Sentences with phrase «tobacco companies knew»

Ontario's statement of claim alleges that the defendant tobacco companies knew about the addictiveness of cigarettes and the health damages they caused and deceived the public by misrepresenting the risks.

The tobacco companies knew of the dangers well before the 1960s but never informed the public, and the companies disputed emerging scientific evidence of the risks.

The «You've Come a Long Way, Baby» campaign ran through the 1980s, well after tobacco companies knew that smoking can cause lung cancer.

``... to explore the following four questions: (a) What did tobacco companies know about the health risks of smoking and when did they know it?

Not exact matches

By 2003, Philip Morris wanted its consumers to know that it was «more than a tobacco company.»

Once upon a time, tobacco's links to cancer weren't well - known, and Philip Morris was a perfectly viable name for a company.

Some funds filter out some companies — tobacco companies and petroleum producers are two common types — or filter in companies known for responsible strategies.

But that won't happen b / c formula companies give $ $ $ $ $ $ to government and others to just shush up and keep quiet...... just leave it be.They scratch the big man's back and the big man scratches their back.EXactly like the tobacco companies and the companies pumping out Genetically Modified food to people who do not know the facts.Very misleading.

«Whether you go back to tobacco companies or to oil companies with lead in gasoline, the companies knew there was a problem,» said Brian Nowak, who is serving his first year on the Cheektowaga Town Board.

The state Democratic Committee's 2000 pledge not to accept tobacco money seems to no longer be in force, NYPIRG noted: It took $ 45,000 from tobacco companies in 2011 through 2013.

Companies are known to upcharge at least double the standard rate if you have used any type of tobacco in the last year.

The genesis of this idea for DOJ to investigate fossil fuel companies lies in the comparison between the actions of the fossil fuel industry and the actions of other industries known to have intentionally misled the public about the nature of their products, including the tobacco and lead paint industries.

The likes of Tom Harris, better known for his lobbying work on behalf of the Canadian energy industry, and Fred Singer, formally a tobacco company expert - for - hire, are trying to make headlines again claiming that the warming of our planet has significantly slowed down.

And like the «experts» paid by tobacco companies to discredit the link between lung cancer and cigarettes, these spin doctors also know that doubt is their product and their most powerful weapon — climategate proved it.

«Just as it doesn't make sense for organisations whose purpose is to safeguard health to profit from the tobacco industry, health institutions can no longer justify investing in fossil fuel companies but need to start investing in clean energy solutions.»

I've no doubt the proponents of this idi0cy have something like this in mind, but for tobacco, AFAIK, all that happened is that the companies responsible were required to stop.

If I understand the case correctly, the final outcome of the judgement against tobacco companies was to order them to stop denying known harms of smoking and to publicize the falsity of their fraudulent statements.

The politicians are requesting that the Justice Department look into whether Exxon violated the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) law, which federal officials used to prosecute tobacco companies in the 1990s for lying about what they knew about the health impacts of smoking.

Lord knows the tobacco companies would not have done it willingly.

Not long ago, lawsuits were filed against cigarette companies for all the suffering caused by smoking, saying tobacco executives fully knew their product was a killer when they hired shill experts to testify and report that there wasn't a clear connection between smoking and lung cancer.

The cases make the claim that the «Global Climate Coalition» was a front group operating in tobacco industry - like fashion with the fossil fuel company defendants to misinform the public while supposedly knowing their «contrarian» views were unfounded.

«We know that General Motors has been paying for this fake science exactly as the tobacco companies did,» says ED attorney Jim Marston.

It has been long known (by tobacco companies and scientists) that strong cigarette addiction is most often created during the teenage years while brains are developing quickly.

Ronald S. Milstein, general counsel for Lorillard Inc., LO -0.76 % said the tobacco company uses Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, a well - known New York law firm, to handle corporate work and national product - liability litigation.

Even the best term life insurance companies that are known as the most liberal in the underwriting department will take your tobacco use into strong consideration.

However, I know of one company who sets no limit to the amount you use these forms of tobacco, and your urine result can also come back positive for nicotine, and they'll still allow you to qualify for non tobacco rates!

While it is true that the usage of virtually all tobacco products may affect the rates for life insurance, many reputable companies do not just throw blanket high premium rates on all people known to be using tobacco products.

When you apply for a life insurance policy, the insurance company is going to want to know several things about you, they will want to know your age, gender, how much coverage you want, an idea of your overall health and they will also want to know if you use any tobacco products.

Read on to learn more about the best life insurance companies for former smokers, and what you should know about your former tobacco use.

Life insurance companies aren't just testing for illegal drugs, but also for alcohol and tobacco use as well, you should know more about the life insurance drug tests before applying for life insurance

In addition, you have to be careful when answering questions about your health when applying for life insurance because every insurance company will want to know if you are a cigarette smoker, but this is a different type of tobacco use.

We work with multiple companies, so we know which ones take other factors (i.e. overall health) into consideration, and which companies differentiate between frequent and occasional tobacco use, so you get the best rates available.

Whether you're looking for the best term life insurance for chewing tobacco users or the cheapest whole life insurance policy, we know which companies offer these non-smoker rates.

The first step is to get your feet wet and run a life insurance quoting tool otherwise known as a quote engine to get the feel of what life insurance companies are available and who is showing the lowest rates for your face amount, age, tobacco status, and plan design such as low cost Term life insurance or the excellent permanent type life insurance referred to as Universal life.

The company will want to know the age of the applicant, as well as the height, weight, gender, alcohol usage, tobacco usage, income, occupation, and lifestyle and any dangerous hobbies.

Companies are known to upcharge at least double the standard rate if you have used any type of tobacco in the last year.

So, taking (i) these things into consideration i would like to know what kind of statements i have to make before any insurance company to make settlement process smooth in case of any mishappenings (ii) if a person is a tobacco users then premium increases for the same sum assured but what happens if a person is a alcohol users?