I see people every day who change their opinions to
fit an argument with no consistency to what they say.
Climate science denialists will often fool people, and sometimes themselves, by cherry - picking the bits of evidence they
think fit their argument.
So either I'm a politico (as I dislike politics and politicians, I doubt it) or at least one person does
n't fit the argument here.
Nuance is the first to go when it comes time to
fit an argument to a page, so apologies if I hurt anyone's feelings or left the impression that I would like to see Finance Committee Chairman Wayne Easter get a seat at meetings of the Governing Council.
While the book has weak points — most notably regarding Isaac Backus, the 18th - century baptist minister and author of the important treatise Government and Liberty Described and Ecclesiastical Tyranny Exposed (1778)-- who appears and then disappears without much clarity on how
he fits the argument — it is generally an incisive interpretation.
Since I was accused of insulting your intelligence and being mean earlier today, I'll assume you do understand that this is the denotation that applies to evolution and gravity; and you're intentionally ignoring it because it doesn't
fit your argument.
Religion does not do this and to suggest the bible has any sort fo science in it is a futile attempt to distort what it says to
fit your argument, somthing you must be getting pretty good at.
You can't change what Atheist means just to make
it fit your argument.
People like to ignore evidence to
fit their arguments, and this extends far beyond evolution / creationism.
You can not age the fetus to
fit your argument.
No - one outside the club knows, and the figures just escalate to
fit the argument.
As Iain Duncan Smith has previously shown, members of this government often seem to believe that facts and statistics should be made to
fit their arguments, rather than the other way around.
It argues that all of these approaches are valid and have different uses, but that policymakers, academics and NGOs ought to be more careful to ensure that they are quoting the appropriate statistic to
fit their arguments.
I have a feeling that you have heard the same and have bent these things to
fit your argument.
(That's why they change the data to
fit the argument).
One can not pick the timeframes to
fit the argument.