel in May 2018.

By the time the issue came before the court, the only issue was one of costs.

The court in this case considered three issues: i) how, under the existing legislation, the court should set a minimum term when imposing a sentence of imprisonment for public protection where it is imposed upon a prisoner who is already subject to and serving an existing custodial term; ii) How the court should approach, as a matter of principle, imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon someone who is already serving a sentence of imprisonment for public protection and whether in the circumstances of a case such as this some adjustment, if it is otherwise permissible, may be made to the term which he is destined to serve before release may be considered; and iii) how in such circumstances, if it is permissible to do either the first or second as a matter of principle, the court should approach the time spent in custody.

In the meantime, two further secondary market liability cases had come before the Court of Appeal on appeal: Green v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (2012 ONSC 3637), in which Justice Strathy reluctantly declined to certify a class action because it was time - barred by the three - year limitation period; and Silver v. IMAX (2012 ONSC 4881), in which Justice van Rensburg granted an order issuing retroactive leave under s. 138.8 of the OSA to allow the claim to proceed.

The issue before the Ontario Court of Appeal was whether the habitual residence of the two children had changed from Germany to Ontario during the period of the father's time - limited consent so that the children were habitually resident in Ontario on the date that the consent expired.

Also, the exchange of Financial Statements long before a court date will allow the parties» respective lawyers to provide accurate legal advice on matters such as the range of child or spousal support that may be owed from one spouse to another; this can reduce or even eliminate the time that a court would have to spend determining the issue.

The issues arose as to (i) whether or not the court could or should hear the secretary of state's appeals, in view of the fact that he was the successful appellant before the commissioner; and (ii) whether a social security commissioner had jurisdiction to hear and determine an appeal from an LQPM who had refused to extend time or had struck out a proposed appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The only exception to this is if the county that issued your ticket requires the use of timers, which means you have to take a certain amount of time to complete the course before it will pass in court.

Even though the Supreme Court ruled that Aereo can not sell a service that lets consumers reproduce TV signals in real time without a license, the court declined to rule on Aereo's DVR functions — that issue is currently before a federal judge in New Court ruled that Aereo can not sell a service that lets consumers reproduce TV signals in real time without a license, the court declined to rule on Aereo's DVR functions — that issue is currently before a federal judge in New court declined to rule on Aereo's DVR functions — that issue is currently before a federal judge in New York.

Back in early 2016, the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation failed to pursue all possible solutions to unlock the iPhone 5c owned by San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook before demanding Apple's help accessing the device, reports Reuters.The information was shared today in a report issued by the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General.According to the report, the FBI's in - house unit that handles breaking into mobile devices did not begin looking for outside help to unlock Farook's iPhone until the night before the FBI demanded Apple's help through a court filing.The FBI was aware that one of the vendors contacted at that point in time had «almost 90 percent completed» a technical solution that would allow the FBI access to the phone.

Judicial responses to alienation include: ordering an assessment; ordering supervised access on a permanent basis; intervention in the early stages of the dispute, before the problem has had time to become «true» alienation, or in the early years of a child's development; changing custody on a temporary basis; determining whether «pure» or «mixed» alienation is taking place; keeping the courts involved; suggesting counselling; making a finding of contempt; making a no - contact order; involving the Children's Aid Society; not making a parallel parenting order; meeting with the children; and in extreme cases, putting the alienating parent's actions on court record, in hopes that if the child revisits the issue as an adult, they may be able to see what actually took place.

The State appealed (unsuccessfully) on several issues that have featured many times before in Federal Court litigation.

If you can not agree on vacations or other time - sharing issues before the divorce is final, you may have to ask the court for a temporary order to address these issues.

The court takes no action before the case management date so that the spouses have some time to settle issues out of court.

This is the minimum amount of time that must pass before the court may finalize the separation; however, the process can take longer, especially if there are contested issues.

Divorce attorneys can save time, money and hassles by smoothing out any potential disagreements before the issues need to settled by a judge in a court decision.