Sentences with phrase «titles brought to the courts»

Currently, most claims of aboriginal rights and titles brought to the courts are through a representative action where one member of the group becomes the representative plaintiff for the remainder of the group, making it easier to represent all the members of an entity.

Not exact matches

Mohamed Diame: I was laughed out of court when I suggested Rafael Benitez has the ability to bring titles to St James» Park.

Digging deeper into Vita's library isn't a perfect solution; PS4 still needs more big - ticket games to keep its owners happy and court new buyers, and porting Vita's best games would nullify the few remaining reasons to buy the system, not to mention bringing over third - party titles like Danganronpa would require an external push.

By using standard notice - and - comment rule making, by bringing the agency's policy in line with the Supreme Court's interpretation of Title IX, by getting a better handle on the extent of sexual assault in educational institutions and effective prevention measures, and above all, by focusing regulations on improving the educational opportunities that we provide students rather than upending the sexual mores of society at large, they can demonstrate that not everyone appointed by President Trump need sink to his level.

(d) In the case of an alleged act or practice prohibited by this title which occurs in a State, or political subdivision of a State, which has no State or local law prohibiting such act or practice, a civil action may be brought under subsection (a): Provided, That the court may refer the matter to the Community Relations Service established by title X of this Act for as long as the court believes there is a reasonable possibility of obtaining voluntary compliance, but for not more than sixty days: Provided further, That upon expiration of such sixty - day period, the court may extend such period for an additional period, not to exceed a cumulative total of one hundred and twenty days, if it believes there then exists a reasonable possibility of securing voluntary compliance.

(a) Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that any person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of any of the rights secured by this title, and that the pattern or practice is of such a nature and is intended to deny the full exercise of the rights herein described, the Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate district court of the United States by filing with it a complaint (1) signed by him (or in his absence the Acting Attorney General), (2) setting forth facts pertaining to such pattern or practice, and (3) requesting such preventive relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or other order against the person or persons responsible for such pattern or practice, as he deems necessary to insure the full enjoyment of the rights herein described.

(a) Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that any person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of any of the rights secured by this title, and that the pattern or practice is of such a nature and is intended to deny the full exercise of the rights herein described, the Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate district court of the United States by filing with it a complaint (1) signed by him (or in his absence the Acting Attorney General), (2) setting forth facts pertaining to such pattern or practice, and (3) requesting such relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or other order against the person or persons responsible for such pattern or practice, as he deems necessary to insure the full enjoyment of the rights herein described.

(f) Each United States district court and each United States court of a place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this title.

A judge's recent decision brought an end — for now — to the Authors Guild v. Google court case concerning copyright issues as they pertained to Google's attempts to preserve and provide access to millions of global titles, most of them locked away in far - reaching international and academic libraries.

- Camelot wanted players to «raise» their amiibo in the game - Camelot also wanted some RPG elements to amiibo play, as well as amiibo having a connection to online play - devs didn't want the GamePad to draw the player's attention away from the TV, so they used it for a reverse court view - Nintendo helped bring this feature together - a demo was made in about 3 - 4 months in order to get some feedback - this was Camelot's first HD title - the giant characters (with the Mega Battles) were implemented as some sort of test for HD - the devs wanted the game to be as accessible as possible - that's why Giant Goombas, Jump Shots and Chance Shots can be disabled - Nintendo suggested additions such as the Jump Shots - Mega Battles were Camelot's idea, not Nintendo's - the developers were concerned about how they would work, and what impact they would have on basic actions

Microsoft has lost ground with indie developers to Sony, which has been courting the most prominent small game makers for PS4 and PS Vita, but by by making it easy for indie developers to port their existing Unity games over to Xbox One, Microsoft has just gained some valuable ground in bringing smaller, cheaper and more experimental titles to its new console.

And a 2014 Supreme Court of Canada decision — brought by the current chief Roger William — granted the Xeni Gwet» in title to 1,750 square kilometres of land.

Recorded earlier today, the program, titled Roberts» Rocky Road, brings together a formidable panel of guests to discuss the Roberts nomination and the future of the Supreme Court.

As a result of the Tsilhqot» in Nation decision, we will most likely see many more First Nations bringing forward to the courts claims for declarations of Aboriginal title.

(5) If the court finds that an action brought pursuant to this section was frivolous as provided in article 17 of title 13, C.R.S., the court shall award costs and attorney fees to the defendant in the action.

The plaintiff in error, who was also the plaintiff in the court below, was, with his wife and children, held as slaves by the defendant in the State of Missouri, and he brought this action in the Circuit Court of the United States for that district to assert the title of himself and his family to frecourt below, was, with his wife and children, held as slaves by the defendant in the State of Missouri, and he brought this action in the Circuit Court of the United States for that district to assert the title of himself and his family to freCourt of the United States for that district to assert the title of himself and his family to freedom.

However, you may be brought up short if the other side files a FLA action for dissolution or legal separation, and then asks the family court to exercise jurisdiction over the jointly titled assets acquired before marriage.

The gray area between in rem orders that affect title to land and in personam orders that enforce rights with regards to land is often too murky to discern, as outlined above, which brings us to the next option a court has with regards to matrimonial assets located in a foreign jurisdiction: to defer to the foreign jurisdiction.

During the 2008 - 09 reporting period, 12 determinations of native title were made by the Federal Court, bringing the total number of determinations since the Native Title Act began totitle were made by the Federal Court, bringing the total number of determinations since the Native Title Act began toTitle Act began to 121.

The High Court decision in the Mabo case in 1992 and the Native Title Act brought about a fundamental shift in law and government policy, giving way to the growing recognition of the rights and interests of Aboriginal people to their country.

The issues for the court to consider on appeal was whether the Brokerage was subject to Title VII and also whether the Salesperson could bring a Title VII lawsuit.

Alabama federal court rejected claims brought against an affiliated real estate brokerage and title company, finding that consumers had received the proper disclosure and the disclosure did not have to exactly replicate the language found in the RESPA regulations.

The new law makes the bank, as plaintiff in the foreclosure lawsuit, bring to court documentation that proves up the lender's legal right (including title and ownership) to foreclose on that property.