Sentences with phrase «time under a court order»

Additionally, the court may consider if either parent has been convinced of a felony or domestic violence, or if either parent has been denied parenting time under a court order.

Not exact matches

The government says over time some actions have been taken by the communities under state pressure to end the discrimination but that federal authorities are seeking a court order to prevent future discrimination by the defendants.

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».

a) Disputes filed - 18 months b) Inquiries - 2 years c) Payment profile -5 years d) Information related to a consumers payment behavior such as slow payer, defaulted or absconded - 1 year e) Information relating to the action that a credit provider has taken against a consumer to enforce a debt such as handed over, legal action or write - off - 2 years f) Debt restructuring - Until a clearance certificate is given g) Civil court judgments - 5 years or until the court removes it h) Administration orders (orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt judgments - 5 years or until the court removes it h) Administration orders (orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt removes it h) Administration orders (orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Afcourt where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South AfCourt order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Africa.

(1.1) At any time after five years after a bankrupt who has a debt referred to in paragraph (1)(g) ceases to be a full - or part - time student, as the case may be, under the applicable Act or enactment, the court may, on application, order that subsection (1) does not apply to the debt if the court is satisfied that

The operative time for a payment split under a court order means the time specified in the order.

No provision of a marital property agreement, unilateral statement under Section 766.59 of the Wisconsin Statutes, or court order under Section 766.70 of the Wisconsin Statutes adversely affects the interest of the creditor unless the creditor, prior to the time the credit is granted, is furnished a copy of the agreement, statement or decree or has actual knowledge of the adverse provision when the obligation to the creditor is incurred.

According to the New York Times, the EPA is under orders from the Supreme Court to determine «whether carbon dioxide is a pollutant that endangers public health and welfare.»

Once possession proceedings have been started, the court has an opportunity under Administration of Justice Act 1970 (AJA 1970), s 36 (amended by AJA 1973, s 8) to exercise its discretion to adjourn or stay the proceedings, or suspend an order for possession, if it appears that the borrower is likely, within a reasonable period of time, to pay the mortgage arrears.

Heartless bypass The ECtHR stated in its judgment that had the authority sought to evict the husband under the Housing Act 1985, s 84, it would have been open to him to ask the court to determine whether or not the wife had really left the home because of domestic violence and whether or not, in his personal circumstances, including his need to provide accommodation for his children during overnight visits several time a week, it was reasonable to grant a possession order.

Parental involvement s 11 On an opposed application to make, vary or discharge an order under s 8 of the Children Act 1989, or where the court is considering whether or not to make a parental responsibility order, a rebuttable presumption is raised that involvement of the parents — of some direct or indirect kind but not any particular division of a child's time — will further the child's welfare.

HAMALENGWA — Findings of Professional Misconduct — While representing a difficult client who was charged with first degree murder, the Lawyer was eligible to bill the Ministry of the Attorney General for fees and disbursements pursuant to a Fisher order — The Lawyer's accounting, billing and docketing systems were deplorable and bore no relationship to his billings to the Ministry — The Lawyer engaged in professional misconduct by billing the Ministry for attendances at court when he had not attended or attended for less time than he claimed; overbilling for legal research; billing for services that were not properly billable as legal services; overbilling for student assistance disbursements he had not incurred; overbilling for fees and disbursements that were not fair and reasonable; and submitting a document to the Ministry purporting to be an invoice from a student working under his direction when the invoice was not prepared by the student and the services were not rendered as described in the document.

It is an alternative to a docket appearance in court before a judge when an applicant files a claim for a parenting order, guardianship order, contact order or an order to enforce time with a child under the Family Law Act.

An order, under s 19 (1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, for costs incurred as a result of an unnecessary or improper act or omission by or on behalf of a prosecutor may be made to compensate an unrepresented defendant for his own loss of time in preparing his case and attending court.

Under the Family Law Act or the Divorce Act, a court can order a support payor to designate the support recipient as the irrevocable beneficiary of a life insurance policy to ensure funds exist at the time of the payor's death to satisfy his (or her) support obligations specified in the support order.

