Sentences with phrase «time on judicial review»

Such a restriction on raising matters for the first time on judicial review is, of course, familiar.

Not exact matches

In normal times the people may be content with representation and constitutional judicial review, while they largely focus on private affairs; while at times of what Bruce Ackerman calls constitutional politics the level of civic action may become extraordinary (Ackerman, 1991).

What we asking the Attorney General to do is to review its position on this matter, it may too late in a few weeks time and we will not forgive him if he goes to make a mockery of the Ghanaian judicial system at the African Court of Human and People's Rights.

Grayling made a second compromise on a Lords defeat, this time on the costs of groups helping fund the judicial review.

«Ministers are planning a new assault on what they condemn as the «growth industry» of time - wasting judicial reviews in the courts.

«Should the legislature attempt to comply with these broad directives, even if it were to be given time extensions, by enacting new legislation, then it would have made these broad changes based solely on the views of a single Superior Court judge, without review or consideration by higher judicial authority,» the appeal says.

Ms. Raczynska failed to name the correct party on her application for judicial review, and failed to repair this error or serve the Professional Corporation in the stipulated time frame (at paras 4, 5 citing Leon's Furniture Limited v Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner), 2011 ABCA 94).

However, Rule 3.15 is actually broader and stricter than the Limitations Act — it places an absolute time restriction on filing and service of an application for judicial review.

While there is fun to be had in figuring out what other branches of s. 96 will be recognized in future cases — time limits on judicial review, anyone?

Rule 3.15 of the Rules of Court provides that the Court lacks jurisdiction to extend the time for adding and serving a party on an application for judicial review:

(iii) In the instant case the parties, through inaction on the part of the solicitor was out of time to appeal by way of case stated, accordingly counsel advised judicial review.

The union filed for judicial review, arguing that vacation entitlement was determined on the basis of «service,» which included their time as casual employees.

In R (Casey) v Restormel BC [2007] EWHC 2544 (admin), [2007] All ER (D) 96 (Nov) the claimant sought judicial review of the authority's decision not to review its decision of intentional homelessness on the basis that the request for the review had been made out of time.

(judicial review arising from failures of due process in the Bar's disciplinary arrangements discovered by a report by COIC in 2012; time expired disciplinary judges — whether a tribunal «established by law» under ECHR Art. 6 and Art. 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights; whether Art 47 now has direct effect in UK; whether laid down selection process of disciplinary judges had to be followed at all; whether prosecutor could partake in selection process of disciplinary judges; whether a disciplinary judge could properly receive an undisclosed salary from the prosecutor; whether logjam in Visitorial appeals process caused unlawful delay; whether proper Art. 6 security of tenure when BSB sits on committee (COIC) with the power to remove disciplinary judges from the «pool» at will; whether «discreditable» conduct should be defined).

On 28 July 2011, the Competition Appeal Tribunal («CAT») gave judgment on the application by Ryanair Holdings plc («Ryanair») for judicial review of the decision by the Office of Fair Trading («OFT») that it would be in time (should it decide to take such a decision) to refer to the Competition Commission («CC») Ryanair's acquisition of a minority shareholding in Aer Lingus Group plc («Aer Lingus»On 28 July 2011, the Competition Appeal Tribunal («CAT») gave judgment on the application by Ryanair Holdings plc («Ryanair») for judicial review of the decision by the Office of Fair Trading («OFT») that it would be in time (should it decide to take such a decision) to refer to the Competition Commission («CC») Ryanair's acquisition of a minority shareholding in Aer Lingus Group plc («Aer Lingus»on the application by Ryanair Holdings plc («Ryanair») for judicial review of the decision by the Office of Fair Trading («OFT») that it would be in time (should it decide to take such a decision) to refer to the Competition Commission («CC») Ryanair's acquisition of a minority shareholding in Aer Lingus Group plc («Aer Lingus»).

On 28 July 2011, the Competition Appeal Tribunal («CAT») gave judgment on the application by Ryanair Holdings plc («Ryanair») for judicial review of the decision by the Office of Fair Trading («OFT») that it would be in time (should it decide to take such a decision) to refer to the Competition Commission («CC») Ryanair's acquisition -LSB-..On 28 July 2011, the Competition Appeal Tribunal («CAT») gave judgment on the application by Ryanair Holdings plc («Ryanair») for judicial review of the decision by the Office of Fair Trading («OFT») that it would be in time (should it decide to take such a decision) to refer to the Competition Commission («CC») Ryanair's acquisition -LSB-..on the application by Ryanair Holdings plc («Ryanair») for judicial review of the decision by the Office of Fair Trading («OFT») that it would be in time (should it decide to take such a decision) to refer to the Competition Commission («CC») Ryanair's acquisition -LSB-...]

James also spent eighteen months» part - time secondment in - house with the Natural England Legal team, which included advising on large - scale renewable energy projects, large - scale infrastructure projects, a judicial review and environmental site designations.

The time limit for seeking judicial review can be either 15 or 60 days from the decision's receipt, depending on the location of the refusing officer.

My SLAW post on 14 November last reported on a speech Sumption made about that time on the dangers of the widening scope of judicial review.

At the same time, the Board was aware that on judicial review proceedings, transcripts were being asked for by affluent parties and not by others.

Indirect operational costs consist of the resources that are expended due to the existence of judicial review, but not on judicial review as such — for example, the time that I spend on writing this post, and the time you expend on reading it, which might have been spent on more socially productive (if not more enjoyable!)