Sentences with phrase «to increase government spending»

Simply increasing government spending on education may no longer be a viable option for federal and state policymakers.

This results in slower growth and thus tax receipts, whilst simultaneously increasing government spending through pensions and healthcare.

But whether increasing government spending will boost or harm the economy is obviously a hot topic of political debate.

They don't want to support a measure that will increase government spending without an offset somewhere else.

That's because low prices for oil and other commodities will likely continue to offset increased government spending and higher exports due to a low Canadian dollar.

It will increase government spending on core AI programs to $ 22 billion in the next few years, with plans to spend nearly $ 60 billion per year by 2025.

Despite the expectation of increased government spending on defense and related technologies, most classes of government - related office occupiers are not enjoying such favorable circumstances.

«We are confident that its fantastic location with close proximity to Ho Chi Minh City, coupled with increased government spending on infrastructure, will ensure Phu Quoc continues to gain recognition as a world - class destination to attract a growing number of domestic and international travellers,» said David Wray, vice president of development and acquisitions, Wyndham Hotel Group, south - east Asia.

He sees upside risk to S&P's forecast of 2.8 percent real growth in the economy this year — in large part because of the fiscal stimulus of the recent budget ($ 300 billion in increased government spending over two years) and of the tax cuts that take effect this year.

President - elect Trump is planning to cut taxes and increase government spending as well as to take initiatives to secure new and existing American jobs.

The minutes showed Fed officials were confident inflation would return to their 2 % target as tax cuts and increased government spending provide a boost to the economy.

The risk to the upside — higher growth, inflation and interest rates — is that the tax cuts and increased government spending overheat the economy.

Then Congress passed a plan increasing government spending, tossing more logs onto the fire.

Those who run the Fed are despondent that despite implementing for eight YEARS an interest rate policy specifically designed to enable Obama to create a totally false illusion of economic «recovery» by massively increasing government spending with trillions of phony, deficit, zero - interest - rate «dollars,» the people saw through the economic lie and defeated the Fed's next intended puppet, Clinton.

It has pushed for economic progressivism, including higher taxes on the wealthy, and increased government spending programs.

By accounting for these assumptions, the researchers developed an impartial version of the model, which found that every dollar of increased government spending results in more than a dollar's worth of GDP growth.

Then again, as some folks have highlighted recently, even austerity talk in Europe seems pretty much an illusion — did you know it apparently means to «generally increase government spending at a slightly slower pace `..!?

There is also speculation that rates will continue to rise with the expectation of increased government spending alongside reduced taxes under the Trump administration.

The expected macroeconomic impact of the December 2017 tax reform, particularly the lower corporate tax rate and the temporary full expensing of investment, together with increased government spending, will begin to be felt in the second quarter and emerges as a powerful fiscal stimulus in the remainder of the year and in 2019.

Even though Trump's trade and immigration policies are unconventional and his fiscal policy is a bit vague, he has spoken numerous times about his desire to increase government spending on infrastructure projects and reduce taxes (fiscal policy stimulus).

O'Neil said he's skeptical about the assumptions that a Trump agenda of increased government spending and tax cuts will be fully enacted and lead to faster growth, higher inflation and bigger budget deficits.

The survey didn't ask how people would view these proposals if the increased government spending they required might raise taxes.

«Increased government spending, particularly more infrastructure investment financed primarily by higher taxes on the well - to - do, acts as an economic stimulant.»

Faster economic growth, spurred by a $ 1.5 trillion tax cut package and increased government spending, is also seen stoking inflation.

Faster economic growth, driven by a $ 1.5 trillion tax cut package and increased government spending, is also seen stoking inflation.

The labor market is healthy, corporate bottom lines are doing well, and the economy is likely to see additional benefits from tax cuts and increased government spending.

The stimulus was to be implemented in 2009 and 2010 and could take the form of either increased government spending and / or tax cuts.

Inflation is also likely to be fanned by an anticipated pickup in economic growth, driven by a $ US1.5 trillion tax cut package and increased government spending.

Business economists are expressing optimism that tax cuts and increased government spending will accelerate economic growth over the next two years.The latest survey by the National Association for Business Economics projects that the economy will grow...

Some economists have raised concerns that recent moves by the Trump administration and Congress to boost economic growth through $ 1.5 trillion in tax cuts and increased government spending could cause the Fed to worry about overheating and inflation.

The report struck a brighter note for the US by pointing to strong economic performance, with real GDP growth of 2.9 percent forecast for this year on the back of the recent tax package and increased government spending.

And inflation would pick up (due to increased government spending, higher US wages, pressure on China to push up the RMB and, possibly, tariffs).

Rather, Krugman argued, increased government spending could help ease unemployment.

Before followers of Mr. Summers» thesis rush to increase government spending, policymakers might consider the extent to which their imperfect understanding of economic reality, burdens of business regulation, and policy churn cause a business to reject new investment.

Given the sad state of our highways, public transportation systems and other material infrastructure, as well as the severe needs of our educational system, increased government spending in these areas could take up the slack in declining defense expenditures while contributing enormously to the potential productivity of the United States.

Anyone who considers themselves a conservative SHOULD be for legalizing marijuana since the prohibition of marijuana and prosecution of marijuana users involves everything conservatives are against: intrusion into private lives of citizens, over arching government control, increased government spending and waste and it goes completely against the idea that every person has «the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.»

The result would be that QE for People bypasses the financial markets and gets money straight into the real economy, either through increased government spending or by transferring it to the pockets of the people who will spend it.

But then I read that Obama has massively - and I mean massively - increased government spending.

These costs arise from a range of adverse outcomes for the individual, such as reduced earnings and increased government spending on education, social care, and youth and criminal justice.»

In March, the Kansas Supreme Court also found that the state was failing to meet these constitutional requirements and ordered lawmakers to devise a new funding formula to increase government spending on the state's public education system.

Increased government spending would drive prices up, thereby sending Treasury bond yields higher.

That's because low prices for oil and other commodities will likely continue to offset higher exports due to a low Canadian dollar, as well as increased government spending.

Of course, Republicans tend to shy away from any proposal to increase government spending, but clean energy is a strategic national resource with too much risk for the private sector to bear alone.

Rising labor costs, increased government spending, and prolonged housing shortages are the main pressure points.