If no payment is required by paragraph 1, an additional payment to the insured person's dependants and the persons, other than a former spouse of the insured person, to whom the insured person had an obligation at the time of the accident to provide support under a domestic contract or court order, to be divided equally among the persons entitled, of,

«Having considered the decisions, the writings and the various aspects of the public interest which claim attention, I have come to the conclusion that the court should state the relevant principle as follows: a document which was produced or brought into existence either with the dominant purpose of its author, or of the person or authority under whose direction, whether particular or general, it was produced or brought into existence, of using it or its contents in order to obtain legal advice or to conduct or aid in the conduct of litigation, at the time of its production in reasonable prospect, should be privileged and excluded from inspection.»

The recent first instance decisions in Imperial Cancer, FG Hawkes v Beli Shipping and Sodastream v Coates have all contributed to the development of what will constitute a sufficiently good reason for the court to order an extension of time for service of a claim form under CPR 7.6.

If no payment is required by paragraph 1, an additional payment to the insured person's dependants and the persons, other than a former spouse of the insured person, to whom the insured person had an obligation at the time of the accident to provide support under a domestic contract or court order, to be divided equally among the persons entitled, in an amount equal to $ 25,000 if the accident occurred before October 1, 2003 or, if the accident occurred on or after October 1, 2003,

I and my ex spouse agreed under a separation agreement incorporated, merged into and made part of the court order for a settlement of Child Support, Spouse Support and Medical Support of $ 1,036,570.00 USD he has only paid $ 350,500.00 February 18th, 2013 but still owing $ 686,070.00 and the stipulated time for the completion of payment May 17th, 2013 has long elapsed.

28 The Small Claims Court may order the times and the proportions in which money payable under an order of the court shall be Court may order the times and the proportions in which money payable under an order of the court shall be court shall be paid.

However, the court would review the following four issues if challenged by the respondent: (1) whether the foreign court lacks jurisdiction pursuant to Taiwanese laws; (2) whether a default judgment is rendered against the losing defendant, but the notice or summons of the initiation of action had been legally served in a reasonable time in the foreign country or had been served through judicial assistance provided under the Taiwanese laws; (3) whether the performance ordered by such judgment or its litigation procedure is against Taiwanese public policy or morals; and (4) whether there exists no mutual recognition between the foreign country and Taiwan.

After pointing out that the husband would have an easier time satisfying his hefty support arrears without a bankruptcy trustee in the way — and after taking pains to clarify that such a discharge would have no effect on the wife's support entitlement (since by law a discharge does not release a person from child / spousal support or maintenance obligation arising under a court order), the court ordered him to pay $ 25,000 to the trustee immediately.

Similarly anyone under the age of 18 years at the time of sentence who is subject to the notification requirements for 6 years must remain subject to these requirements for 4 years before they can apply to the court for a discharge of the order.

However, if Chris has acquired parental responsibility at the time of Janet's death, Lisa's appointment will not take effect unless Chris dies or his parental responsibility is terminated (for example, by a Court Order) while Melissa is under 18.

Once the victim is granted exclusive possession under a protection or other court order for a specified period of time, then during that period of time the perpetrator would almost certainly have no right to a key or access to the residential premises, regardless of what the RTA says.

Finally, when considering whether the Lord Chancellor had complied with the public sector equality duty under section 149 of the EqA when introducing the Fees Order, the Court of Appeal considered that the equality impact assessment carried out at the relevant time was adequate to meet that duty.

(6.1) If the mediation co-ordinator does not, within the time provided by an order under subrule (1) or a consent under subrule (3), receive a notice under clause (5)(a), a mediator's report or a notice that the action has been settled, and the action is set down for trial, he or she shall immediately assign a mediator from the list, unless the court orders otherwise.

One of the enhanced powers under Rule 20.04 (2.2) is that the Court may order that oral evidence be presented by one of more parties, with or without time limits on its presentation, in order to weigh the evidence, evaluate credibility of a deponent or draw a reasonable inference from the evidence.

Commentary on this new provision has argued that the new law shifts the burden from counsel for the deponent, who formerly had to seek a protective order from the court to avoid an excessively long deposition, to the counsel of the party taking the deposition, who will soon have to secure the agreement of the other parties or obtain an order from the court to obtain more than 7 hours of deposition time under specific circumstances.

[115] I conclude that the legislature intended the Forest Act to apply to lands under claims for Aboriginal title, up to the time title is confirmed by agreement or court order.

