When people inevitably don't conform, they're often unfairly accused
of being sinners — condemned to hell.
As were the sinners, except he carries his to the final judgement hoping his «works» save him - which is a way of saying «I'm my own savior».
The position of some christians that
gays are sinners and wrong for being what they are is fine for those christians to hold.
Parents who do not themselves take this responsibility with their own children
are sinners against society.
This would insure that «sinners»
really are sinners, and not just mistaken, victims of a charismatic preacher, or born into the wrong church.
Rather, for the most part, there are no saints,
there are no sinners, there are no victims, and there are no villains.
I get the feeling that some of our more vocal Christians here wouldn't be very happy with God if they ended up in a heaven that they had to share with people they just
KNEW were sinners in life.
And now we meet Paul's question: If we are all involved in the sin of humankind and even saints
are sinners too, if godly perfection does indeed totally escape us, and if our only hope lies in the sheer unmerited grace of God, then isn't the whole Christian view of human existence reducible to some pathetic farce?
Thus, even though all men
are sinners before God, sin is not a universal characteristic of the existence of man or of human nature such as corporeality, nor is it some magical or mysterious quality of the sinner.
Observer — We are all hypocrites including Christians who as the bible
says are sinners and God could have perfectly not given Jesus to save anyone of us.
From the Christian perspective, believing that someone
is a sinner does not entail viewing him or her as inferior, and therefore Cochran's statements are not an indication that he has or will discriminate.
The number one dangerous prayer
is the sinners prayer or when a sinner repents because the moment he / she does the real battles begin!
Any man who claims to speak for Jesus and then makes a profit off of
Jesus is a sinner of the most foul proportions; he is destined to spend eternity in the firey pits he has assigned others to via his faux - christian propaganda.
We can not escape
being a sinner on our own, any more than we can become Superman by wearing tights and a cape.
Yes,
Christians are sinner too, but the idea that we should accept any sin as long as it's not illegal or harming someone is 100 % unbiblical.
(Yet we'll talk a lot
about being Sinners and needing Justification, like a debt - forgiveness transaction).
So if you tell a group of people you
think are sinners to go burn in hell, you are saying the same thing to Jesus, because he hangs out with sinners.
But since God does not show mercy to himself, it would not be possible for him to exist without there
also being sinners in need of his mercy — and that notion is absurd.
Are we then necessarily to conclude that since
homosexuals are sinners — and healthy heterosexuals are less so — that Christ died for homosexuals but not for us?
Your
saint is a sinner, get over your fine idea that Rush is any kind of a saint, after all how many women has he divorced to date.
God loved human beings; God hated sin;
everybody is a sinner; God would send all sinners to hell if Jesus hadn't died in our place; believe it or you'll be sorry.
I think Paul's point is to make it clear that all from Adam to pre
law are sinners.