Sentences with phrase «time labour needs»

Not exact matches

Just as it was in the case of the cash cost of a residential property, this represents twice as many weeks of labour time needed to finance a mortgage as compared to the early 1970s.

Those who bought an average property in 1981 and 1982 (under these assumptions) needed 351 and 375 weeks of labour time to finance their home.

Current and recent buyers need to devote many more weeks of labour time to the financing of their home than their predecessors.

We think so, but we need convincing to believe that simply going to a labour based approach as proposed in the Jenkins report, along with decreasing the refundable portion of the credit over time are all that is needed to free up the monies and make the SR&ED incentives a truly effective instrument.

City haven't had an easy time particularly away from home this season, labouring to a 2 - 0 win at Brighton on the opening weekend and then needing a dramatic late winner at Dean Court to collect three points against Bournemouth.

At the same time, we, the community of women making choices around labour and delivery, desperately need this information.

, have the best chance of avoiding an epidural and / or a c - section, and be given much more time to labour - time, as it turned out, that I didn't need.

What you will need to include is your name, your labor partner's name, your doctor's name, your doula's name (if you have one), and your baby's name (if decided already), your due date, things you would like during labour i.e. if you would like ice chips for nourishment or want to be coached when it's time to push, what you would like when it comes to pain relief, i.e. if you want an epidural or not, things that you would like to happen straight after the birth, i.e. your partner to cut the cord, if you want to hold the baby straight away or after they've been cleaned up, special requests if you need to have a C - section, concerns and fears and anything else.

So you need antibiotics IN LABOUR to prevent the transmission of GBS, because it kills the bacteria in the vagina AT THE TIME OF DELIVERY.

Now's the time to gather together all the essentials you'll need during labour and birth and for after your baby is born.

We run Breastfeeding Support Groups on Wednesdays at Ouseburn Community Centre 1 pm — 2.30 pm and on Thursdays at St.. What to pack in your hospital bag Now's the time to gather together all the essentials you'll need during labour and birth and for after your baby is born.

, and her aura was not one which installed colempte confidence in me of her competence.Eventually, we reached a stage where the lead midwife announced that upon another examination (that we had been told was advisable due to the amount of time my partner had been in labour) that she would be calling in an ambulance as the baby was apparently taking longer to recover it «s heart rate between contractions than it had been previously which was a concern, and that my partner needed to be dealt with in hospital.The reassurance of the surroundings of home was soon replaced by a period of comparative chaos and strange faces which then developed into me travelling with my now scared and distressed partner in a speeding ambulance across a busy city road system amidst late afternoon traffic.

A Cochrane review found that: «Women who used epidurals were more likely to have a longer delivery (second stage of labour), needed their labour contractions stimulated with oxytocin, experienced very low blood pressure, were unable to move for a period of time after the birth (motor blockage), had problems passing urine (fluid retention) and suffered fever and association between epidural analgesia and instrumental birth.»

(A fault of New Labour was that, in 1996 - 97 it was sometimes good at broadening the sense of who was included in the nation to bring in those Tebbit seemed to reject, and its critics may not realise that this was important at the time, yet it also seemed to think it needed to reject those with an attachment to tradition or history to do so in the name of perennial New - ness.

«New Labour was right for its time but we need to move on, and all the attacks on me from the New Labour establishment have helped crystallise that message,» he argues.

«Looking back to the Tories in 97 and Labour in 2010, if they both needed a period of time in opposition to recuperate it didn't do them any good, did it?

The reason for this is that there are many more liberal parties in the UK Parliament than Conservative, and chances are that during motions that have to carry in parliament that need a majority conservatives will have a hard time passing laws if the Liberal Democrats, Green Party, SNP and Labour all vote against the Tories» motions.

David Blunkett, the former New Labour home secretary, says the debate so far has already established the need for «time to do this properly».

The Health Minister designate also pledged to engage labour union within the health sector to amicably address their concerns and where need be propose at least six months within which time issues that may arise will be dealt with.

Taking that into consideration, rather than essentially being a populist shield for Labour ministers, we need a grassroots, ground - up effort that will function independently of our leadership until such times as our leadership ceases to function independently of us».

It seems a long time ago since Diane Abbott was in the running to become the Labour candidate for mayor of London, but in the top spot this week is our report from last year on comments she made during her campaign in which she suggested the capital didn't need another white middle - aged man in charge.