104 (1) Subject to the provisions of the Constitution, the Chief Justice may by order under his hand transfer a case at any stage of the proceedings from any Judge or Magistrate to any other Judge or Magistrate and from one court to another court of competent jurisdiction at any time or stage of the proceedings and either with or without an application from any of the parties to the proceedings.

Some courts may find it desirable in modification proceedings to gradually implement the Guideline order over a period of time, especially where support computed under the Guideline is considerably higher than the amount previously paid.

Under the loser - pays BC Supreme Court rules the Plaintiff was ordered to pay the Defendant's costs and double costs from the time of the second offer onwards.

In the meantime, two further secondary market liability cases had come before the Court of Appeal on appeal: Green v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (2012 ONSC 3637), in which Justice Strathy reluctantly declined to certify a class action because it was time - barred by the three - year limitation period; and Silver v. IMAX (2012 ONSC 4881), in which Justice van Rensburg granted an order issuing retroactive leave under s. 138.8 of the OSA to allow the claim to proceed.

This appeal considered whether, when a confiscation order is made under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994, the words «the said sum... as was due at the time of the period of detention was imposed» in s 79 (2) of the 1980 Act mean the sum due when the default term was fixed by the Crown Court judge or the sum due when the default term was activated by the Magistrates» Court.

The Supreme Court concluded that there is no unfairness caused by any of the differences between the earlier regime and the regime under the 2002 Act where the 2002 Act regime is applied only to post-commencement offences, because the rules which are being applied are those which were in force, and publicly known, at the time the offences generating the confiscation order were committed.

At any time after the filing of a joint case conference report, or not sooner than 10 days after a party has filed a separate case conference report, or upon order by the court or discovery commissioner, any party who has complied with Rule 16.1 (a)(1) may obtain discovery by one or more of the following additional methods: depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property under Rule 34 or Rule 45 (a)(1)(C), for inspection and other purposes; physical and mental examinations; and requests for admission.

15 (1) On application, a judge of the Supreme Court may by order shorten or extend the time for doing anything under this Part.

(6) In any proceeding under this section, the court may not deny shared parental responsibility and time - sharing rights to a parent solely because that parent is or is believed to be infected with human immunodeficiency virus, but the court may, in an order approving the parenting plan, require that parent to observe measures approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States Public Health Service or by the Department of Health for preventing the spread of human immunodeficiency virus to the child.

Under the law, the court will change a custody order only if circumstances have changed since the time the original order was in place and if it is in the best interest of the child to modify the custody arrangement.

One of the spouses was under the age of 16 at the time of the marriage unless there was a court order allowing marriage between ages 14 - 16 when the woman is pregnant.

the court must consider making an order under paragraph (1)(b) to compensate the person for the time the person did not spend with the child (or the time the child did not live with the person) as a result of the contravention.

Elsewhere, in Moist v. Moist, the Dauphin County trial court held that a shared custody order in which Father exercised custody 45 % of the children's time constituted an «unusual amount of time» under Rule 1910.16 - 5 (m).

(1) When the intended relocation of the child is within the school district in which the child currently resides the majority of the time, the person intending to relocate the child, in lieu of notice prescribed in RCW 26.09.440, may provide actual notice by any reasonable means to every other person entitled to residential time or visitation with the child under a court order.

(2) A person who is entitled to residential time or visitation with the child under a court order may not object to the intended relocation of the child within the school district in which the child currently resides the majority of the time, but he or she retains the right to move for modification under RCW 26.09.260.

In Massachusetts, the Probate and Family Court official time - standard for contested divorces is fourteen months (under Standing Order 1 - 06)-- that is, the divorce process, from filing to entry of a judgment, should take no more than fourteen months.

If a divorce, dissolution, legal separation, or annulment proceeding involves a child and if the court has not issued a shared parenting decree, the court shall make a just and reasonable order or decree permitting each parent who is not the residential parent to visit the child at the time and under the conditions that the court directs, unless the court determines that it would not be in the best interest of the child to permit that parent to visit the child.

(a) «Child» means any person who is under the jurisdiction of a state court pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act or is the subject of any order granting to a parent or other person any right to time - sharing, residential care, kinship, or custody, as provided under state law.

For children under age 3 at the time of the divorce, the court considers the child's age, needs, emotions, and attachment to both parents when setting a possession and access order.