Sentences with phrase «to be good in the air»

When teams sit deep, we need that striker who is good in the air.

So to say that height has nothing to do with being good in the air is quite a silly statement.

The man is young - powerful plays a very undeniable roll especially when beating defenders, holding up the ball and he certainly is good in the air.

My point is there is a huge difference between height and actually being good in the air.

Coquelin was still great today, and we already know Koscielny is good in the air, Kane was just better today and Kos was weak on that challenge.

and Senderos is good in the air?

Giroud is good in the air and can hold the ball up, Podolski has a bit more pace and if a chance comes his way, you can bet he'll put it in the net.

However it frustrates me that we are basically saying «this guy is good in the air and reads the game well but he's slow as sh*te and my nan could skin him one on one with a simple drop of the shoulder, so cc you need to protect and cover for him» ludicrous it's like playing with 10.5 men on the pitch.

Giroiud is good in air but he lacks aggressiveness for goals, welbeck is not consistent as he is always hit with injuries.

Bundesliga is a better league than Ligue 1, Chicharito is better in the air and arguably just as clinical.

First, Debuchy is better in the air than Bellerin, as well as he is physically stronger on the ground.

Certainly not conceding silly goals against Swansea or at Spuds due to not preventing the service to strikers who are good in the air on counter attacks, and we certainly DO need the ability to score goals against teams who set up camp on the edge of their own penalty areas against us knowing we will pour forward and they can hit us on the break.

Carol statistically is the best in the air across the whole of Europe.

There were nervy moments when Iceland played the ball into Mexico's area at every opportunity, but El Tri did relatively well in reducing that aerial threat, given they are a side not known for being good in the air.

We corrected some defensive problems from that game, notably Djourou being better in the air and in manmarking and the Nasri protecting Clichy.

From this you can see we need someone who is good in the air and agressive, but sensible unlike flamini who dives in.

With all of those only koscielny is good in the air.

Gilik is a strong, tall centre back who is good in the air.

He's good in the air, willing to throw himself in front of a shot and just overall better at defending than at being a striker.

On top of the athletic ability, he works his socks off - closing defenders down constantly, he's now a great dribbler, he's good in the air, and he has great predatory instincts.

This dutch guy IS a proven goalscorer yes he IS good in the air he does have a physical presence yes he is good in his current league, BUUUUT, the league he plays in is a league far below the standard of the PL and as was proven with Giroud (who in my opinion is NOT up to this standard) the transition is an unqualified thing, when you bring in a player from a league that is of a lower standard more often than not the player fails.

He is the best in the air and would be perfect fit for teams like Stoke city, West Ham, etal.

«He has a good engine, good stature, he is good in the air and has a good balance in his game, he has a good short ball and a good long ball.

Wenger said about Carroll after the game: «First of all because he is good in the air.

«He's good in the air as well, so overall I believe he has all the attributes to adapt to English football «The game here is very demanding physically on the commitment front and he has the ingredients to adapt to that.

Koulibaly is good and strong with passe but is he any good in the air our problems were headers who remembers the west ham game

Liverpool have been the best in the air, winning a total of 647 aerial duels, while they've also won more tackles (703).

He is good in the air, can use his left and right foot and has decent pace and knowledge of the game,» he said.

Mr. Jenas to be flank, welbeck is more natural striker than OG, he is good in air and his foot work is better than OG, plus speed.

Conte likes his defenders to be good in the air and be able to bring the ball out of defence.

Like what @dave said, Arsenal needs an upgrade to Giroud, a striker that is good in the air, quick, willing to take on the opponent's defenders, has good dribbling and can score more than twenty league goals in a season.

«He is good in the air, he has a good touch, he can beat people and he has clearly got a bit of intelligence.

Hey Big Gun — I am the «someone» who, to paraphrase you, said «that height has nothing to do with being able to be good in the air».

I was told the other day by someone on this forum that height has nothing to do with being able to be good in the air.

He said, «[Xhaka brings] his passing ability to play through the lines from deep positions, his work rate, and he's good in the air.

let walcott giroud and per go bring lukaku because he can dribble and run past defenders bring a defender who is good in air and is no nonsense kind bring a winger who just run headless chicken

He's pacy, he can dripple, he's got great ball control, an incredible goals to minutes ratio, he's good in the air and he can hold the ball up.

I agree that you don't have to be tall to be good in the air.

He's good in the air as well, so overall I believe he has all the attributes to adapt to English football

Boy do we have two contrasting strikers > One's good in the air, the other's not > One has pace, the other doesn't > One's good at hold - up play, the other's not > One has a hairstyle, the other's got no hair... If only we could get the full potential out of both, we could play them both.

He gets in front of forwards» before» they get in front of him and he's better in the air than Per...

debuchy can also play cb he is the best in the air statistically at arsenal he is good in the tackle and at reading games if anyone going to loose out its chambers.but at his age a loan won't do him any harm.

The defender made numerous vital interceptions, made strong tackles, was good in the air and maintained high levels of concentration throughout the 120 minutes of the game.

Morata is someone who is good in the air, but he has not got that nasty character and streak that Costa has got.»

Our ridiculous manager should realise Monreal although doing a fair job is not Sagna, who is good in the air and quick on the ground, so this experiment must stop > Monreal has basically admitted that he is uncomfortable in that position, so why force this position on a player who has stated he is uncomfortable there, when we have a healthy chambers who has already have several games in that position and looks even more comfortable than at right back.