It would
discriminate against students on the basis of their socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity, family history and certainly prohibits most special education students from attending.
Not to mention legal mandates — which you'll note I purposefully didn't even broach until now — which, of course, require that public charters not
discriminate against students with disabilities.
Not to mention legal mandates - which you'll note I purposefully didn't even broach until now - which, of course, require that public charters
not discriminate against students with disabilities.
In state after state, district after district, charter schools
discriminate against students who require special education services, students who need help learning the English language and students who have disciplinary issues.
If real public
schools discriminated against students based on their ethnicity, language skills or special education needs, the Courant and every other respectable media outlet, as well as every education and community advocacy organization would be calling for investigations and prosecutions.
According to the Department's website, anti-poverty legislation and the civil rights movement of the 1960s and 1970s brought about the emergence of the Department's equal access mission.10 This mission includes ensuring that publicly funded schools are not
discriminating against students by race, sex or disability.
The office investigates also whether schools» student discipline
policies discriminate against students of color, and if schools are adhering to Title IX guidance barring discrimination against transgender students.
The idea, in short, is that the same principle that suggests Christian students should be allowed to form groups with particular identities also means that Vanderbilt has a right to corporately
discriminate against student groups at odds with its values
Washington — The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a federal law that prohibits high schools from
discriminating against student religious groups violates the First Amendment's ban on state establishment of religion.
In January 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Education (ED) jointly released a «Dear Colleague Letter» containing guidance on how schools should
avoid discriminating against students on the basis of race when administering disciplinary action.
Ball also reported that officials with the N.C. School Boards Association have identified private schools across the state that
openly discriminate against students and families despite receiving public funding, putting gay parents in the position of having their tax dollars paying for schools that have a policy of refusing admission to their children.
The Dear Colleague guidance letter on civil rights and discipline, prepared in conjunction with DOJ, describes how schools can meet their legal obligations under federal law to administer student discipline
without discriminating against students on the basis of race, color or national origin;
Washington's justification for
discriminating against students like Michael, Rachael and Skyler is a pair of state constitutional provisions with dubious origins: «All schools maintained or supported wholly or in part by the public funds shall be forever free from sectarian control or influence.»
Like all standardized tests, the Common Core
SBAC discriminates against students who come from poor households, students who are not fluent in the English language and students who have special education needs.
[23] Despite the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that states may not
discriminate against students enrolling in K - 12 public schools on the basis of their legal status, clear guidelines do not exist for higher education.
At a meeting held at the Department of Education (ED) in Washington today, conservative groups, parents and some teachers asked the Department to rescind federal guidance issued under the Obama administration, ensuring that school districts aren't
discriminating against students through their discipline policies and practice.
Registration — refusing to accredit professional programs, in the public interest: Courts in three provinces have moved forward to address the power of law societies to refuse to accredit a Christian law school, based on a public interest concern about the school requiring students to sign a covenant abstaining from sexual intimacy outside of marriage between one man and one woman — a covenant that would
effectively discriminate against students of certain sexual orientations.
According to the guidelines schools still «violate Federal law when they evenhandedly [emphasis added] implement facially neutral policies» that were adopted with no intent to discriminate «but nonetheless have an unjustified effect
of discriminating against students on the basis of race.»
Later, when testifying before the House Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies in defense of the budget proposal, Secretary DeVos declined to say whether the Department of Education would intervene if schools receiving federal
funding discriminated against students.
When charters claim to out - perform public schools they are not making those claims from an even playing field and are
discriminating against students who require alternative evaluation methods or who have difficulty taking standardized tests.
Charter schools in Massachusetts have always been prohibited — as a matter of state and federal law —
from discriminating against students with special needs or English language learners.
Acted for a BC school board in a human rights matter brought by parents of a dyslexic child who alleged that the school district had
discriminated against the student by failing to provide adequate accommodations
At her confirmation hearing, DeVos refused to say whether she would deny federal funds to private schools that
discriminate against students based on sexuality, race or special needs.