We all have different circumstances — we drive more or less than average, some of us live
in big houses in the suburbs, others in tiny apartments in the city, etc..
The streets are filled with what seems to be endless blocks of
big houses with close proximity to the beaches and quaint shops.
For example, all ebooks from traditionally published authors
at big houses.
Nowadays, when looking around, there are lots
of big houses on very small sections of land.
A beautiful
big house on acres of land, with a security system fit for a king.
This in turn puts status pressure on the income groups below them, who also
build bigger houses.
We are constantly doing projects (usually just incorporating the kids in
bigger house projects) and we love reading together.
You don't have to «live in a house, a
very big house in the country» to lust after this look.
A place where technology and data actually create a more liquid, vibrant and ultimately
bigger housing market.
Quite frankly that's one of the best ideas I've heard, but unfortunately common sense like that doesn't apply to entities like
big house publishers.
Dream with clients
about big houses — but also support them and their small mortgage.
While I have lived in a
really big house for the past five years, I am ready to sell it and get back to small house living.
There's stories online of authors being published by a
traditional big house publisher who feel their covers didn't represent their book well, but had no say in the matter.
It may be wiser for you to buy a
too big house or condo where you'll be working and rent out a spare bedroom or two.
A
great big house with plenty to do (if you want to) no need to go anywhere.
Keeping up with
bigger house payments could cause you to lose focus on all your other goals — and you may never catch up.
The same services and tools
enjoyed big house publishers, built for the independent publisher.
Easy access to credit makes people more greedy for things like fancy cars and
big houses which can create more debt.
We live in a
pretty big house, and I keep being plagued with thoughts that I just haven't decorated enough or been creative enough.
This conclusion could be challenged by some observers by arguing that most of the cost increase in residential units could be attributed to the desire of households to acquire
ever bigger houses.
The main American project since the end of the second world war has been to build
bigger houses farther apart from each other.
Big houses allow everyone to have their own separate rooms and this creates distances in relationships and barriers in communication.
For
big house owner, there always a problem with Wi - Fi signal strength as somewhere it shows 100 percent connectivity and somewhere it shows slow speeds or no connectivity.
Parents who live
in big houses find these monitors to be useful because they tend to have a larger range of distance than analog baby monitors.
Love seeing what you have done with your Not
So Big house and what a difference the white paint has made in the exterior of your home.
I often see this as a complaint about many things published
by big houses, but I can't ever see it as a negative.
These people, the narrative goes, have enjoyed great advantages the young can only dream of:
big houses with low mortgages; pensions; great healthcare etc..
We lived in a
really big house and moved to a smaller house from there and it seems like for the past three years we've done little but give stuff away.
But the resistance of backbenchers to development on their patches, the ambiguity of the Liberal Democrats (some of whom are pushing More Garden Cities Now), the lateness of part of the Treasury push and the long timetable for building houses conspire against the Chancellor
getting big housing growth in the little - more - than - two - year - period between now and the general election.
Great Danes
need big houses to live in because they will accidentally knock things over very easily, and their owners must have a big vehicle to transport them.