And I know plenty of teachers — so I assume she does too — who agree with today's focus
on removing ineffective teachers from the classroom: they understand that bad / abusive teachers are a HUGE problem, and that the impact they have on children and schools is devastating.
Cuomo took up the mantle, proposing in his State of the State speech in 2015 to «reform the process to make it easier, fairer and faster to
remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.»
Thus, the union leadership reluctantly embraced a reform - minded contract that will make it much easier to
remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.
And sure enough, just last week, Washington's union leadership reluctantly embraced a reform - minded contract that will make it much easier to
remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.
Under a state - appointed superintendent, the district pursued a wide - ranging reform agenda, including a major new teacher contract and evaluation system intended to retain and reward the district's effective teachers and
remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.
Cuomo took up the mantle, proposing in his State of the State speech in 2015 to «reform the process to make it easier, fairer and faster to
remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.»
The thrust of the students» case is that five state statutes make it difficult and expensive to
remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.
Judge Treu found that this time period was far too short to exclude ineffective teachers, and that the job security protections made it onerous to
remove ineffective teachers from classrooms.