(Note, of course, that correlation does not necessarily
equal causation here, and higher fertility might also predict greater religiosity.)
Correlation does
not equal causation, as they say, and there are a number of factors that can drive higher average unit volumes, such as having a drive - through, a broader menu, and more marketing spending, but the numbers above do seem to favor the fresh - beef chains.
Corellation does not
necessarily equal causation, perhaps it is because the same correlation exists between average education and crime (the lower the education level, the higher the crime rate).
You are such a bozo you can't figure out that correlation does not
equal causation.
colin: «Did you not read where I said; «however correlation does not
equal causation and I do not venture so far as to say religion causes corruption.»
Did you not read where I said; «however correlation does not
equal causation and I do not venture so far as to say religion causes corruption.»
It may simply correlate to your god's plan, but correlation does not
equal causation.
Correlation does not
equal causation.
Nor do I want to argue about whether being fat is correlated with an increased risk of certain health issues (it is, but as anyone with a high - school level understanding of statistics can tell you, correlation does not
equal causation, and risk is no guarantee of outcome — otherwise we'd all be at the casino getting rich).
Point being, correlation does not
equal causation.
She doles out advice based on what worked for her or her friend or her cousin without realizing that correlation doesn't
equal causation.
Now, I can already hear the cries of «correlation doesn't
equal causation,» but wouldn't it be fucking awesome if this were true?
But correlation does not
equal causation.
Doesn't any marginally competent student know that association does not
equal causation?
Of course correlation does not
equal causation.
Correlation may not
equal causation, but, Pedler says, «everything is pointing toward the reduction in rabbits» as the cause of the rebound.
For the paper, the scientists did not try to pin down exactly how and why this happens, and they stressed that correlation did not
equal causation.
As with all aspects of life, it is important to note that correlation does not
equal causation, but ironically, this is where the myth of the danger of cholesterol originated.
Of course, correlation does not
equal causation, but in this case, the evidence is strong enough to at least warrant caution and further study.
Of course, correlation doesn't
equal causation, but it worth a second look when we have rising rates of heart disease, cancer, obesity and many other health problems.
We've taken an unscientific leap in logic and determined that correlation
equals causation.
While the authors should know better than to make such claims, it's very clear that the science - naive journalists who report on these studies have never learned that association does not
equal causation.
And while correlation does not
equal causation, generally eating nutrient - dense food which does not entail any of the foodstuffs that could potentially harm you, is probably very good common - sense advice your grandmother would give you (and for which scientific training is not required to be viewed as preferable).
Approach each study you read carefully and remember than correlation does not
equal causation!
What is funny is that the Paleo eating pattern due to the high protein content is one that is strongly associated with bodybuilding, powerlifting, cross-fit activities, and Paleo - pushers are the very first to start shouting «correlation does not
equal causation» at the top of their lungs as if they were saying some damning to evidences of the healthfulness of other eating patterns such as plant - based.
Association does not
equal causation.
And my college stats class taught me correlation does not
equal causation.
Some people who embark on a ketogenic diet may end up complaining about low thyroid or sex hormones, but association does not
equal causation!
Of course, this graph alone doesn't prove anything (correlation does not
equal causation), but it does make sense that replacing traditional foods like butter and meat with processed low - fat foods high in sugar had something to do with it.
Correlation does not
equal causation.
Correlation doesn't
equal causation, but the test results — with all of their inherent weaknesses — gave a strong indication of how students were faring in our system.
Correlation does not
equal causation; it may be that depression and anxiety lead to more social media use, for example, rather than the other way around.
The fact that small, East Coast provinces do poorest in PISA is another hint in this direction (correlation does not
equal causation, of course...).
My trial run with Facebook ads just happened to coincide with this weekend's surge, and as I mentioned above, it's very important not to assume such correlation
equals causation.
Safety studies are done for a reason and correlation does NOT
equal causation.
Remember: Correlation does not
equal causation.