Sentences with phrase «title ownership of the land»

Be it, problems with the past deeds, i.e. missing signatures or invalid information or more extreme issues like the detection of fraud relating to the title ownership of land.

Not exact matches

The Director - General, Bureau of Lands and Survey, Mr. Biyi Ismail, said properties of participants under the scheme would be enhanced as they would have authentic title documents to confirm their ownership of such landed properties.

Red River Gradient Boundary Survey Act — Vote Passed (250 - 171, 10 Not Voting) The bill would require the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to pay for a private survey to identify the south boundary line along the Red River separating Texas and Oklahoma with regards to land title and ownership, with the states of Texas and Oklahoma to determine which lands are federal lands and which are privLand Management (BLM) to pay for a private survey to identify the south boundary line along the Red River separating Texas and Oklahoma with regards to land title and ownership, with the states of Texas and Oklahoma to determine which lands are federal lands and which are privland title and ownership, with the states of Texas and Oklahoma to determine which lands are federal lands and which are private.

CONDOMINIUM Ownership in which owner has title to a dwelling unit and owns a share of the common elements - e.g. elevators, hallways and the land.

Real Property: Any land, improvements to land or structures, and physical structures or buildings that someone is entitled to by ownership of a title or deed.

As its title implies, the exhibition addresses the concept of ownership — both literally and figuratively — and the notion of «reclaiming» what belongs to a person and their communities, from their lands and governments to their physical bodies and basic human rights.

As the elected president of the community of Agua Caliente, Tot brought documents showing Q'eqchi ownership of land to the government and petitioned for land titles.

Ransom claims may also stem from defects to the title and to the site itself rather than lack of rights required over lands in third - party ownership.

The meaning of Aboriginal title: Aboriginal title is a beneficial interest in land, with a right to «use it, enjoy it and profit from its economic development» [70] It is a «collective» title, held for present and later generations, [74] that confers ownership rights similar to «fee simple,» including «the right to decide how the land will be used; the right of enjoyment and occupancy of the land; the right to possess the land; the right to the economic benefits of the land; and the right to pro-actively use and manage the land.»

Had the legislature intended to expand the effect of s. 51 to ownership of a statutory tenancy in common, it could have amended the definition of «owner» in the Land Titles Act beyond the owner of the estate in fee simple.

As a qualifier of the word «owner,» clearly «registered owner» means a person whose ownership interest is registered under the Land Titles Act.

• The Ontario Land Titles Act might give a guarantee for a transfer of ownership, a charge or a discharge, even though an authority of an agent to sign it was void for lack of a seal.

The Haida Nation asserts that: Haida Gwaii is Haida lands, including the waters and resources, subject to the rights, sovereignty, ownership, jurisdiction and collective Title of the Haida Nation who will manage Haida Gwaii in accordance with its laws, policies, customs and traditions.

Litigation of title, ownership, boundary, easement, and restrictive covenant disputes; adverse possession claims; challenges to condominium development schemes involving phasing, land withdrawal, and affordable housing issues; and condominium construction defect cases.

Similarly, the courts have developed an approach to understanding the ownership of resources on aboriginal title land that is deeply rooted in equity's approach to separating the «legal» ownership of land from the «beneficial» or «equitable» title to the same resources.

The Real Estate, Condemnation, and Trust Litigation Committee focuses on real estate disputes and their resolution, including issues of ownership, purchase and sale, title, casualty, and land use.

Where the mines and minerals are excepted from the ownership, the owner of the rights to mines and minerals does not necessarily have the right to enter, break or damage the surface of the land, in order to obtain the mines and minerals unless it is clearly stated on the title register of the property.

If you own a property that has not changed hands since 19325 or before, on sale, if you do have sufficient title deeds, showing a chain of ownership to you, on completion, the buyer will have to register the property at the Land Registry.

When an oil company decides it wants to drill on a particular type of land, it uses a landman to perform title searches to determine ownership of the property.

The Delgamuukw case (1997)(also known as Delgamuukw v. British Columbia) concerned the definition, the content and the extent of Aboriginal title (i.e., ownership of traditional lands).

Calder is best known for his role in the Nisga'a Tribal Council's Supreme Court case against the province of British Columbia (commonly known as the Calder case), which demonstrated that Aboriginal title (i.e., ownership) to traditional lands exists in modern Canadian law.

The high level of home and property ownership in Singapore also necessitates a secure land titles registration system.

These rights eliminate the ownership of the person who has legal title to the land.

