And since the planet's store of soil carbon is at least twice the quantity locked in the vegetation and the atmosphere, this could in
turn accelerate global warming.
And then the trees grown to absorb carbon would have to be stored deep underground, to prevent the carbon returning to the atmosphere to
accelerate global warming rather than limit it.
If even a portion of that carbon is released through further deforestation, the report warns, the resulting increase in the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere would
significantly accelerate global warming.
Those ten years also continued an extended period
of accelerating global warming, with more national temperature records reported broken than in any previous decade.
Today, more than 1/3 of our nation depends on this fuel source for electricity, meaning when oil and gas companies let it escape into the atmosphere, it not
only accelerates global warming, it also results in massive amounts of wasted resources and diminishes our energy independence.
Would canvassing the vast expanses of land that would be necessary to power even one city with solar collectors unintentionally
accelerate global warming by reflecting heat back into what you guys believe is an atmosphere overburdened with heat collecting CO2?
Geoengineering will not help achieve that long - term target, but the cooling effects of large sulfate clouds are nearly instantaneous, making geoengineering potentially valuable in the event of acute climate crises such as the melting of Arctic sea ice, which could
further accelerate global warming over the decades.
In reality, say its scientists, planned new forests, called «carbon sinks», will swiftly become saturated with carbon and begin returning most of their carbon to the atmosphere,
temporarily accelerating global warming.
People working with Caldeira in the last two years have settled a number of such big and never - before - asked questions − for instance, whether geo - engineering could save the Arctic ice cap (it would not) or whether treating the ocean as a renewable energy source would
actually accelerate global warming (it would).
Three Massachusetts Institute of Technology entities (Global Studies and Languages, Global Borders Research Collaboration, and Anthropology) sponsored his presentation, which answered the burning question: Is
Islmabopbia Accelerating Global Warming?
There is no real debate in the peer - reviewed scientific literature over the fact that the unusual,
accelerating global warming seen since the 19th Century is attributable to the increase of greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide, in the atmosphere due to burning fossil fuels.
Whether you believe that humans are responsible
for accelerating global warming, and I am not personally convinced that we make much difference, or feel that it is a natural cycle that is happening in our solar system, does not make most of the information in this book any less worthwhile.
The loss of large areas of ice on the surface could
accelerate global warming because less of the sun's energy would be reflected away from Earth to begin with (refer back to our discussion of the greenhouse effect).
Since the Arctic is warming faster than the rest of the planet, the release of carbon dioxide from the thawing soils, and also of vast quantities of methane, will almost
certainly accelerate global warming yet further.
A darker — and so more heat - absorbent — Arctic, though, will
surely accelerate global warming and may thus encourage melting of the land - bound Greenland ice sheet.
whereas this process will sequester more CO2 from our atmosphere, this is a very slow process relative to
anthropogenically accelerated global warming and I don't really believe it should be used in the context of this debate.
These positive
feedbacks accelerate global warming and also introduce uncertainty into estimates of climate sensitivity, say Gerard Roe and Marcia Baker of the University of Washington in Seattle.
Formula production and use generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions,
which accelerate global warming and produce pollution and toxic emissions upon disposal.
But several new studies show the biofuel boom is doing exactly the opposite of what its proponents intended: it's
dramatically accelerating global warming, imperiling the planet in the name of saving it.
As the decadal ENSO cycle transitions to a warm phase, the authors expect the opposite to occur,
with accelerated global warming and a «hiatus» in Hadley Cell expansion.