If I could
find something wrong with me, I did.
Although there are a few that I really like, I always seem to
find something wrong with them (too warm - toned, too light, too dark, too sheer, etc.).
You fall in love with it and wear it out — until
you find something wrong with it — or you've found that it no longer is giving you what you want.
When the check engine light comes on, it means the computer has
found something wrong with something and has stored a trouble code in it's memory to tell you what it found.
Check Engine Light This means the computer has
found something wrong with something and has stored a «trouble code» in it's memory.
Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and
find something wrong with it.»
The QA engineer is indeed trying to
find something wrong with it but that's a good thing, because the code is intended to ultimately work in a much larger context than «just when this one guy uses it».
So he had good reason to fear that someone might
find something wrong with it.
We believe that he has very little confidence in his own data because he agreed he wrote «Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is
find something wrong with it?»
On the other hand, I'm sure we would both agree, if Phil Jones would have answered the question, he would have put his head in his hands and cried for mercy and proclaimed something like this: Sir, I couldn't give Steve the data because he would
find something wrong with it... Just like he did with NASA... and I would have looked like a bozo or a moron, you know, all those names Mike and I liked to call him.
Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and
find something wrong with it,» makes me believe this entire field is no longer acting as a group of PUBLICLY funded researchers in search of the truth.
You will just try to
find something wrong with it.»
«Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and
find something wrong with it» seems to be the modus operandum of the average climate «scientist».
There only purpose in requesting this data is to
find something wrong with it and then demand that nothing be done about global warming.
Why should we let you see the data when your only objective is to
find something wrong with it?
He wants a pre-print, but why would the authors give him one, when all he wants to do is
find something wrong with it?