Not exact matches
Using the word «tyranny» once and «absurd» nine
times,
Judge Orenstein
accused the DOJ of trying to use the authority of the All Writs Act to get through the courts what it couldn't get from Congress.
Anas will be in court for the first
time today since the hearing started to testify as well as be cross-examined by the counsel of the
accused judges.
Court Threatened To Discharge The
Accused Ones After 2 months of wasting the court's time this year, the trial judge, Her Honour, Ms. Afia Agbanu Kumador, threatened to discharge the 4 a
Accused Ones After 2 months of wasting the court's
time this year, the trial
judge, Her Honour, Ms. Afia Agbanu Kumador, threatened to discharge the 4
accusedaccused.
Albany County DA David Soares said that at the
time he
accused Judge Stephen Herrick of giving a «get - out - of - jail - free card for every criminal defendant in New York state» and creating a «dangerous loophole» by giving his high - profile steroids case to a special prosecutor in 2010, he saw nothing offensive in his words.
According to him, his administration was unfairly
judged when he was
accused of nepotism at a
time he had only one blood relation serving in his government in the person of Hon. Joyce Mogtari Bawa.
Syracuse, NY — The unexpected death of a
judge on the state's top court has delayed the perjury case against a former Syracuse principal
accused of lying about her role in an illegal
time - out room.
After the attorney general, John Mitchell,
accused The
Times of violating the Espionage Act, a
judge ordered it to stop publishing the papers.
(The BLT: The Blog of Legal
Times,
Judge Accuses D.C. of Discovery Violation «So Extreme As To Be Literally Unheard Of»)
A
judge declared a mistrial Tuesday in the trial against several a North Carolina church leader
accused of assaulting a man, resulting in jail
time for the jury foreman.
Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was
Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited —
Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was
Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between
accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was
accused and JC — Victim testified that
accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was
accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial
judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing —
Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was
Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine,
accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was
accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code —
Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was
Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial
judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample —
Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was
Accused was first
time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries —
Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was
Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was remote.
This article argues that it is
time for the SCSL to establish an independent fact finding commission, with a narrowly framed and
time limited mandate, to establish the truth, or falsity, of the allegation that Alternate
Judge Sow made during the delivery of the Taylor Trial judgment that there were no (serious) deliberations by the three
judges who convicted the
accused and sentenced him to 50 years imprisonment.
A Burnet County
judge who wrote it's «
time for a tree and a rope» in reference to a black man
accused of killing a police officer, told the State Commission on Judicial Conduct that the remark was a reference to a 1980s salsa commercial.
This was the first
time a uniformed police man had come into our family's home looking for an
accused, whereas usually the police would come to my family house as escorts to my uncles, who were Highly Positioned
Judges or statesmen.
The
judge explained that the
accused had spent two distinct periods of
time in...
R. v. P.C. 2014 ONCA 577 Civil Rights Summary: The
accused, a young offender at the
time, was tried by a
judge and jury and found guilty of manslaughter.
If a justice... makes an order under subsection 515 (2), (5), (6), (7), (8) or (12) or makes or vacates any order under paragraph 523 (2)(b), the
accused may, at any
time before the trial of the charge, apply to a
judge for a review
In a case where the
accused has been responsible for «unreasonable delay», the
judge may decide, depending on the length and reasons for the delay, that the only reason the
accused's detention exceeded the prescribed
time frame without a trial is because of the
accused's delay.
Lastly, in my discussions with the Crown through previous correspondence and during the meeting in chambers with the
Judge, I emphasized that I would seek to exclude the breath readings due to the improper administration of the roadside breath test which took place without any inquiry as to the
time of the
accused's last drink.
If a justice... makes an order under subsection 515 (2), (5), (6), (7), (8) or (12) or makes or vacates any order under paragraph 523 (2)(b), the
accused may, at any
time before the trial of the charge, apply to a
judge for a review of the order.
(1) A court of appeal or a
judge of that court may, at any
time, assign counsel to act on behalf of an
accused who is a party to an appeal or to proceedings preliminary or incidental to an appeal where, in the opinion of the court or
judge, it appears desirable in the interests of justice that the
accused should have legal assistance and where it appears that the
accused has not sufficient means to obtain that assistance.
For a number of reasons
judges had previously been allowed to provide more credit for pre-trial custody, in practical recognition of the poorer conditions, and the philosophical considerations that an
accused was not technically guilty during this
time.
[50] A presumptive ceiling is required in order to give meaningful direction to the state on its constitutional obligations and to those who play an important role in ensuring that the trial concludes within a reasonable
time: court administration, the police, Crown prosecutors,
accused persons and their counsel, and
judges.
Those in charge of Motorola's U.S. Twitter account have no
time for such nonsense,
judging by a tweet sent out
accusing rival Samsung of stealing its always - on display feature.