Sentences with phrase «to receive educational benefits»

To what extent are special education students receiving educational benefit from the programs and services provided?
Must districts merely ensure that students receive some educational benefit, however trivial it may be?
If services are provided, the parents consult with me because the school is providing services that are not appropriate and the child is falling further and further behind and is not receiving educational benefit.
Fresno State's Veterans Services Office assists veterans, reservists / Guard / active duty service members and dependents receive their educational benefits.
Mrs. Gleason received no educational benefit from the Loans which would increase her ability to repay the loans.
Alexandria, Va. (December 22, 2016)- The National School Boards Association (NSBA) along with the California School Boards Association and its Legal Alliance Fund, the Colorado Association of School Boards, and the Horace Mann League have filed an amicus brief in Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District RE-1 asking the court to uphold the standard the Court established in the Rowley case decades ago that provides for students to receive an educational benefit from their special education.
In its opinion, the Supreme Court determined that Endrew's «making some progress,» found acceptable by the lower courts, was not «reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits,» noting that it was barely better than «sitting idly in classrooms waiting until they were old enough to drop out.»
The question of what «reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits» means came before the Supreme Court in Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District.
Because the IEP in that case was clearly «reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits» — the child was excelling in her classes — the court declined to decide what «reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits» might look like for all students with disabilities under the IDEA.
In 1982, in Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District, Westchester County v. Rowley, the Supreme Court determined that the IDEA's FAPE requirement was met if a student's IEP was «reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits» and «to enable the child to achieve passing marks and advance from grade to grade.»
As long as an IEP was «reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits,» the school district had complied with the law.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z