Sentences with phrase «time the children reside»

The amount of support is determined using a guideline formula that looks at a number of factors including, number of children requiring support, percentage of time the children reside with each parent, gross income of each parent from all sources, health insurance payments, and childcare costs.

In a shared custody arrangement, the percentage of time the children reside with each parent can change the rules for child support.

However, the amount of time the children reside with each parent could affect the amount of child support payable.

Not exact matches

With my ex-husband permanently residing in Asia, I received full physical custody of my three children who were 11, 10 and six at the time of my separation.

Being physically inactive is even more likely for low - income children, who are three times less likely to participate than children who reside in higher - income households.

Datasets also commonly fail to identify other parent - child relationships across households: for example, parents with children residing part - time elsewhere; partners who parent children together, while not cohabiting full - time; and non-resident step - parents.

«Siblings of children with disability were more likely than siblings residing with typically developing children to have problems with interpersonal relationships, psychopathological functioning, functioning at school, and use of leisure time,» according to a 2013 study.

«Throughout this time, I have been honored to win the overwhelming support of the people Rita and I grew up with, and the people our children grew up with, and the wonderful people who reside in these great and diverse communities.

«It is unbelievable that the law doesn't protect all children through 1,000 feet residency restrictions because pre-kindergartens are not considered «schools» under the law or continues to allow these ticking time bombs to reside next door to children in shelters,» Klein said in a statement praising Cuomo for including the measure as a part of the budget.

It is unbelievable that the law doesn't protect all children through 1,000 feet residency restrictions because pre-kindergartens are not considered «schools» under the law or continues to allow these ticking time bombs to reside next door to children in shelters.

They reside in Southern California where they enjoy spending time with their grown children and grandchildren.

While Derrick's responsibilities require him to spend considerable time in both Author Solutions» Bloomington and Cebu offices, he officially resides in Bloomington, Indiana, with his wife and four children.

As used in this paragraph, a «Covered Borrower» means any person who, at the time such person becomes obligated on a loan transaction or establishes an account for consumer credit, satisfies the requirements under any one or more of the following classifications, or is otherwise under applicable laws deemed to be a «Covered Borrower» under the Military Lending Act, 10 U.S. Code Section 987: (a) An active duty member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force or Coast Guard, or a person serving on active Guard and Reserve duty (a person described in this clause (a) of the definition of «Covered Borrower» is hereinafter referred to as a «Service Member»); or (b) Any of the following persons, relative to a Service Member: (1) The spouse; (2) A child under the age of 21; or (3) If dependent on the Service Member for more than one half of such person's support, any one or more of the following persons: (i) A child under the age of 23 enrolled in a full time course of study at an institution of higher learning; (ii) A child of any age incapable of self support due to a mental or physical incapacity that occurred before attaining age 23 while such person was dependent on the Service Member; (iii) Any unmarried person placed in legal custody of the Service Member who resides with such Service Member unless separated by military service or to receive institutional care or under other circumstances covered by Regulation; or (iv) A parent or parent - in - law residing in the Service Member's household.

Stella dedicates her time to bringing love and joy to developmentally disabled adults and children residing at not - for - profit Richmond Community Services in New York.

She currently resides in Willistown Township with her husband, two children, crazy dog, and a family cat who spends much of her time inside the leg of their air hockey table.

The parties were residing in Surrey and the father had equal parenting time with the child.

Physical custody, which means where children reside, may be an equal and shared physical custody arrangement where a child's time is evenly split between two homes, or an arrangement where the child resides with the primary custodial parent and the visitation schedule allows for parenting time with the non-custodial parent.

For example, while parents may have «joint custody» (joint decision making ability) the children may actually reside primarily with one parent for most of the time and a child's residence is determinative of who will be the Payer or Recipient, of child support.

• The deceased's surviving spouse if they were married at the time of death; • The deceased's surviving domestic partner; • The deceased's surviving children; • People who would be entitled to the deceased's property as if he or she did not have a will; • The deceased's putative spouse, the children of the putative spouse, parents, or stepchildren of the deceased; • A minor that resided with the deceased for 180 days in the deceased's home and was dependent on him or her for at least half of their support; or • A personal representative of the deceased.

The Court agreed with the majority of jurisdictions in finding a child has a «significant connection» with New Hampshire when one parent still resides in state and exercises more than de minimis parenting time in New Hampshire.

-- the petition of the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, a petitioner, requesting an investigation into whether Item 1 of Paragraph 1 of Article 1 and Item 1 of Paragraph 1 of Article 17 of the Republic of Lithuania's Law on Citizenship to the extent that it provides that the persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren (provided that said persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have not repatriated), who are residing in other states, shall retain the right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania for an indefinite period of time, and whether Paragraph 2 of Article 2 of the Republic of Lithuania's Law on the Implementation of the Law on Citizenship are not in conflict with Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 29 and Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 12 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, and with the constitutional principles of justice and a state under the rule of law.

-- the provision «the following persons shall retain the right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania for an indefinite period of time: (1) persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren (provided that said persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have not repatriated), who are residing in other states» of Paragraph 1 (wording of 17 September 2002) of Article 17 of the Law on Citizenship, to the extent that, according to the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, a petitioner, it entrenches that the right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania shall not be retained to the persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren, provided that said persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have repatriated, and who are residing in other states, is not in conflict with Article 29 and Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 12 of the Constitution and with the constitutional principles of justice and a state under the rule of law;

The Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, a petitioner, requests an investigation into whether Item 1 of Paragraph 1 of Article 1 and Item 1 of Paragraph 1 of Article 17 of the Law on Citizenship, to the extent that it provides that the persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren (provided that said persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have not repatriated), who are residing in other states, shall retain the right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania for an indefinite period of time, and whether Paragraph 2 of Article 2 of the Law on the Implementation of the Law on Citizenship are not in conflict with Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 29 and Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 12 of the Constitution, and with the constitutional principles of justice and a state under the rule of law.

