Christians have to corrupt the clear meanings in the bible because they are more moral
today than the fundamental basis of the religion.
Not exact matches
In
today's environment, this can be done by maintaining higher -
than - average long exposure — and tilting into the weakness that's slammed the markets to buy specific stocks with strong long - term
fundamentals.
The UN Human Rights Committee, which regularly reviews whether states are living up to their obligations under the binding International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
today made more
than a dozen recommendations for
fundamental changes in Canadian law and policy in respect to the treatment of First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples.
According to Hunt, long - term investors like PGIM see the longer - run market
fundamentals and sentiment as «much more important
than whether we get a bounce of a couple of dollars on Brent
today or not.
Because these
fundamentals are just now being built, Bitcoin might be cheaper
today than it was a month ago, becoming a better deal, because of these network effects.
The
fundamental question that Bonhoeffer poses before us is «If religion is no more
than a «garment of Christianity» which must now be cast aside because it has lost its meaning in a «world come of age», if the real problem facing Christianity
today is not so much that of religionlessness, but precisely that of religion, then what does all this mean for the church?»
Its worship may be more varied
today than it was in earlier decades, and its leadership may now be more representative of its members as a whole, but the
fundamental patterns of congregational culture that most of us encountered as children will probably cloak our aging and burial.
I second that, I believe the what people call «
fundamental»
today is anything but, fundamentalism wasn't a bad thing (just a few simple beliefs) but now it's become way too complex to be
fundamental, I mean some of the most complex stuff on earth (DNA) is simpler
than today's «fundamentalists»
The analogy isn't watertight — Britain's role as balancer was based in its
fundamental strength, whereas for France
today it's more about being considerably weaker
than Germany but aspiring to be viewed as its neighbour's equal.
Of course, it's all playing out more publicly / more quickly in Greece
today than in sub-Saharan Africa 20 years ago — maybe because the power imbalance isn't quite as large, so Greece has more room to manoeuvre — but the
fundamentals are remarkably similar.
It would also imply a
fundamental asymmetry between matter and antimatter that would go some way toward explaining why the universe
today contains far more matter
than antimatter, even though equal amounts of each should have been made in the big bang.
The finding, reported here
today at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, publisher of ScienceNOW, suggests to the researcher that modern behaviors such as dolling up with jewelry may have originated from a need to communicate rather
than a
fundamental change in the human brain.
I'm much more hopeful
today than I was 20 years ago that we will see some
fundamental changes in education.
The
fundamental purpose of higher education is more
than teaching the
today's facts.
The assumption is the saver will need that money more in 30 years
than today, when housing prices seem stretched beyond economic
fundamentals.
Today, there may not be the backdrop of economic crisis that we had six years ago, but the
fundamentals (in the short term) for oil have been impaired much more
than was the case in 2008 - 2009.
Today, having mastered the
fundamentals of science, we know more about nutrition
than ever before — and we are obsessed.
Today, curators prefer to refer to it as digital art or new media art because this implies it is more serious or
fundamental than simply the adoption of a new tool.
It not only acknowleges the changing nature of labour relationships in
today's economy, but it is also an approach that is line with one of the
fundamental purposes of the EU treaties: to create a social market economy which is sufficiently reflective of other societal interests
than just protecting effective competition.
Update: Collins returned to the theme of the Facebook founder's reluctance to put in a personal appearance to answer questions about the issue more
than once during the four hour oral hearing, remarking later: «I must say that given the extraordinary evidence we've heard so far
today, and the things we've heard in the other enquiry, I think it's absolutely astonishing that Mark Zuckerberg is not prepared to submit himself to questioning in front of a parliamentary or congressional hearing given that these are questions of a
fundamental importance and concern to Facebook users and to our enquiry as well.»