If you're involved in a dispute
over deprivation of liberty, it's important to get specialist legal advice as this is a complex, evolving area of law.
In addition to legislation we think that independent advocacy, joined up services and a culture of supportive enablement instead
of deprivation of liberty at crisis points would be needed.
The health committee's report, which was assessing the operation of the Mental Health Act 2007, said there was also «profoundly depressing» evidence for the poor operations of the «
deprivation of liberty safeguards» (DOLS) used to protect patients who lack mental capacity.
Annabel Kay (pictured) and Sue Allen, who work for leading law firm Higgs & Sons, believe the ruling in Staffordshire CC v K (Court of Protection 24.5.16), which found that a care regime had created a «
deprivation of liberty under Article 5 of the Human Rights Act» should offer a word of caution to those acting as financial deputies or attorneys for individuals unable to make their own decisions.
If detention is not the same
as deprivation of liberty, and if one might exist without the other, it is conceivable that an incapable patient would be found to be labouring under the former but not the latter, and that he would therefore fall outside the DoLS even though he fell firmly within the Strasbourg judgment in Bournewood.
No party argued that the local authority could give consent to T's
deprivation of liberty at the Unit and there was no dispute between the parties that, in the event that the care plan was approved and the care order was made, a declaration authorising the deprivation of T's liberty would be required.
The United Nations defines violence against women as «any act of gender - based violence that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or mental harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or
arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private life.»
We have invested in producing new cost - effective ways of working which will help you
identify deprivations of liberty expeditiously and process the necessary paperwork.
There was also the matter of Art 5 (right to liberty) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) which
permits deprivation of liberty only in the face of a lawfully made order of a court.
The rhetoric of the American Declaration of Independence may speak of «rights» to life and liberty as inalienable, but the enjoyment of such rights within society was and is conditional;
otherwise deprivation of liberty by penal incarceration would be inconceivable.
Mr Justice Mitting indicated that if after three months the government can not make progress in its negotiations with the Jordanian government he would «very likely... consider that a
continued deprivation of liberty is no longer justified».
The Supreme Court agreed the impugned provisions violated lawyers» Charter rights to be protected from unlawful search and seizure and the
undue deprivation of their liberty.
Since there had been no derogation from Art 5, and since it was common ground that the case did not fall within the categories of
permissible deprivations of liberty listed under Art 5 (1), it followed that if the effect of the control orders was to deprive the individuals of their liberty, the control orders inconsistent with Art 5.
With young persons, practitioners should not rely upon consent from a person with parental responsibility to override a refusal from a capacitated (or Gillick competent when
considering deprivation of liberty) young person.
In addition, Russell has expertise in professional and clinical negligence and injury claims and acts for local authorities and healthcare trusts in consent and treatment cases including «best interests» applications,
deprivation of liberty applications and under the Court's inherent jurisdiction.
A false arrest may be actionable in law, especially where there is a
real deprivation of liberty or other consequences flowing from it, such as loss of employment, impact on the custody of your kids, or public humiliation.
The 2014 Cheshire West case widened the definition of who was subject to «
deprivation of liberty safeguards», putting local authorities under increased pressure and adversely affecting vulnerable people.
This post concerns the extent of any obligations imposed on the UK to investigate violations of non-refoulement (under Article 3, ECHR) and
arbitrary deprivation of liberty (Article 5, ECHR).
In other news, a senior judge in the Court of Protection challenged the government to provide legal representation for vulnerable people in cases
concerning deprivations of liberty and Lord Bach acknowledged that Labour had helped to erode the consensus about the need for legal aid and access to justice.
The provision on which Roe relied —
no deprivation of liberty «without due process of law» — seems inapplicable to a law that has been enacted by a valid legislative process.
In strictly legal terms, he has suffered no more than
deprivation of liberty and freedom of movement for some months.
It speaks of liberty and prohibits
the deprivation of liberty without due process of law.
But likewise I am no lawyer either and am baffled by the epistemology that would underlie the distinction between «
deprivation of liberty» and «liberty of movement».