A while back Cardinal Schonborn's op - ed in The New York
Times about evolution and design caused that newspaper's editors to raise the spectre of past debates between science and religion (7/7/05, p. A27 and 7/9/07, p. A1).
TheCapitalist As I stated a few pages back, creationists lie all
the time about evolution, and I don't think they could have been so thorough with their misrepresentation of evolution unless they had the correct understanding of the theory from which to work with.
There is an interesting article in the New York
Times about evolutions role in finding a partner.
Not exact matches
The genius of first -
time screenwriter Liz Hannah's script is that she makes the story
about Graham's
evolution as much as it is
about the Pentagon Papers.
Those moments often occur around the
time that online shopping reaches
about 20 percent of total national retail spending in a category, the research firm L2 has concluded after studying the
evolution of e-commerce.
Evolution says NOTHING
about the origin of life, simply how it has changed over
time.
Evolution makes predictions
about what we would expect to see in the fossil record, comparative anatomy, genetic sequences, geographical distribution of species, etc., and these predictions have been verified many
times over.
Interestingly, the
Times story does not mention the North American Man - Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), an organization that has the merit of being utterly straightforward on a subject
about which the
Times, at least at this point in its political
evolution, feels compelled to be somewhat coy.
God controls all of life and all of
evolution, he isn't worried
about time as he is eternal and
time isn't an issuefor him.
If you want to get a sneak peek at what the Christian community will be talking
about in 5 - 10 years, just spend some
time on a Christian college campus.From
evolution to religious pluralism to homosexuality, the issues that play out on the national scene often begin in classrooms, late - night dorm room discussions, and chapel services.
Old debates
about evolution often turned on the question of whether a million monkeys could accidentally type Hamlet in a given amount of
time.
Evolution is a bankrupt theory whose
time is just
about up.
Part of that
evolution is an increase in the average height of humans since this
time period, by
about 8 to 10 inches.
The
Evolution of Adam: What the Bible Does and Doesn't Say
About Human Origins by Peter Enns — This book came along and just the right
time for me.
At the
time, the majority of the science faculty espoused young earth creationism, so I learned
about evolution in the context of Christian apologetics courses, with the presupposition that
evolution was incompatible with the Christian faith.
The programs taught me
about (1) admitting I was beat, (2) coming to believe in something greater than myself (eventually a higher power)(many
evolutions and concepts of HP, all of these at one
time or another: nature, the 12 steps, creator, Love, spiritual principles)(Step 3) applying my low self worth and gigantic Ego to these spiritual principles (4) write down my liabilities and assets (5) share them with another and my higher power (6 & 7) ask for the liabilites to be removed and be patient with the process (8) Make a list of all that were harmed by me (9) make amends to such folks except whn to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking for snafus, mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer to communicate to my higher power and quiet reflection to listen for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help others if they wish for help because now I am in the position to assist.
Now think
about going back in
time 5 thousand years and explaining 21st century
evolution theories.
It seems that a whole lot of people, both Christians and non-Christians, are under the impression that you can't be a Christian and vote for a Democrat, you can't be a Christian and believe in
evolution, you can't be a Christian and be gay, you can't be a Christian and have questions
about the Bible, you can't be a Christian and be tolerant of other religions, you can't be a Christian and be a feminist, you can't be a Christian and drink or smoke, you can't be a Christian and read The New York
Times, you can't be a Christian and support gay rights, you can't be a Christian and get depressed, you can't be a Christian and doubt.
It is interesting to me to think
about evolution, where things change over long periods of
time and where there may only be theories
about the catalysts, in contrast to those that we have put on the fast - track ourselves, such as those you have exemplified.
And let's remember that
evolution, while it's a theory, is a theory
about the beginning and the transformation of life based on things we have observed, namely that cells change and mutate and that those mutations can produce cells that are unique and new, and that it would follow that it's possible for molecules to form into single - celled organisms which mutate and combine into multi-cellular organisms which mutate, adapt, and grow over
time into new forms of life.
According to Tickle, we are living through one of those pivotal
times right now as changes related to biology (
evolution), physics, psychology, higher criticism, and the Information Age raise serious questions
about the Bible, religious pluralism, authority, and faith.
That said, I've still got a lot to learn
about evolution, and I've honestly never been that good at science, so it's going to take some
time.
The post that follows, originally published May 29, 2013, is
about the
evolution of their relationship over
time.
So, if there's
evolution, it's
about the
evolution of your own family over
time
We've talked several
times in these pages
about Facebook's continuing
evolution into a pay - to - play medium for brands, nonprofits and other Page owners, and the trend seems clear.
Podcast host Steve Mirsky talks with human
evolution expert Kate Wong
about the small group of humans who survived tough
times beginning
about 195,000 years ago and gave rise to all of us, a story told in the cover article of the August issue of Scientific American, our 165th anniversary edition.
«It's all
about the
time scale over which
evolution occurs in relation to the
timing of the changes now occurring in the environment, because there are likely to be mismatches,» he said.
