Sentences with phrase «to pay for an asset»

What an investors pays for an asset directly impacts the forward return an investor is likely to receive.

The amount paid for asset maintenance or the cost of doing business.

According to the same person, expenses - including costs paid for the assets and adjusted for tax deductions - equate to around 60 percent of the gross credits earned.

Cost of capital: This is the true cost of securing the funds that the business uses to pay for its asset base.

The farmer shareholders upon completion of deal will own the cash paid for the assets.

Additionally, car loans pay for an asset that decreases in value, which offsets your overall net worth.

All book value tells you is how much a company paid for its assets, minus the depreciation required by accounting standards, with no adjustment for subsequent inflation.

The higher the price an investor pays for an asset, the less he should expect to earn.

Add up the prices paid for all assets currently being depreciated (note this is done on a cost basis rather than using the value of assets after depreciation).

Regardless of who paid what, once it is established as the matrimonial home and you have occupied it as such, all money paid for the asset is considered to be a matrimonial asset.

The ultra-conservative stance is that the creation of the banking system reserves that the Fed uses to pay for its asset purchases is potentially highly inflationary.

So if you're going into a hyper - growth period for a long period of time... buying companies with high growth and paying for that growth versus paying for assets would obviously outperform if the next few years the economy was booming.

who legally owns the property, which is often the person who paid for the asset) and a set of complicated common law concepts known as constructive trusts (where a legal owner can be deemed to actually hold part of an asset in trust for another).

US investors can now join their Token Sale — they can buy LAT as a utility token to support transactions at the LAT platform, for example pay for asset tokenization.

Echoing statements recently made by a Citi executive, Jaffrey explained that paying for assets tokenized on a blockchain with traditional fiat currency ran the risk of reintroducing the same security vulnerabilities of the centralized model.

If anything, they are looking more skeptically at the prices buyers are willing to pay for assets relative to the income from the properties.

There is room for a new risk model based on the idea that risk is unique among individuals, and inversely related to the price paid for an asset.

When the Fed purchases securities or makes a loan, it pays for these asset acquisitions with funds created figuratively out of thin air.

Obviously, this makes sense, because there are only two methods that a company can use to raise cash for operations (i.e. to pay for their assets).

You will learn why it matters so dearly the price you pay for your assets and the importance of having a margin of safety.

n.b. while Stocks are normally riskier than Bonds, the price you pay for an asset affects its inherent riskiness i.e. if you overpay for a «safe asset», it becomes riskier, as it will be harder to make a profit, and vice versa.

The difference between the value of an asset (like a car or home) and the balance of a loan used to pay for that asset.

You will learn why it matters so dearly the price you pay for your assets and the importance of having a margin of safety.

Every time you sell shares of an investment — stock, bond, exchange traded fund (ETF), mutual fund or whatever — in a taxable account you will pay capital - gains tax on the difference between what you paid for the asset and what you sold it for.

Obviously, this makes sense, because there are only two methods that a company can use to raise cash for operations (i.e. to pay for their assets).

Other investments carry a low risk of you losing the money you pay for the asset.

What you paid for an asset has no bearing on the future price.

The difference between the value of an asset (like a car or home) and the balance of a loan used to pay for that asset.

Third, there is nothing to assure that fair market value will be paid for assets.

In this case, yes, the amount of money that people are willing to pay for the assets will dictate the initial price, unless the deal is received so poorly that it does not take place.

The bid - ask spread is essentially the difference between the highest price that a buyer is willing to pay for an asset and the lowest price that a seller is willing to accept to sell it.

If something in those fundamentals changes for the worse; or the price people are willing to pay for those assets is more than they are worth, a smart investor will sell.

Time is inescapable, costs are very low in a properly structured plan, and the fact that you have to pay for the asset with after - tax dollars is the price paid to receive the tax - advantaged growth.

«An investor who buys a building or an entire corporation gives a great deal of attention to the price to be paid for the asset.

A portfolio that includes many stocks just because they have a big weight in the index (a result of their having gone up a lot) may go down sharply and still carry risk — no cushion there to begin with... An investor who buys a building or an entire corporation gives a great deal of attention to the price to be paid for the asset.

«But they need a strong signal that companies and developed country governments are ready to pay for those assets.

Bitcoin assets have also diminished because Overstock made a number of bitcoin payments: for instance, it paid its

I am just a scientific, black and white, thinker and «Cap rate» is simply a formula: It's the price you pay for an asset vs the net anual returns.

The most important thing is to collect records showing what you paid for the assets likely to be in your estate.

You state, «It's the price you pay for an asset vs the net anual returns.»