Sentences with phrase «to accept evolution»

We scientists do not accept Evolution as truth yet.

If you can accept an old earth their should be no reason that you can't accept evolution.

You have been told repeatedly that this is NOT what those who accept evolution think at all, and yet you continue to vomit it up.

Scientists from all walks of life, around the world accept evolution because of the evidence and where it leads.

Your formula is meant to be simplistic and «powerful», but your understanding of really large numbers is what is actually what is holding you back from accepting evolution as being true.

This is not valid, but I will give him that most atheists accept evolution, because they have no reason to dismiss the overwhelming scientific consensus.

To accept evolution wipes out the whole big picture of why we are here and where we are going.

Every one of them fully accepted evolution as a fact.

There are also people who accept evolution, but have no idea how it works.

Scientists of all religious backgrounds can be found that accept evolution because of the facts.

He said that he is expecting objections on these points from some quarters, but feels that these are the full implications for traditional Christian teaching of accepting evolution.

Since an athiest is excluded from the first two options that leaves you from 3 - 11 % you can add to the god evolved group for accepting evolution.

Estrella, The Catholic church officially accepts evolution.

The creationists who confront us are biblical literalists and, contrary to Johnson, there are many people who believe that God creates and who also accept evolution.

Many theists accept evolution as true.

Obviously the Catholic Church compromised with accepting evolution as fact since it is irrefutable.

And even today when we have pretty much accepted evolution as universal, we still, unconsciously perhaps, exclude time from this universal law.

Yes, religious liberals have accepted evolution pretty much from the time Charles Darwin first proposed it, but in contrast to Darwin many of them believe that evolution is purposeful and that nature has a spiritual dimension.

In this book Peter Enns seeks to give Christians, who value Scripture as the Word of God, parameters by which they can understand the Bible and its message while accepting evolution as a valid description of the origin of humans.

I think most non-Cathotic Christians who accept evolution think along those lines as well.

Real scientists who work in the field of immunology accept evolution as a fact.

Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory but a reactionary idea for people who are unable toe accept that evolution is the most rational and reasonable way that life progresses.

Some religions accept evolution as true and assume that god left it to run it course, with some» direction» of course.

Over eighty percent of the population accept evolution.

There is Catholicism, which has formally accepted evolution, and have declared demonstratively impossible Bible passages as allegory rather than literal truth.

Another 38 percent accepted evolution as a process guided by God.

You begrudgingly accept evolution (about a century after Darwin proved it and after accepting Genesis as literally true for about 2,000 years) and that Adam and Eve was totally made up, but then conveniently ignore that fact that your justification for Jesus dying on the cross (to save us from Original Sin) has therefore been eviscerated.

All the Europeans I know that are religious completely accept evolution, vaccines, etc..

It's as if people are saying «ok, ok, let's say there is evolution and there are other scientific theories, but let's insist that something we don't really know and can't prove but totally believe in is behind it all, because otherwise we can't possibly accept evolution and other scientific theories.»

A timeline describes the declension from the biblicism of Martin Luther and John Calvin to the thought of Descartes, Francis Bacon, Galileo, Darwin and Charles Hodge (he may be an archconservative to most Presbyterians, but his acceptance of Darwinism lands him in the hall of shame here) to a certain Charles Templeton, who once traveled with Billy Graham but unfortunately accepted evolution and ended up writing the atheist tract Farewell to God.

The exploratory research, published in the scientific journal CBE — Life Sciences Education, looked at how instructors perceived their role in helping students accept evolution.

If you define accepting evolution as rejecting a belief in God, then that may not be an appropriate goal,» said Elizabeth Barnes, co-author of the study and a graduate student in Brownell's lab.