We offer expertise in conveyancing, easements, restrictive covenants, positive covenants, registration of title to land, proprietary estoppel, settlements and trusts of land (including implied, resulting and constructive trusts and applications under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996), access to neighbouring land, adverse possession, party walls, boundaries, boundary disputes, school sites, options and pre-emptions, overage and development agreements, property - related insolvency, ownership and disposition of land by charities and unincorporated associations, highways, Crown rights, chancel repairs, commons and town and village greens and property - related torts (including trespass and nuisance), stamp duty land tax and VAT on property transactiland, proprietary estoppel, settlements and trusts of land (including implied, resulting and constructive trusts and applications under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996), access to neighbouring land, adverse possession, party walls, boundaries, boundary disputes, school sites, options and pre-emptions, overage and development agreements, property - related insolvency, ownership and disposition of land by charities and unincorporated associations, highways, Crown rights, chancel repairs, commons and town and village greens and property - related torts (including trespass and nuisance), stamp duty land tax and VAT on property transactiland (including implied, resulting and constructive trusts and applications under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996), access to neighbouring land, adverse possession, party walls, boundaries, boundary disputes, school sites, options and pre-emptions, overage and development agreements, property - related insolvency, ownership and disposition of land by charities and unincorporated associations, highways, Crown rights, chancel repairs, commons and town and village greens and property - related torts (including trespass and nuisance), stamp duty land tax and VAT on property transactiLand and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996), access to neighbouring land, adverse possession, party walls, boundaries, boundary disputes, school sites, options and pre-emptions, overage and development agreements, property - related insolvency, ownership and disposition of land by charities and unincorporated associations, highways, Crown rights, chancel repairs, commons and town and village greens and property - related torts (including trespass and nuisance), stamp duty land tax and VAT on property transactiland, adverse possession, party walls, boundaries, boundary disputes, school sites, options and pre-emptions, overage and development agreements, property - related insolvency, ownership and disposition of land by charities and unincorporated associations, highways, Crown rights, chancel repairs, commons and town and village greens and property - related torts (including trespass and nuisance), stamp duty land tax and VAT on property transactiland by charities and unincorporated associations, highways, Crown rights, chancel repairs, commons and town and village greens and property - related torts (including trespass and nuisance), stamp duty land tax and VAT on property transactiland tax and VAT on property transactions.

Leasehold Title Ownership Reports - determining leasehold title interest on Federal (BLM), State and Fee lands as to Working Interest, Net Revenue Interest, ORRI; confirming current status of HBP / HBU lands within Federal UTitle Ownership Reports - determining leasehold title interest on Federal (BLM), State and Fee lands as to Working Interest, Net Revenue Interest, ORRI; confirming current status of HBP / HBU lands within Federal Utitle interest on Federal (BLM), State and Fee lands as to Working Interest, Net Revenue Interest, ORRI; confirming current status of HBP / HBU lands within Federal Units.

Ownership of land and resources is accommodated by the NTA through recognised or claimed native title rights and interests.

Also, the emphasis in the Principles on preserving inalienable title, but only in such a way as to maximise benefits to individuals and families, potentially threatens communal ownership of land.

Representation in Land Councils and Native Title Representative Bodies is limited to Indigenous groups that can demonstrate traditional ownership of areas covered by the land council or NLand Councils and Native Title Representative Bodies is limited to Indigenous groups that can demonstrate traditional ownership of areas covered by the land council or Nland council or NTRB.

The Land Councils and Native Title Representative Bodies are limited in their scope for representation as they only generally represent Indigenous groups that can demonstrate traditional ownership of areas covered by the land council or NLand Councils and Native Title Representative Bodies are limited in their scope for representation as they only generally represent Indigenous groups that can demonstrate traditional ownership of areas covered by the land council or Nland council or NTRB.

The Committee is concerned, despite positive developments towards recognising the land rights of the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders through judicial decisions (Mabo 1992, Wik 1996) and enactment of the Native Title Act of 1993, as well as actual demarcation of considerable areas of land, that in many areas native title rights and interests remain unresolved and that the Native Title Amendments of 1998 in some respects limits the rights of indigenous persons and communities, in particular in the field of effective participation in all matters affecting land ownership and use, and affects their interests in native title lands, particularly pastoral lTitle Act of 1993, as well as actual demarcation of considerable areas of land, that in many areas native title rights and interests remain unresolved and that the Native Title Amendments of 1998 in some respects limits the rights of indigenous persons and communities, in particular in the field of effective participation in all matters affecting land ownership and use, and affects their interests in native title lands, particularly pastoral ltitle rights and interests remain unresolved and that the Native Title Amendments of 1998 in some respects limits the rights of indigenous persons and communities, in particular in the field of effective participation in all matters affecting land ownership and use, and affects their interests in native title lands, particularly pastoral lTitle Amendments of 1998 in some respects limits the rights of indigenous persons and communities, in particular in the field of effective participation in all matters affecting land ownership and use, and affects their interests in native title lands, particularly pastoral ltitle lands, particularly pastoral lands.

