Even outside of the Atheist belief system, I have
heard this argument in many of our African American churches.
After
hearing argument on the plaintiff's motion, the trial court ruled that the proposed defendants could not be added and denied the plaintiff's request to conduct additional discovery on the defendants.
I'd say a for sale sign is even less than 5 % yet I've never
heard an argument for not putting one on the lawn.
Lawmakers also
heard arguments about a bill that would ban the sale of puppies coming from so - called puppy mills.
The arbitrator will act similarly to a judge and will decide the case
after hearing arguments and receiving evidence from both parties.
Can the
judge hear arguments that a child staying with the parent is not in the child's best interests?
I have been of course going by what is being said in the mainstream media, and had
n't heard any arguments against this fact.
Still, I bring all this up because we
often hear arguments against smart environmental policies that don't stand up to scrutiny.
I had never quite
heard this argument made this way before — that high law school tuition results in less justice for public service law jobs.
It was a good post, but I felt I needed to take the other side of the argument, because I have
heard this argument too much recently.
You might
hear arguments along those lines — that these regulations will make it more difficult for mom and pop advisors to compete with big banks and may force some to close their doors.
(1) An often -
heard argument in support of global warming in the decades to come is that many different models (roughly) predict this.
And the stronger the politics, the more people on both sides of the aisle grow resistant to
hearing arguments from the other side.
He'd
heard arguments for natural climate cycles and volcanic activity, and they seemed equally plausible.
We've
also heard the arguments that there is no evidence that alternative business structures increase access to justice.
[T] he Missouri Supreme
Court heard arguments on whether that state's 2005 cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases violates the state constitution.
Last month, the state 2nd District Court of
Appeal heard arguments in Vergara v. California, the lawsuit challenging the state's teacher employment rules.
One big challenge to U.S. efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions comes this week, as a federal circuit court
hears arguments over a challenge to the White House's major climate change initiative, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) regulations targeting emissions from power plants.
As the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is busy girding itself for a fight over new greenhouse gas emissions rules, the U.S. Supreme Court
heard arguments today in a case on whether lawsuits over climate ought to be permitted.
A couple weeks back, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit heard arguments stemming from a 2006 decision by U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler that U.S. tobacco companies were liable for defrauding the public about the dangers and addictiveness of smoking, and ordered them to pay for «corrective» advertising.
The day after the U.S. Supreme Court
justices heard arguments for and against compulsory union fees for nonmembers, three teachers gathered downtown to discuss the next big case that could potentially hammer teachers» unions: Yohn v. California Teachers Association.
It's true that change could come from Washington: Trump could make good on his promise of $ 20 billion for school choice, or after
hearing arguments last week in Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley, the Supreme Court could pave the way for more choice programs by ruling that Blaine Amendments, which prohibit state funds from going to religious schools in 37 state constitutions, are unconstitutional.
For the first time in our nation's history, a federal court
heard arguments as to whether living, breathing, feeling beings have rights and can be enslaved simply because they happen to not have been born human.