Sentences with phrase «to a carbon tax»

As for carbon taxes, if people are willing to pay them, then they do.

This combines the simplicity and fairness of a revenue - neutral carbon tax with the efficacy of an economy - wide cap.

Natural gas is currently a fairly inexpensive fuel, but that may change in the future with carbon taxes on fossil fuels.

You'll see our estimates of carbon tax revenues by clicking here and clicking the link in the fourth paragraph.

Some energy experts recommend an increase in spending for clean energy research and development, which could be financed from carbon tax revenues.

Oil companies don't care about carbon taxes because they will simply incorporate the costs into what consumers pay.

Since it's easier to model, I've decided to look at carbon taxes at rates of $ 20.

This guidance document provides a conceptual analysis and important practical lessons learned from implementing carbon taxes around the world.

And most carbon tax proposals do not have rates high enough to meet this test... or bear this criticism.

The world's first national carbon tax was just finalized.

A year ago, it said it expected a $ 400 million carbon tax bill and said it was well positioned to meet that cost.

We've met the upfront capital cost of # 55 billion through carbon taxes over 13 years.

We regularly advise our clients on issues including carbon taxes, carbon finance, cap - and - trade regimes, voluntary markets and hard emissions cap legislation.

Do you know who he first shared the idea of a global carbon tax with?

The Conservatives have launched plans for a new carbon tax in an effort to ensure their new focus on the environment does not damage their traditional business links.

Scandinavian carbon tax rates differ by type of fuel, economic sector, and whether or not the emissions concerned also come under cap - and - trade arrangements.

Now just one more thing, how about using some of the income from the much needed carbon tax to finance energy efficient housing at mass transit stops.

Yet he wants everyone to pay carbon taxes so he can sell his carbon capture venture.

Surely it has to be true that using carbon tax revenues to reduce other income taxes is good for the economy, right?

Even without carbon taxes, there are still economic incentives to decrease any form of waste.

Most major oil companies have gone on record preferring carbon taxes over increased regulations.

Let's get serious and put a small and constantly rising carbon tax in place.

If we put higher carbon taxes in place, not only would it encourage conservation, but it would directly discourage «alternative» energy that relies heavily on fossil fuels.

So if it made sense to impose a $ 20 / ton carbon tax with no original tax baseline, surely now it makes even more sense to do it, right?

It would be the first carbon tax in the nation and would also make useful investments in forest health, water / drought mitigation, and complementary carbon reduction projects.

But where the revenue goes could be a deal breaker for skeptical politicians engaging the issue — it's a critical pillar in the architecture of any cap and trade or carbon tax system.

The measure includes border tax adjustments to protect energy - intensive domestic industry from unfair competition from nations that haven't enacted carbon taxes.

Despite these benefits, some oppose carbon taxes on the grounds that they disproportionately hurt poor and middle - class households.

Under proposed revenue - neutral carbon tax legislation, about two - thirds of taxpayers are projected to receive more in refunds than they pay in higher energy prices.

Various provinces have also adopted carbon taxes and cap - and - trade systems.

The proposed emissions trading scheme will be more complicated, slower to produce the desired effect, and less effective than a simple carbon tax.

I think carbon taxes are a good idea (although if introduced here, duty on motor fuels should be cut so that the total tax take on motor fuel remains the same).

Instead, its authors believe that developing technology is the way to go, funded by low carbon taxes whose revenues are to be used for clean - energy development.

I have argued for a well - designed carbon tax for more than a decade.

If we want to cut emissions 80 % through taxes, politicians will have to keep raising carbon taxes ever higher for half a century.

You've proposed a modest carbon tax, but how would even that happen?

Why would you favor carbon taxes over cap and trade?