Critics also fear that when a moratorium on using the test results for teacher evaluations ends, teachers who do
n't teach to the test will be penalized.
I think the more opportunities teachers have to collaborate and share expectations and goals, the more schools can move away
from teaching to the test.
While studies find a negative relationship between test preparation and instructional quality, some experts believe that concerns
about teaching to the test may be exaggerated.
In return, grant schools flexibility: To teach with creativity and passion; to
stop teaching to the test; and to replace teachers who just aren't helping kids learn.
Sadly, fearful educators understandably feel driven to
teach to the test instead of working to ensure that students meet genuine academic standards (and letting the test results follow naturally).
This might be the reality, but the truth is, you will never be
happy teaching to a test — nor will you find much success.
Teaching to the test involves a narrow focus on the specific skills and content covered by the test, as well as considerable time spent on practice tests and test - taking strategies.
Additionally, when asked how the use of student growth measures has affected their own instruction, the most common response is increase
of teaching to the test.
The CT Mirror piece also mentions Malloy's anti-teacher, anti-public education reform initiatives although it doesn't contain Malloy's equally famous comment that he didn't
mind teaching to the test as long as the test scores went up.
Where US schools were encouraged to compete against other government - funded schools, for instance, the institutions started
teaching to the test in order to improve their rankings.
Following its release Vicki Phillips, the head of education at the Gates Foundation, told the New York Times: «
Teaching to the test makes your students do worse on the tests.»
For example, do teachers who raise test scores also improve their students» outcomes in adulthood or are they simply better
at teaching to the test?
Teachers, under enormous pressure, are forced to
teach to the tests rather than, you know, teach critical thinking or creative expression; and education is reduced to something rote, linear and boring.
Obama's — and the Education Department's — claim that NCLB will diminish
teaching to the test because it will allow states to develop their own school accountability systems that measure students» growth, instead of the raw proficiency scores.
The evidence from Florida also suggests that the gains produced by such an accountability system are real indicators of improvement in learning, and not
simply teaching to the test, cheating, or other manipulations of the testing system.
As the Courant knows, Dan Malloy and the «education reformers» have put an inordinate weight on the role of standardized testing (i.e. his comment that he supports
teaching to the test so the test scores go up).
Supporters» arguments of better prepared students, emphasis on critical thinking and
less teaching to the test were favored by a two - to - one margin.