Public discussion began in late 20045 when the CEO of New South Wales Native Title Services and member of the government - appointed Indigenous advisory body, the National Indigenous Council (NIC), 6 Mr Warren Mundine, issued a press release calling for changes to the tenure of Indigenous land to facilitate increased home ownership and business development.7 In February 2005, the federal Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs indicated that the Australian Government would contemplate changes to tenure in reforming the federal land rights legislation operating in the Northern Territory, the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Ctland to facilitate increased home ownership and business development.7 In February 2005, the federal Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs indicated that the Australian Government would contemplate changes to tenure in reforming the federal land rights legislation operating in the Northern Territory, the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Ctland rights legislation operating in the Northern Territory, the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (CtLand Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth) 8

That is, Indigenous ownership of land, houses and infrastructure is not represented by legal titles, deeds and statutes of incorporation that are alienable and able to be used to create capital.

This Report outlined guidelines to enable the transfer of land title from the Aboriginal Lands Trust to Aboriginal ownership.

In Northern Territory the longstanding recognition of traditional ownership as a basis for legally recognised rights and interests in land has contributed to a relationship of trust between the present government and those representing the interests of native title claimants, the Northern Land Council and the Central Land Counland has contributed to a relationship of trust between the present government and those representing the interests of native title claimants, the Northern Land Council and the Central Land CounLand Council and the Central Land CounLand Council.

To the contrary, proposed changes to the permit system and Aboriginal land ownership involve weakening Aboriginal freehold title, as opposed to the freehold title of other property owners, and are racially discriminatory at a fundamental level.

The debate was spearheaded by the statement issued by Warren Mundine in late 2004 that the communal nature of Indigenous land needs to be altered so that the land can be utilised to generate wealth for Indigenous people.19 Mr Mundine, a member of the National Indigenous Council and CEO of NSW Native Title Services Ltd, criticised communal ownership under the NSW land rights legislation saying;

(27) Section 47B thus provides some relief from the otherwise inevitable destruction of Indigenous land ownership and culture as a result of the extinguishment of native title.

[the] progressive resolution of land tenure on remote community - titled land in order to secure government and commercial investment, economic development opportunities and home ownership possibilities in economically sustainable communities.

An effective way of giving Indigenous people more opportunities for economic development is to provide them with improved forms of Indigenous land ownership, particularly in those parts of Australia where Indigenous land is held under inferior forms of title.

Having enforceable native title rights, legal recognition of traditional ownership and productive assets such as land are a necessary but not sufficient basis for economic and social development.

The Right People for Country Project seeks to address uncertainty and conflict that can be produced by the intersection of native title and cultural heritage legislation by creating an agreement - making structure to deal with disputes between Aboriginal peoples over land ownership and cultural heritage.

«While we have differing views within our community on how to improve the variety of special Indigenous land tenures across Australian, we recognise that collective ownership is inherent in Aboriginal custom and we believe in the fundamental importance of securing that underlying land title for future generations.»

Government policies need to be flexible to accommodate different types of land ownership (for instance, communally - held native title land or freehold land granted under a land rights regime) and to support the distinct development aspirations of specific communities.

The Committee is concerned... that the Native Title Amendments of 1998 in some respects limit the rights of indigenous persons and communities, in particular in the field of effective participation in all matters affecting land ownership and use, and affects their interests in native title lands, particularly pastoral lTitle Amendments of 1998 in some respects limit the rights of indigenous persons and communities, in particular in the field of effective participation in all matters affecting land ownership and use, and affects their interests in native title lands, particularly pastoral ltitle lands, particularly pastoral lands.

In short, this report discusses the purpose of land rights and native title legislation; the existing provisions for leasing Indigenous communally owned lands under current legislation; economic factors affecting home ownership and business enterprise; and a human rights analysis of the NIC Principles.It does not advocate a position suffice to note that the full and meaningful participation of Indigenous peoples affected by any policy shift, is critical if sustainable outcomes are to be realised.

Under such a doctrine, Aboriginal rights may even survive a grant to non-Indigenous interests of a fee simple title as they are not tied exclusively to land ownership.

The «lease» as a form of land title is being widely advocated as the best means of providing for home ownership and as a means of encouraging economic development on Indigenous land where the underlying title is Indigenous communal ownership.

A freehold title (or fee simple) is generally regarded as the absolute ownership of land, subject only to the laws of the state and powers of the Crown.

Such laws or acts may be of three kinds: (i) laws or acts which simply extinguish native title; (ii) laws or acts which create rights in third parties in respect of a parcel of land subject to native title; and (iii) laws or acts by which the Crown acquires full beneficial ownership of land previously subject to native title.

As international experience in the United States and New Zealand demonstrate, the path to economic development or increased private home ownership is not necessarily realised through the individual titling of communally owned lands.