Many agree that his research on ice caps across the world was some of the first, most convincing evidence that current climate
change is due to human activity.
His view that the evidence on climate change is insufficient to include that the observed increase in
temperature is due to human activity therefore seems like one that should be taken seriously.
The authors look closely at the claim of a «scientific consensus» that most of the climate change that occurred in the past 50
years was due to human activity and that future climate change will be dangerous.
Using special analytical methods, researchers from the Niels Bohr Institute, among others, have determined how much methane originates from natural sources and how
much is due to human activity.
Nurtured by environmental hysteria and the determination to show all changes in the natural
world are due to human activity, the claim CFCs were destroying ozone jumped directly from an unproven hypothesis to a scientific fact.
Yet despite all the complexities, a firm and ever - growing body of evidence points to a clear picture: the world is warming, this
warming is due to human activity increasing levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and if emissions continue unabated the warming will too, with increasingly serious consequences.
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2500 of the world's leading climatologists from 70 countries Released report on changes in global climate: Global surface temp have increased by 0.6 C during 20th century Snow & ice extent have decreased Average global sea level has risen Greenhouse gas increase is due to human activity
Michaels, in his customary style, put up a custom - made, non-peer-reviewed data graph that purported to show that the IPCC concluded incorrectly that most of the observed global warming during the past 50
years is due to human activity.
This is another situation where we do not know how much of the environmental
change is due to human activities and how much to long - term natural processes over which we have no control.
3) fake experts — You mean like reporting that the AR4 was created / reviewed by more than 2500 experts, but later we find out only 62 reviewers commented on the key critical chapter in which the near certainty of
GW being due to human activity is asserted.
Contrary to the book's premise, multiple studies and surveys have shown that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree that climate warming trends over the past
century are due to human activities (NASA for example).
Yes, the earth has warmed in the last one hundred years and there is evidence that some or all of it may
be due to human activities.
Farmers who said they trusted environmental groups for information about climate change were more likely to believe that climate change was occurring and that
it was due to human activity.