Sentences with phrase «to accept climate science»

But they share one thing in common: that lawmakers should at least accept climate science, regardless of party affiliation.
Or did it ever accept climate science before it began building a powerful narrative against it?
It is more likely because accepting climate science exposes that unacceptable unsustainable activity has developed and needs to be rapidly corrected.
The Australian public accepts climate science and believes the world should act.
But by 2013, Republican moderates like Boehlert who accepted climate science were eliminated.
Small changes push the system past a threshold at which stage a new climate state emerges as tremendous energies cascade through powerful sub-systems — and this is indeed a quite widely accepted climate science paradigm.
Check out the Evangelical Climate Initiative (ECI), which accepts climate science, takes the threat of climate change seriously, and calls on evangelical Christians to address the issue.
Climate change denialism is somewhat understandable in this regard — accepting climate science means coming face - to - face with the realization that one is contributing to serious harms to others, including one's own progeny.
Polls by Pew Research show the vast majority of people (70 — 80 %) in most countries accept climate science and want more to be done to reduce emissions.
«Ninety - seven percent of scientists, including by the way some who originally disputed the data, have now acknowledged the planet is warming and human activity is contributing to it,» Obama said today, citing a recent study that confirmed — once again — that the vast majority of climatologists accept climate science.
In 2011, Romney was chastised by the right - wing media for accepting climate science, even though he didn't propose to do anything about the problem.
[DC: Last time I looked, the political parties accepting climate science and the need for effective action were in the majority in both Canada and the U.S. I suppose those opposed to science will keep «asking questions» and perpetrating falsehoods until they get the answers they like or manage to elect enough obstructionist legislators.
While the general public on average accepts climate science, Republicans are more likely to reject the scientific consensus.
In this case, your «free marketer rejects climate science» link is really your free marketer rejecting what he thinks will flow from accepting climate science: viz, govt (and / or env org) interference.
The new text will say: «To describe those who don't accept climate science or dispute the world is warming from man - made forces, use climate change doubters or those who reject mainstream climate science.
Regarding us (which accept the climate science), then I'm keen on agreeing with dana1981 that we are realists, and maybe that's the right word for it.
«Frankly, as the director of CIA, I would prefer today not to get into the details of climate debate,» he said in response to a question from Harris about whether he accepted climate science.
@ 58 Hank, first the general public (nor I) needs to educate themselves about the intricacies of «statistics» in the links to accept the climate science and act accordingly.
There are quite a few Republicans in Congress that understand and accept climate science, unfortunately they are not being all that vocal about it right now.
The mayor, who said he accepted climate science, found that there was little interest or willingness among people to make this connection and it seems he felt it politic not to push it.
Being fundamentally religious or conservative is not what make a person less likely to accept climate science.
Alan Jones» refusal to accept climate science is one reason he sees no need for renewable energy.
Rather than trying to analyze Trump's well - established refusal to accept climate science, media should be telling stories of how climate change is happening here and now, how it's affecting real people, and how the EPA and other agencies are ripping up climate regulations.
Now the networks are covering climate change but squandering too much of that coverage in trying to read Trump's Fox - addled mind and divine whether he accepts climate science.
For denialists, accepting climate science would mean admitting that unrestrained capitalism is jeopardising our future, that comprehensive government intervention is needed, and that the environment movement was right all along.
By «science informed», we mean that we accept the climate science consensus.
Sanders» announcement was timed to coincide with the high - level negotiations happening right now in Paris, which are expected to result in the first - ever global accord on climate change later this week — but the nuclear portion of his plan is contrary to accepted climate science.
To describe those who don't accept climate science or dispute the world is warming from man - made forces, use climate change doubters or those who reject mainstream climate science.
In the 2012 race, that was Jon Huntsman, who accepted climate science and eschewed homophobia.
But, as POLITICO revealed in a deep - dive published March 7, Pruitt isn't the only member of the Trump administration whose refusal to accept climate science could have serious impacts on U.S. policy.
Senator Edwards will not say whether he accepts climate science.
I asked Anthony Watts, the meteorologist who runs what may be the most popular climate - skeptic blog, Watts Up With That, what could lead him to accept climate science.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z