Many people — obviously we're living in a
time where
evolution is under fire and a lot of people, even people who accept
evolution, don't necessarily see why it's so important that it's studied, but when you are talking
about...
Researchers suddenly had many more options at their disposal, according to physicist Douglas Stanford of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J. «You can analyze things
about a black hole you couldn't any other way, like the
time evolution of the system,» he says.
Their work has helped address hypotheses
about Neandertal
evolution, specifically the accretion model hypothesis, which suggests that Neandertals evolved their defining features at different
times, not in a single linear sweep.
Biological invasions pose major threats to biodiversity, but little is known
about how
evolution might alter their impacts over
time.
The discovery in Argentina is the first
time a dromaeosaur — the group that includes raptors — has been identified in South America, and its presence there could change what we know
about the
evolution of flight.
Neuroscientists have long wondered why the brain has a region exclusively dedicated to reading — a skill that is unique to humans and only developed
about 5,400 years ago, which is not enough
time for
evolution to have reshaped the brain for that specific task.
While the new discovery confirms scientists» ideas
about the
evolution of disease, the worrying implication is that the same process could cause other virulent strains of cholera to emerge at any
time.
Now, researchers reporting in Current Biology on August 24 think they know why that call feature has arisen multiple
times over the course of
evolution: it improves the ability of listeners to detect call components that provide important identifying information
about a caller.
Theories of stellar
evolution predict that stars weighing less than
about 25
times the mass of the sun end up as neutron stars, while heftier stars are destined to become black holes.
For the first
time, the genomes of the giraffe and its closest living relative, the reclusive okapi of the African rainforest, have been sequenced — revealing the first clues
about the genetic changes that led to the
evolution of the giraffe's exceptionally long neck and its record - holding ranking as the world's tallest land species.
The stars may be passing through a stage of stellar
evolution that lasts no more than a few tens of thousands of years, the scientists say — a phase between red giants (
about 30 or 40
times the size of our sun) and blue subdwarfs (stars
about one - fifth the size of our sun but seven
times hotter and 70
times brighter).
Scally's group comes up with a date of
about 6 million years ago, adjusting what would have been a more recent estimate by assuming that the mutation rate slowed over
time in ape
evolution.
With the honeyguides» help, the Hadza found hives
about 58 % of the
time, more than twice as often as when foraging alone, researchers report in a paper in press at
Evolution and Human Behavior.
The researchers, led by Penn State political scientist Eric Plutzer, questioned nearly 1,000 teachers
about their personal beliefs and the amount of class
time they devoted to
evolution and creationism.
On evolutionary
time scales, we know far less
about the effects of extinction of rare species, but we do know that
evolution can amplify the effect of a species over
time through its interactions on survival of other species.
«During the
evolution of a star
about to go supernova, the outer part of the star expands out to
about 100
times the radius of the sun, and the inner part that's going to make the pulsar shrinks to less than 1,000 miles across,» Phinney says.
At the
time, little was known
about human
evolution, and Boule's findings made headlines worldwide.
«Collecting real -
time data for material microstructural
evolution during radiation exposure: Researchers have improved a versatile spectroscopy method to enable continuous monitoring of the properties of materials exposed to radiation — which could provide real -
time information
about a material's microstructural
evolution.»
The finding supports one of Charles Darwin's notions
about evolution: If an organ isn't crucial, variations in its structure or performance aren't lost over
time, keeping the potpourri in the population.
Roberto Cazzolla Gatti, who began to be interested in the role of cooperation in
evolution since 2011, when he published a controversial paper titled «Evolution is a cooperative process: the biodiversity - related niches differentiation theory (BNDT) can explain» concluded: «These theoretical findings, confirmed by empirical approaches, should motivate our species to think before it is too late about how human competition, for the first time in the history of life on Earth, has been systematically leading to the extinction of animals an
evolution since 2011, when he published a controversial paper titled «
Evolution is a cooperative process: the biodiversity - related niches differentiation theory (BNDT) can explain» concluded: «These theoretical findings, confirmed by empirical approaches, should motivate our species to think before it is too late about how human competition, for the first time in the history of life on Earth, has been systematically leading to the extinction of animals an
Evolution is a cooperative process: the biodiversity - related niches differentiation theory (BNDT) can explain» concluded: «These theoretical findings, confirmed by empirical approaches, should motivate our species to think before it is too late
about how human competition, for the first
time in the history of life on Earth, has been systematically leading to the extinction of animals and plants.
The account of the players and theories in the field of human
evolution does highlight how much of the debate involves mere name games, with lumpers and splitters arguing ad nauseam
about the same few specimens widely scattered through space and
time.
A best - seller by former New York
Times science writer Nicholas Wade
about recent human
evolution and its potential effects on human cultures has drawn critical reviews since its spring publication.
The girl's lineage had less
time to accumulate mutations, and the «missing
evolution» suggests she died
about 80,000 years ago, although the date is tentative, says co-author David Reich, a population geneticist at Harvard University.