When Catherine
wrote the Constitution for our Apostolate, she placed at the beginning the law of love, for «the primary work of the Apostolate is that we love one another... This is the greatest work of the Apostolate.
Relying on the words of the delegates themselves to explore the Convention's sharp conflicts and hard bargaining, David O. Stewart lays out the passions and contradictions of the often painful process
of writing the Constitution.
Actually, it's the Constitution State officially because a historian named John Fiske claimed that the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut were the first
written constitution in the western tradition.
Americans are typically distrustful of their government as a whole, and the people
who wrote the Constitution definitely numbered in this crowd (many being the folks who rebelled against British rule).
Then of course I remembered that many human rights zealots mirror this attitude — paying lip - service to HRA's respect for primary legislation, but using arguments that betray a hankering for
written constitutions which embed those rights to be protected by judges against upstart parliaments.
Actually, it's the Constitution State officially because a historian named John Fiske claimed that the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut were the
first written constitution in the western tradition.
We must seek discernment for how to live here on earth — not through the stereotypes of «heavenly minded and of no earthly use» Christians or «zealot Shi'ite» Muslims who only wreak havoc — but by becoming catalysts for governments that
write constitutions such as that of South Africa and catalysts for public repentance, vowing never to harm another human being, as with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa.
I'm not aware of a single country outside the 5 below that don't have a
codified written constitution and are considered democratic: Of course, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, as...
I now think there is both a strategic / pragmatic case for AV, but also (in the right broader reform package) a good argument for it being good to have a pluralist majoritarian system for the Commons, within an
entrenched written constitution and with a PR - elected second chamber.
Like a dinosaur with its head removed, the doctrine will no doubt continue to stumble on, but it is high time it was put out of its misery in favour of a codified and
justiciable written constitution.»
Recently the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee ran an open public competition to find who can write the best Preamble — or introductory statement — for a
modern Written Constitution for the UK.
A British «constitutional convention» would presumably adopt (or suggest to a national referendum the adoption of) a
truly written constitution specifying the ways that a clearly «federalized» country will operate in the future.
For better or worse, Great Britain has often preferred to «muddle through» quite remarkable changes in its governing structure without the full - scale reconsideration of some of its own foundational presuppositions, the most important one of which, of course, is the sovereignty of the singular Westminster Parliament and the ability to maintain the proposition that the United Kingdom has no need for a
canonical written constitution.
The
terms written constitution and codified constitution are often used interchangeably, as are unwritten constitution and uncodified constitution, although this usage is technically inaccurate.
While the initial draft required that any changes be made by amendments, some participants at the convention that
wrote this constitution argued that legislators should be free to determine their own pay and submitted new language that would allow this.
That's not a very attractive idea, especially to the people who get to
write constitutions so I would be very surprised if it did exist anywhere.
openDemocracy's founder explains why Britain must go for a
fully written constitution, and why a constitutional convention is necessary to achieve that.
If we could
write the constitution all over again we should give ALL education power to the feds and the school boards and cut the states out totally.
By December, 1998, all Club members participated in a ballot to ratify the
newly written Constitution, Bylaws, Code of Ethics, and Breed Standard of the SVCA.
When the
founders wrote the constitution of the United States of America, the first amendment stated that «Congress shall make no law... abridging... the right of the people peaceably to assemble.»
It noted that «[a] written constitution...
The Constitution of India is the
longest written constitution of any sovereign country in the world, containing 444 articles in 22 parts, 12 schedules, 118 amendments, and comprised of 146,385 words.
Last week saw the launch of the Political and Constitutional Reform Select Committee's The UK Constitution — a pocket - sized,
written constitution for the UK.
Much like Paul, he was a strict constitutionalist, and believed that «devious government intervention in the economic affairs of the nation... [were] not contemplated by the men
who wrote the constitution.»
It should not be asked to devise a
full written constitution: that would open up too many controversies and would only raise the barriers to successful implementation of the key changes that are needed.
State - by - state winner - take - all laws to award electoral college votes were eventually enacted by 48 states AFTER the Founding
Fathers wrote the Constitution.
Chancellor Gordon Brown, who will become prime minister in days, suggested in May that Britain could get its
first written constitution, saying: «We need a constitution that is clear about the rights and responsibilities of being a citizen in Britain today.»
The Founding Fathers clearly worked through trial and error in
writing the Constitution, informed by firm ideals as to what should and must work.
Politics is more akin to a mirror than a comb, and the unwritten constitution of hearts and minds constrains the interpretive boundaries of
the written Constitution.