I'm glad that the institutional innovations of Labour — Youth Offending Teams and the Youth Justice Board — both exist (for the time being anyway) and are able to do their valuable work in providing pre-sentencing support and advice, and where necessary, working to ensure young people in the secure estate are treated as children and that the secure estate recognises their particular needs and vulnerabilities as far as possible.

«At a time when Britain is led by a government which appears unable to recognise, let alone overcome, the enormous challenges facing it, Labour needs to be outward - looking, united and engaged with the issues that matter to voters,» said Progress.

A move to setting benefit rates to match the needs of local labour markets has been pushed by radical Tory councils but it is the first time that the frontbench has embraced the concept.

It's clear that we need to do something and that we can't change Labour rules quickly enough to do it this time around http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/a-primary-vote-for-labour-party-leader/

However, Blunkett said that Labour needed to spend more time focusing on its own problems before thinking about the next election:

Few seem to genuinely question the fact that such a coalition was both arithmetically difficult and lacked a significant degree of political will on the part of the Labour Party; nor does anyone seem to genuinely believe that a Tory minority administration would be either more progressive or provide the country with the stability it needs at a fragile time.

He performed poorly in a number of interviews, including on the World at One in early April, at a time when Labour needed to impress.

If Labour were going to win the 2015 election, something needed to change — and time was running out.

Following Labour's defeat at the polls in 2015, and at time when the Party is attempting to redefine its meaning, values and even identity, there is an urgent need for fresh thinking.

«That's a shared responsibility and a shared burden and you don't need to create a new faction in the Labour party which has been susceptible to entryists and which has at times resembled the mob.»

«There is good Ed Miliband and bad Ed Miliband, and we need good Ed Miliband — the friend of Stewart Wood and Marc Stears [two free - thinking aides, both Oxford academics]-- to triumph,» The Times quoted a Labour source saying a couple of months ago.

Right now, Labour needs to have a 20 - point advantage to be sure of an overall majority next time around.

The new group would need a rulebook, and might in the short term simply adopt the existing Labour Party rules, and amend these over time.

«If you believe in this country in a strong, united Labour party to strengthen our democracy and renew our country in these difficult times, join the Labour party, that's what we need to have.

The general election result — when the Conservative Treasury minister Jane Ellison was swept out of her Battersea seat after a 10 % swing to Labour — has given activists hope of taking Wandsworth for the first time in 40 years, but in several wards the party would need a significantly bigger swing to take the number of councillors needed for a majority.

But when the time comes, Gordon Brown will need to fight a very different Labour campaign from those of the last three elections.

He said: «At this critical time for our country following the EU referendum result we need strong and effective leadership of the Labour Party.

Whoever does it though would need to spend some proper time down in the places, meeting the whole membership and also local Labour supporters and hearing what they had to say.

Mr Harris added: «I am raising the possibility - the very slim possibility of my candidacy - because there are ideas that I have that I think the party should at least be debating, because by the time the next Scottish Parliament elections come up in 2016, we need to know what type of party Scottish Labour will be.»»

We need to work with outriders, take our time and — at all costs — avoid replicating the dangerous and failing strategy that Labour has pursued.

During the summer's hustings, he spoke often about the hard work Labour need to do to get back in power — now it's time to lead by example and start doing it.

How about that guy who stood for election on the basis that we «need a living breathing party ``, who thought last time round «Labour felt as if it was in government despite its members, not because of them ``?

At a time when we need to be rolling back Labour's bureaucratic legacy, Dromey has recently called for more regulation on the private rented sector, which would impose more burdensome red tape on good landlords across the country.

However, somehow I can imagine the smug and sanctimonious faces of Milliband, Harman etc saying no to an early election because «it's not required by law» or «Labour need time to fix the country».

She said they should stop being «political pundits» and added: «We don't want anybody who is part of Labour's team in Parliament giving people the impression we are anything other than completely focused on giving the help they need at this time.»

The more seats a party or grouping has, the more chance it has of forming a government - with 198 seats out of 646 the Conservative Party could only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13 MP's.

«The last time we had a good battling female Minister who stood up for Britain she was armed only with a handbag, yet with that one piece of equipment she came back with the biggest rebate we ever got: the rebate the Labour party stupidly gave away, and the rebate we need back.

I have to admit I am rather surprised at how early The Times has been so critical of Cameron - New Labour must be quite rattled if Alastair Campbell has felt the need to unleash the hounds so soon.

Mr Brown needs a distinctive policy agenda because he will need to fight a different Labour campaign next time.