Sentences with phrase «times by other scientists»

His work has been cited almost 18,000 times by other scientists.

Not exact matches

It comes down to what every scientist knows too well — analyzing data collected by different methods, and at different times, is a tricky business because some methods of collecting ocean surface temperatures are more accurate than others.

@Theo A 2009 poll by Pew Research Center found that «Nearly all scientists (97 %) say humans and other living things have evolved over time».

In 2009, a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found that «Nearly all scientists (97 %) say humans and other living things have evolved over time.»

That's why he and hundreds of other scientists around the world have joined Earthtime, a 10 - year endeavor to nail down the sequence of past events on Earth by refining scientists» techniques for measuring deep time.

Computer scientists from Saarbrücken have now developed a novel approach that turned out to be so promising, that it was adopted by companies in record time — among others by Pixar, well - known in the movie industry for its computer animation, and now a subsidiary of the Walt Disney Company.

The scientists hope that such investments would also cause positive changes of habits: For example, when parking is made more expensive in downtown areas, accompanied by an improvement of public transport, people might tend to give up driving and use other forms of transportation not just once, but for a longer time.

(Previous research by other scientists had shown that ultrasound makes the bubbles resonate thousands of times a millisecond.)

That mirrored other polls showing a growth in climate skepticism over the same time frame, a phenomenon that has been explained by the economic crisis, weather and the «Climategate» scandal, which revealed scientists wrangling in hacked emails (ClimateWire, Dec. 3, 2009).

Although his team continued its research, with other scientists assuming the principal investigator roles he had held, the lab lost critical time on projects funded by grants due for renewal.

For the first time, scientists have shown that MRSA (methicillin - resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and other antibiotic - resistant «superbug» infections can be tracked across Europe by combining whole - genome sequencing with a web - based system.

By comparing our genetic make - up to the genomes of mice, chimps and a menagerie of other species (rats, chickens, dogs, pufferfish, the microscopic worm Caenorhabditis elegans, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and many bacteria), scientists have learned a great deal about how genes evolve over time, and gained insights into human diseases.

By the time the mission is completed, scientists hope to get answers on why Mercury is so dense and understand its geological history, the structure of its iron - rich core and other issues.

«By knowing which microbes take over a dead body and how long it takes, forensic scientists might be able to use this technique to determine time of death or other aspects of a crime scene.»

So it is time for scientists to respect history as a science and for historians to test their historical hypotheses by the comparative method and other techniques.

«The grant will fund setting up infrastructure [for efforts to] connect groups and junior scientists around the country with our group and each other; helping local groups organize meetings and workshops by providing full - time logistical support; and beginning to look through the data that exists about the scientific enterprise [so that] we can... advocate for change,» McDowell tells Science Careers by email.

«For the first time, we have shown that nutrients from ant waste are taken up by the leaves and transported to other places in the tree,» says senior scientist Joachim Offenberg, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, who was in charge of the studies.

Climate scientists, however, are only too aware of the problems (see Climate myths: It was warmer during the Medieval period), and the uncertainties were both highlighted by Mann's original paper and by others at the time it was published.

What the scientists found confirmed their suspicions: Cars in congested traffic spent more time being overtaken by other cars than they did passing them.

Also, as pointed out by Turner earlier this year, an older Universe gives the favoured cold dark matter model time to make the large collections of galaxies seen today, without bringing in any other «fixes», such as the addition of hot dark matter (New Scientist, Science, 16 July).

Eberle and Kim said the early - middle Eocene greenhouse period from 53 to 38 million years ago is used as a deep - time analog by climate scientists for what could happen on Earth if CO2 and other greenhouse gases in Earth's atmosphere continue to rise, and what a «runaway» greenhouse effect potentially could look like.

The reasons for buying a one - way ticket are more than the higher salaries available in the United States, although that is a major consideration, says Kohler, citing 83 interviews she conducted with French scientists who are now or once were in the United States Other advantages to America cited by these researches are better working conditions, fairer recruitment, a competitive spirit, and the ability to devote more time to research and less to teaching.

Scientists trained two rat populations — one with these cells intact and the other with them disabled — to fear a certain sound by giving them a mild shock every time it was played.

Clark's new techniques using capillary electrophoresis and microchip technology may allow for real - time field screening of plutonium and other materials by nuclear proliferation investigators and forensic scientists at the Department of Homeland Security.

«There's a school of thought that the reason enzymes work better in cells than in solution is because the concentration of enzymes surrounded by other biomolecules in cells is about 1,000 to 10,000 time more than in standard biochemistry lab conditions,» said Eric Ackerman, PNNL chief scientist and senior author of a related study that appears today in the journal Nanotechnology.

Now a group led by scientists at the Department of Energy's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Northwestern University has reported a shortcut for discovering and improving metallic glass — and, by extension, other elusive materials — at a fraction of the time and cost.

Thanks to the data provided by citizen scientists, the researchers were able show that the diversity of bird beaks expanded early in the group's evolutionary history, around the time other dinosaurs died out.

A team led by Rice University scientists used a unique combination of techniques to observe, for the first time, a condensed matter phenomenon about which others have only speculated.

I have often read that scientists have argued that your happiness is largely determined by genes and your state of health at a particular time, including several other factors mostly outside of your control.

It may seem like a dream come true to some, but their lives can morph into a living nightmare at any time — like when Angel, the youngest member of the «Flock,» is kidnapped and taken back to the «School» where she and the others were genetically engineered by sinister scientists.

