This is just an out for those who need to explain their rationale on why they don't
hedge currency risk, and thus have performed poorly during the last few years.
I haven't read it fully yet but it seems to support the view that foreign investors should
not hedge their currency exposure in US stocks due to negative correlation between US currency fluctuation and stock market returns.
While iShares
hedges currencies in its MSCI EAFE Index Fund (XIN), it does not do so with another of its popular international funds, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund (XEM).
If hedging currency costs 1.5 % to 2 % every year, the drag is so large that a currency has to depreciate a lot just to break even.
Many individuals / financial institutions regards those who
hedge currency as making a call on currency movements.
Consequently, we are not going to
hedge the currency for 2005 and would expect better returns from our U.S. - denominated holdings.
Read more on our FX scorecard, and
on hedging currency risk in general, in our full Global insights piece Getting a Grip on FX.
Gopaul adds that,
by hedging currency exposure, the new ETFs provide investors with more choice in how they invest, depending on their currency views.
CWO
also hedges the currency exposure of the fund, which is of dubious benefit given the high costs involved in the form of tracking errors.
In reality though, XSP lost 13.7 % in the 2006 - 2009 time period, which is more than the loss experienced by a Canadian investor who directly invested in the S&P 500 and did not
hedge the currency fluctuations even though the US dollar depreciated 10.2 % that period.
As a derivatives specialist and someone
who hedges currency via futures, I thought this was an excellent, excellent article....
As we've explained,
funds hedge currency using instruments called currency forwards, typically updating these contracts once a month, which means they can't track daily fluctuations.
The verdict on currency - hedging then (based on an admittedly short history of just 6 years) is clear: Long - term investors are highly unlikely to profit
from hedging their currency exposure because currency effects have to overcome significantly large tracking errors simply to break even.
International stocks could rise from the benefits of improved economic growth, and
hedging the currency means any dollar appreciation associated with higher rates won't harm investors.
They consider a range of arguments for owning gold, such as: (1) gold hedges inflation; (2)
gold hedges currency decline; (3) gold is attractive when other assets are not; (4) gold is a safe haven in times of crisis; (5) gold is a de facto world currency; and, (6) central banks and investors in aggregate are still underweighting gold.
While the percentage of revenues breakdown by the U.S. and international matters for performance as the dollar fluctuates, in some cases, the companies hedge or
partially hedge currency moves, so the currency impact is muted.
Deutsche Bank says it pays about 41 basis points on an asset - weighted basis to
hedge currencies across its emerging - market fund, buying forward contracts on each currency exposure within the ETF.
When you hedge foreign currency exposure, you also give up any real interest rate differential over the long - term, and given the general profile of real interest rates internationally versus the U.S.,
fully hedging currency exposure hasn't been a good long - term policy.
TDB904 hedges the currency exposure for a small extra fee of 0.15 % and is designed to provide the same total return as the S&P 500 in its local currency, in this case the US dollar.
When you invest in large multinational companies, you are indirectly gaining exposure to currency activity as many large
companies hedge their currency exposure.
Why would one wants to
hedge a currency with a positive real interest rate against one with a negative real interest rate?
A second home in Miami has been a popular option for decades for Brazil's wealthy, but new options are also becoming available to help
investors hedge currency risk and take advantage of better conditions than they encounter at home.
However,
hedging currency becomes more difficult when investors hold on to an asset for a long period of time, Moore added.
In other words, the currency fluctuations a Canadian investor is exposed to for a foreign stock (or ETF) traded in an US exchange (that does
not hedge its currency fluctuations) is not the CAD / USD rate.
That said, current market conditions have a lot of people asking about our stance
on hedging currency risk.
One could
also hedge the currency exposure by taking positions in long or short positions in ETFs that track major currencies, which could be attractive if you can't trade foreign exchange futures.
For investors who do want to
hedge the currency in their foreign investments, our pick is the BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD (ZDM).
@ anon: CC has a post covering this topic - April 17th 2007 - one of his comments «My personal preference is to invest directly in US - listed ETFs
without hedging currency exposure because in my opinion, hedging is simply chasing performance after the Canadian dollar has run up significantly.
For US Dynamic Hedging clients during the quarter, hedging returns in the programmes were negative, as the US dollar weakened against the weighted basket
of hedged currencies.
I think one thing we haven't talked about here is, on the bond side, is we advocate 100 % to
hedging the currency risk on fixed income, and we have not talked about that yet.
Some fund managers will try to
hedge the currency risk, says HighView's Hallett, but it is a complicated process, and every manager takes a different approach.
Ontario may be
hedging the currency risk, but there's little clarity on how effective it has been.
That helps take care of a long - standing problem, and the only way it could be managed was if
we hedged the currency as a global company.
Phrases with «to hedge currency»