Although many zero
tolerance policies mandate a limited range of consequences, we should consider interpreting rules and enforcement through the lens of school values.
Not exact matches
According to the American Psychologist study «Zero
Tolerance Policies,» such policies are widespread among schools nationwide which «mandates the application of predetermined consequences, most often severe and punitive in nature that are intended to be applied regardless of the gravity of behavior, mitigating circumstances or situational context
Policies,» such
policies are widespread among schools nationwide which «mandates the application of predetermined consequences, most often severe and punitive in nature that are intended to be applied regardless of the gravity of behavior, mitigating circumstances or situational context
policies are widespread among schools nationwide which «
mandates the application of predetermined consequences, most often severe and punitive in nature that are intended to be applied regardless of the gravity of behavior, mitigating circumstances or situational context.»
Events focused around three key demands: ending zero -
tolerance policies and implementing Restorative Justice, hiring more Black teachers in their schools, and
mandating Black History / Ethnic Studies in grades K - 12.
Many parents and students are familiar with zero -
tolerance policies: If a student violates a school rule, commonly related to drugs and weapons, these
policies mandate a harsh punishment, such as suspension or expulsion, regardless of extenuating circumstances or accidental mistakes.
During the 1990s, many school districts adopted zero -
tolerance disciplinary
policies mandating...
Since 1994, most jurisdictions have passed additional zero -
tolerance policies that extend well beyond those
mandated by federal law.