In a series of encounters with art made strange by its expansions, contractions, inversions and implosions in time and space, The Quick and the Dead surveys more than 80 works by a global, multigenerational group of 50 artists, scientists and musicians — among them James Lee Byars, Joseph Beuys, Marcel Duchamp, Harold Edgerton, Ceal Floyer, Felix Gonzalez - Torres, Pierre Huyghe, The Institute for Figuring, Paul Ramirez Jonas, Stephen Kaltenbach, On Kawara, Christine Kozlov, David Lamelas, Louise Lawler, Paul Etienne Lincoln, Mark Manders, Kris Martin, Steve McQueen, Helen Mirra, Catherine Murphy, Bruce Nauman, Rivane Neuenschwander, Claes Oldenburg, Roman Ondák, Adrian Piper, Roman Signer and Shomei Tomatsu, among many others.

His work has been covered by NPR, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, Washington Post, Fast Company, Filmmaker Magazine, New Scientist, BBC, PBS, Discovery Channel, Cool Hunting and WIRED among others.

I hope the time spent on RC — directly, and by attracting and putting forward other scientists to the foreground — is included with everything else Michael Mann does that's being acknowledged by the award.

It would be a far better use of most scientists and PhDs time who comment on this forum and on others like Open Mind to just STOP wasting YOUR time arguing with idiotic «drunken» deniers, and spend their time much more effectively by scouring the internet for such «events» as «Gas Fracking reviews by Government» etc etc in all nations across the world and use your education and skills and knowledge and actually make a positive difference to AGW / CC action by sending them a FORMAL SUBMISSION or offering up YOUR OPINION and EXPERTISE to be considered in their deliberations.

Looks like the only rational comments posted here are those posted by other scientists, while the rest reflects the fully understandable concerns of the lay public who, also understandably, think that science always has a complete answer at the ready, cast in stone, to hold true for the life - time of the universe.

I've been greatly concerned about this for quite some time, as public statements made by other scientists suggested that our work would really get to the bottom of a number of questions.

The news side of The Times has nine sports blogs; nine spanning fashion, lifestyles, health, dining and the like; four business blogs; four technology blogs (five if you include automobiles as a technology); and a potpourri of other great efforts, with four of my favorites being the Learning Network blog, Scientist at Work, the IHT Rendezvous blog on global news and Lens, run by the paper's photo staff.

Here's why I see no social or political tipping point: Behind the ups and downs tracked by Gallup, Pew, The Times and others, there's been little evidence of a shift in what political and socials scientists call «issue salience» for global warming — making it the kind of problem citizens bring to the voting booth.

I have no idea what you are referring to, except perhaps that the rote regurgitation of long - since and many - times - over debunked denialist nonsense is mercifully (and no doubt laboriously) deleted by the RC moderators — unlike every other open blog on the Internet where any attempt to discuss the science of anthropogenic global warming is quickly drowned out by a torrent of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, blatant falsehoods, and hate speech against climate scientists.

Trenberth and several other scientists who are, or have been, in the IPCC told InsideClimate News that because the panel has already established that global warming is real, rapidly occurring and driven by human activity, it is time to focus less on defending this basic science and focus more on what is less understood.

Eventually, the 2 °C limit won out — endorsed by, among others, a council of German scientists advising Angela Merkel, the nation's environment minister at the time.

By the time I read Storms of my Grandchildren by NASA climate scientist Dr James Hansen and Science as a Contact Sport by Stephen Schneider in 2009, I was well aware that there was lots of other voices of journalists, writers, activists, and scientists calling for action on climate change besides Al GorBy the time I read Storms of my Grandchildren by NASA climate scientist Dr James Hansen and Science as a Contact Sport by Stephen Schneider in 2009, I was well aware that there was lots of other voices of journalists, writers, activists, and scientists calling for action on climate change besides Al Gorby NASA climate scientist Dr James Hansen and Science as a Contact Sport by Stephen Schneider in 2009, I was well aware that there was lots of other voices of journalists, writers, activists, and scientists calling for action on climate change besides Al Gorby Stephen Schneider in 2009, I was well aware that there was lots of other voices of journalists, writers, activists, and scientists calling for action on climate change besides Al Gore.

In fact, nearly 3,000 scientists and economists have attended the six conferences we have hosted to date, generating press coverage by the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Washington Post, NBC, CBS, BBC, and virtually every other major media outlet in the world.

So excuse me if I doubt what Dr. Offit, and many other «climate scientists» have to say, but I'm an old man and have been fooled to many times in the past by people who were so sure of their «facts» which turned out be completely wrong.

It's time for the «convinced» to start beefing up their scientific arguments; they are not going to win any arguments by making ad hominem attacks on other scientists.

Using data gathered from tree rings, etc. her and other scientists in the 60's predicted that global warming would resume by 1980 for 2 decades (at the time there had been a cooling trend since a warming peak in the 1930's - and there was scientific consensus of that as all the charts as of the 1980's showed that) followed by 50 years of cooling AND they predicted a spike in cooling around 2020.

But according to the London Times, Dr. Hasnain is «a little - known Indian scientist» whose views that the glaciers might disappear by 2035 are considered «inherently ludicrous» by others in the field.

This dataset, which was an unnecessarily redundant reproduction of several other similar studies, was constructed by a scientist who at the time was a climate change denier.

If a theory is important, and is not refuted over a period of time, the original paper will be referred to (referenced) by other scientists in the same or other learned journals.

I consider the above sections to be full scientific disclosure by Mann and other IPCC scientists of the assumptions and the uncertainities surrounding figures 2.20 and 2.21 based on their knowledge at that time.