The phrase
"tobacco companies" refers to businesses that produce and sell tobacco products, typically cigarettes, cigars, and chewing tobacco.
Full definition
Some environmentalists have compared the tactic to that once used
by tobacco companies, which for decades insisted that the science linking cigarette smoking to lung cancer was uncertain.
Some good examples are: a class action lawsuit
against tobacco companies, bans on drilling for oil and gas companies, or the creation of generic drugs for pharmaceutical companies.
This shifted about two decades ago, when high carbon producers hired the same public relations team that worked with
big tobacco companies.
Some are all in
with tobacco companies investing heavily, but for others, the market is rife with complications.
For the first time in 20 years an advertisement from a
large tobacco company has appeared on British TV screens.
And even more were in favour of increasing funding for the NHS by # 2.5 billion, partially through increased taxes
on tobacco companies.
You could argue that
if tobacco companies had a monopoly on lung health research, it's possible that the damaging effects of tobacco smoke would not have come out as quickly.
For these reasons people avoid owning
tobacco companies which keeps the price of their stocks cheap and their dividend yields high.
They actively promoted the use of lead paint for interior use, knowing it was hazardous to children, much in the same
way tobacco companies promoted smoking.
Its authors say their findings challenge the claim
by tobacco companies that marketing has far less of an impact on adolescent smoking than social factors.
The most recent example should become the poster child for how the most egregious tactics
of tobacco companies are alive and well.
Meanwhile cigarette consumption is on the rise in much of the developing world, thanks in no small part to strong marketing
from tobacco companies.
In recent years, the efforts
against tobacco companies have increased, and people have actually begun winning lawsuits against these companies.
Ontario's statement of claim alleges that the defendant
tobacco companies knew about the addictiveness of cigarettes and the health damages they caused and deceived the public by misrepresenting the risks.
He believes that the popularly «conservative» refusal to relate global warming to human activity is like
tobacco company executives» denial of a link between smoking and lung cancer.
Separately, numerous Canadian provinces are teaming up to
sue tobacco companies in hopes of recovering billions of healthcare dollars spent to treat the victims of tobacco use.
Like big
tobacco companies who paid pretend scientists to make up pretend research to fight back against the scientific body of evidence linking tobacco smoke to cancer, there is now a well - documented history of coal and oil companies paying unqualified experts to attack climate science research with the goal of stalling climate change policies that would impact their bottom lines.
Barnoya, who studies tobacco sales and antismoking efforts in Guatemala,
says tobacco companies there secure customers by directly violating the law or by finding creative ways around it.
When tobacco companies like Reynolds American or Altria / Philip Morris want to avoid tobacco taxes and health regulations, reports by SPN groups in many states can help inspire local resistance.
, for owning shares in
tobacco companies while voting to do their bidding in Congress and for getting a «sweetheart deal» on biotech stock.
A Federal Court has ruled that the Defendant
tobacco companies deliberately deceived the American public about the addictiveness of smoking and nicotine, and has ordered those companies to make this statement.
The Campaign for Tobacco - Free Kids and other public health groups recently urged the Justice Department to recuse any lawyers who
represented tobacco companies from any tobacco - related litigation while serving in the government, specifically mentioning Mr. Readler and Noel Francisco, the nominee for Solicitor General, who long represented R.J. Reynolds in tobacco litigation while at Jones Day.
This approach is often called the «tobacco strategy», because
tobacco companies used it effectively to delay health warnings and regulation of smoking.»
Even tobacco companies have admitted that nicotine is addictive, but exactly why the brain craves another cigarette is murky.
Al Gore cited that same
tobacco company memo in his 2006 «An Inconvenient Truth» movie, right before he spelled out the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase full screen.
As nicotine use spreads across Africa, cancer - fighting groups are advocating for stringent smoke - free laws as
tobacco companies lobby to expand in a growing continental market
She added that, just as investors reevaluated whether to put their money into
tobacco companies after evidence emerged linking cigarettes to cancer, «this will begin to cause investors to look at the potential global - warming liability that companies that refuse to limit their greenhouse gas emissions will face.»
The ISPM is published by the industry - supported Fraser Institute which received over $ 60,000 from ExxonMobil and which is also financially - supported by several
tobacco companies including Philip Morris and British American Tobacco.
Also interesting are Robertson's comments about major
tobacco companies getting ready to jump into the market (presumably through acquisitions) if and when recreational pot becomes legal.
«I conclude that all the claims of Imperial [Tobacco] and the
other tobacco companies brought against the government of Canada are bound to fail,» Supreme Court Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in the long, complex, and unanimous 9 - 0 judgment.
Phrases with «tobacco companies»