Having held that the provision «provided that these persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have not repatriated» of Item 1 (wording of 17 September 2002) of Paragraph 1 of Article 17 of the Law on Citizenship is in conflict with Article 29 of the Constitution and with the constitutional principle of a state under the rule of law, the Constitutional Court will not further investigate whether the provision «the following persons shall retain the right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania for an indefinite period of time: (1) persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren (provided that said persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have not repatriated), who are residing in other states» of Paragraph 1 (wording of 17 September 2002) of Article 17 of this law to the extent that, according to the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, a petitioner, it entrenches that the right to citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania shall not be retained to persons who held citizenship of the Republic of Lithuania prior to 15 June 1940, their children, grandchildren and great - grandchildren who reside in other states, provided that these persons, their children, grandchildren or great - grandchildren have repatriated, is not in conflict with Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 12 of the Constitution and with the constitutional principle of justice.

And if the child is primarily residing with one parent, the court will give the other parent appropriate visitation time.

In a primary residence arrangement, the child resides with one parent and the other is will have parenting time, unless the contact with the parent is deemed unhealthy or unsafe.

There is a rebuttable presumption that continuing the current allocation of decision making under a legal custody order or continuing the child's physical placement with the parent with whom the child resides for the greater period of time is in the best interest of the child.

A shared parenting arrangement would apply if the child resides with each parent more than 40 percent of the time.

If the parent proposing the move or removal has sole legal or joint legal custody of the child and the child resides with that parent for the greater period of time or the parents have substantially equal periods of physical placement with the child, as an alternative to the petition, motion or order to show cause under par.

(3) Whether disrupting the contact between the child and the person with whom the child resides a majority of the time would be more detrimental to the child than disrupting contact between the child and the person objecting to the relocation;

If the court finds it is not in the best interests of the child to relocate as defined herein, but the parent with whom the child resides the majority of the time elects to relocate, the court shall make a custody determination and shall consider all relevant factors including the following where applicable:

The party who is intending to relocate with the child to a residence that substantially changes the geographical ties between the child and the other party shall provide the other party with written notice as soon as practicable of his or her intent to relocate, the location where the party intends to reside, the reason for the relocation, and a proposed revised parenting time plan.

If a child resides with the custodial parent 100 percent of the time, the award is defined under Appendix IX - F and the sole parenting worksheet Appendix IX - C.

The practical challenge with giving time - limited consents an expansive interpretation is that this might undermine future parental consent (albeit for a time - limited period) for a child to travel to, or to reside on a temporary basis, in a different country from the child's habitual residence.

It is the parent with whom the child resides full time or a majority of the time.

Physical custody means that the child resides with the parent that has physical custody more than 50 percent of the time.

A parent who has legal custody, resides with the child, or has parenting time with the child, must give the other parent written notice at least 30 days prior to changing residences with the child or removing the child from the state for more than 90 days.

In these situations, for example, one parent will have the child reside with her / him most of the time and the other parent will get parenting time which is often every other weekend or a few days a month.

a) the respondent was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted; b) the respondent has submitted to the jurisdiction either expressly or by defending on the merits of the case without objecting to the jurisdiction at the first available opportunity; c) the creditor was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted; d) the child for whom maintenance was ordered was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted, provided that the respondent has lived with the child in that State or has resided in that State and provided support for the child there; e) except in disputes relating to maintenance obligations in respect of children, there has been agreement to the jurisdiction in writing by the parties; or f) the decision was made by an authority exercising jurisdiction on a matter of personal status or parental responsibility, unless that jurisdiction was based solely on the nationality of one of the parties.

When the non-custodial parent is in the area where the child resides, or when the child is in the area where the non-custodial parent resides, liberal parenting time shall be allowed.

Since the children were residing in Ontario with their mother and with the consent of their father for an «appreciable period of time» (para. 24), their habitual residence had changed.

The question of habitual residence is a question of fact, decided on all the circumstances; habitual residence is the place where the person resides for an appreciable period of time with a «settled intention» a settled intention or purpose is an intent to stay in a place whether temporarily or permanently for a particular purpose; and a child's habitual residence is tied to that of the child's custodian (s)(Korutowska - Wooff, at para 8).

The children reside permanently with the parent who has custody and the other parent is granted access to the children at agreed times, which can include overnight access.

May order the parent who did not provide time - sharing or did not properly exercise time - sharing under the time - sharing schedule to have the financial burden of promoting frequent and continuing contact when that parent and child reside further than 60 miles from the other parent.

You can also ask that your ex-spouse pay child support up to age 25 if the child is attending college or university full - time and continues to reside with you.

While your child is an adult, and may not reside under the same roof as you and your new spouse, a marriage will impact the time you spend with that child.

If the time - sharing plan provides for equal time - sharing, health insurance is accessible to the child if the health insurance is available to be used in either county where the child resides or in another county if both parents agree.

This will outline the amount of time each parent will spend with the children, where the children will reside and what unique needs the family may have.

If the parent proposing to move has sole or joint legal custody of the child and the child resides with that parent for the majority of time, the noncustodial parent can attempt to stop the move by filing paperwork with the court.

If the parent proposing the move or removal has sole legal or joint legal custody of the child and the child resides with that parent for the greater period of time, the parent objecting to the move or removal may file a petition, motion or order to show cause for modification of the legal custody or physical placement order affecting the child.