Sentences with phrase «titled decision rules»

Financial planner Jonathan Guyton and software developer William Klinger proposed a somewhat similar, although far more complicated, system in a research study titled Decision Rules and Maximum Initial Withdrawal Rates.

Not exact matches

The For the Record (Scorecard) item about Paula Creamer challenging the LPGA over a ruling on Annika Sorenstam's drop during last month's ADT Championship was contrasted nicely by the mention in the Sportsmanship Edition of Faces in the Crowd of Halsey Copp's decision to assess himself a one - stroke penalty that may have cost his high school team the state title.

The decision of Richard Kilty, who was disqualified in Sheffield, to rule himself out of contention for the chance to defend his title gave selectors one less dilemma.

Meanwhile, the 2006 decision by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) to lift the «50 percent rule» of the Higher Education Act of 1992, thereby allowing institutions offering more than half of all classes through distance education to distribute Title IV student aid, has permitted online only postsecondary institutions to proliferate.

• Commitment to federal laws established by Supreme Court rulings: OCR's current reading of its authority under Title IX goes beyond the narrow interpretation adopted by the Supreme Court in two decisions that addressed the sexual harassment issue, even explicitly rejecting the rulings in guidelines issued under the Clinton administration.

Two years ago, I wrote a post titled, In Litigation and Legal Research, Judge Analytics is the New Black, in which I discussed three products — Lex Machina, Ravel Law and ALM Judicial Perspectives — that were extracting data from court dockets and applying analytics to reveal insights about judges, such as how they might rule on a specific type of motion or how long they might take to issue a decision.

In» «Adverse Impact Lite» Theory Available Under the ADEA, «Fox opines on the ruling's effect on the ADEA, Title VII, the RFOA clause, and the Supreme Court's 1991 decision in Ward Cove, before he adds:

As you may recall, in a 5 - 4 decision back in 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that Ledbetter's claim against her employer for paying her less than her male counterparts because of her gender was time barred because her present lower pay arose out of salary decisions made years earlier, well outside of the 180 - day statute of limitations for discriminatory employment practices under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

Within hours of the Tsilhqot» in Nation decision the Tahltan First Nation announced it planned to launch an Aboriginal rights and title claim (Emma Crawford Hampel and Nelson Bennett «First Nations armed with Supreme Court ruling put mines in their sights» June 27, 2014, The First Perspective).

Under Art 68 ECT, jurisdiction to request a preliminary ruling on Title IV or acts adopted under that title is confined to national courts against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under nationalTitle IV or acts adopted under that title is confined to national courts against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under nationaltitle is confined to national courts against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law.

In her study, Ravina Bains, associate director of the Fraser Institute Centre for Aboriginal Policy Studies, looked at the October 2015 Supreme Court decision upholding a British Columbia Court of Appeal ruling that would allow First Nations to file for damages against private entities without proving aboriginal title first.

While we will be featuring posts over the coming days on this award that dissect and analyze the award, its international legal significance, and its larger geopolitical consequences for all claimants to the South China Sea dispute and third - party actors (such as the United States), for now, a close read of all 479 pages of this arbitral award reveals it to be an extremely rich and fertile piece of international jurisprudence, one that will certainly have far - ranging doctrinal impacts as an international judicial decision that is also an authoritative subsidiary means for determination of the international law rules under UNCLOS, especially on questions such as the: 1) normative weight of «historic rights» and differentiating the same from «historic title» and «historic rights short of sovereignty», and clarifying what could still possibly amount to historic rights that States could still validly assert within the UNCLOS treaty regime;

Those who litigate in federal court may need to think and argue about «Rule 11 sanctions,» but I wager that most will find it easier to refer to the Supreme Court's 1991 decision published at 499 U.S. 340 using its name or style or title or caption and will be able to remember that name long after forgetting the case cite.

Wheeler has largely steered clear of Title II reclassification, suggesting that he can use language from this year's court decision to justify it under rules on promoting broadband competition.

«Title II equals common carrier status, which is the key to the original decision and the proceedings that fell from it — such as the new privacy rules, which were passed, and the proposed set - top box rules, which were pulled off the agenda after Trump won in November,» Blum told the E-Commerce Times.

In the Yorta Yorta decision, the High Court specified requirements for native title to be recognised: what characteristics the relevant claimant group must have, their connection to land, and the continuity of their observance of culture.120 The Court's ruling affixed much of the potential for native title to the time of British imposition of sovereignty, hundreds of years ago.

This aspect was not subsequently addressed in the High Court's ruling in the Wik case, and the first instance decision on mineral rights has since been judicially doubted because of subsequent High Court rulings about government «ownership» of resources: Justice North in the (minority of) the full Federal Court appeal decision in Ward - v - Western Australia observed of the Federal Court decision in Wik that «the conclusion that the mining legislation in Queensland conferred full beneficial ownership on the crown sufficient to extinguish native title can not be regarded as correct» (2000) 170 ALR 159 at para 843.

However, the decision does not mean the only native title rights that can be recognised in the sea must be co-existing: exclusive aspects of native title sea rights that are compatible with public rights (fishing, navigation or innocent passage) were not ruled out by Croker Island.

There is no specific definition of what is habitable or enclosed space in the Sectional Titles Act, but whatever decision is made by the trustees becomes a precedent for the rest of the scheme and they must be careful in deciding what the ruling will be, said Bauer.

THough you could reduce your tax bill if you held title long enough to fit the capital gains tax treatment rules it might not be the best investment decision.

Join us as we explore the ins and outs of the legislative updates, title issues, new rules under the CFPB, issues with foreign buyers and sellers, vesting, contract considerations, closing challenges, recent court decisions, and much more.