Sentences with phrase «too deep a well»

They remind me that our country has too deep a well of good people for any of us to lose hope in renewing the integrity of our public discourse.

Not exact matches

All too often, organizational cuts go too deep, taking out linchpin individuals and keepers of institutional memory, as well as unsung individual contributors who do the job of multiple people.

Dig Deeper: Telling a Good Story Online Small Business Website Design: Don't Forget the Mobile Web Not too long ago, we considered mobile sites a nice - to - have add on.

While it might be a stretch to call Melania Trump a genius, she certainly is in good company when it comes to speakers at political events digging a bit too deep into the well of previous great orations when crafting their own speeches.

«Deep digging is interesting, but you know equally effective can be just to go and speak to the incumbents and to offer them a deal that's too good to be true and make sure that that's video recorded.

One could well say the CCCU's statement is too thin to garner deep theological unity — but it may well answer back that its concerns are more practical.

He loves good coffee and beer, deep talks that keep him up too late, books and snobby films.

The presence of other divergences too (David Moss's luminous piece on friendship stands very well alone), the dispersal of the group on both sides of the Atlantic, and the fact that some members are already deep into other conversations all suggest that as a movement it will (at least in Britain) either fragment or at best fare like feminist, liberation and nonrealist theologies, and have its main influence as a point of reference and interrogation.

Nevertheless, to «know» such unseen things is simultaneously to admit that one does not, can not know; it is to understand that that of which one is sure — be it God or the good, the true and the beautiful — is also too high and too deep to be understood.

Too many years I spent shackled by fear and shame, telling myself and others that I was no good, that I was unworthy of love; but somewhere in the deepest recesses of my spirit was a flicker of something that knew differently.

Well, I think it's all just too deep for me.

Here, too, Legutko improves upon his predecessor by pinpointing the deep source of liberal hostility to orthodox religion in particular: Salvation is a good that is unequally distributed and thus amounts to the ultimate illegitimate privilege.

I have to keep reminding myself, and my good mentors always remind me too, that even though I make mistakes and even though I have my own deep - seated issues, this doesn't disqualify me from being passionate about healthy leadership and communities.

I feel a bit hypocritical admonishing my readers toward kindness and understanding when I too have been avoiding such conversations like the plague, but I do think healthy, constructive dialog is possible, and that it's best tackled around a shared table, over steaming plates of mashed potatoes and green beans, amidst the laughter and grace that emerges organically from deep, trusted relationships.

I sat down at the computer again to try to find a few words to say how I find God in this daily place and in this work, how I only learned to pray when I began to pray with my hands and my attention on purpose and how most of prayer to me now is listening and abiding, how I believe it would be nice to have a lovely housekeeper and a clean house and to create amazing soaring art with all of the white space of an uncluttered life and glorious heights of transcendent spirituality, I guess, but I need the God who sits in the mud and in the cold wind, in the laundry pile and in the city park, who embodies grief and joy, wisdom and patience, loneliness as companionship, renewal with simplicity and a good deep breath, and who even now shows up in the unlikeliest and homeliest of lives too, as a sacrament of and blessing for the ordinary things.

There too, I experienced music as a gift that could draw out the deeper cries of not just my heart, but the hearts of others as well.

I think a counselor is good if you need someone to talk to about the deeper stuff — of course good friends should be confided in — to a point — but not so that the friendship becomes just about that — because then it feels like a counseling relationship — and the friendship may be lost as you will associate that friend with your sin which you want to get rid of, and when you are free from the sin, you may want to be free from those associated with the sin too.

We should remember that early Christians too were well behaved — Paul advised them to remain in their jobs and their marriages — yet by withholding any deep commitment to the Roman Empire they helped to bring it down and to form a society of a very different type.

I think that was good point about being free it being something that is freeing for others too, or drivign people deeper into thier own self imposed bondage.

I agree with you Tim, the premise of the article leads one to believe that because LDS has a big accredited university with deep theological minds and some leader of a big Christian seminary, again a deep theological mind, head knowledge not heart knowledge, that Mormonism should be recognized as a stream of Christianity.How Mormons differ is how they relate to Christ and the Holy Spirit.Only people who have encountered Jesus and thus a changed life, can be called an evangelical.Mormnism is man made religion.The Holy Spirit always points people to Jesus, not another man - Joseph Smith.Great moral people, who do lots of good and build beautiful tabernacles, but then again the Pharisees did too.

In this, people can be inspirational, though many slip off the deep end with good intentions gone too far.

He keeps track of sin and good because mankind is too deep into themselves to pay enough attention.

The wells are not too deep and not too shallow, and the shape is only slightly angled from the base to the top.

Well, i was already in too deep when i read your response, but it think it still turned out really good!

left my chocolate pieces too big which meant my chocolate was a bit too deep a taste but otherwise very good with some vanilla ice cream.

Of course honey is still better than table sugar but even though if you are concerned about too much sugar in blood, like I am because of insulin resistance, you might want to go even deeper in making changes

I won't get into this too much now (we'll delve deeper into the best equipment for grain - grinding in another post), but our family has tried multiple grain - grinding options and we're the happiest with our Mockmill Grain Mill.

There are so many ways you can go about exfoliating now; physical scrubs (lots of easy DIY sugar ones out there, St Ives» products are affordable and good too), chemical peels, deep cleansing -LSB-...]

So good I never forgot having it just the once; — RRB - No, mine is not that good, but still super yummy, technically it should be much deeper but that was down to using a pie plate too big: --RRB-

I didn't think it would matter but then read a comment where someone's baking dish was potentially too deep and it didn't turn out well.

Before we get too deep into this, I'm aware of how good Jose Altuve is.

Who the hell picks ozil and tells the midfielders to keep dropping deep without applying pressure on the ball in the middle of the pitch (Ozil doesn't give a rats arse to move and Bayern are too good to let them just walk through the middle of the ground for the whole game)?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Cazorla (you'd imagine Wilshere too) does a good job in one of those deep lying positions when partnering Coquelin (& you would presume Elneny).

Its already too late for that, we can't win 2 matches on a spin as of now... Deep down I want the team to do well and move forward but it is highly unlikely we will make top4 to be realistic....

I have and just see too many things that make me think this pick would be like having fitz as a starter with a better deep ball and less accuracy in the short to mid range.

@J McLovin You can see it in the way he plays, that he's well aware of it too... But I would still throw him in at the deep end and make him do butterflies... He has a good engine and movement.

What frustrated me is seeing Ramsey constantly behind the opposition when getting back to defend because he was too Att minded, I would much prefer to see Xhaka and Wilshere in CM as Wilshere can sit deep better and not so gungho.

People have too easily dismissed them for this season they have a good manager and a deeper squad than past... Similar to lpool for me... Wenger hopes one will screw up and man utd will not revive....

Piniella knows too that the short first - round divisional series (best of five) helps, rather than handicaps, a lesser wild - card team against a deeper divisional champion.

Nevertheless, the fans have decided to remain positive and perhaps have looked too deep into this as seen in the reaction below, as many were convinced that the decision to share Ozil's best goals was simply just a pre-cursor to an announcement over a new contract.

Ramsey has had one good season for us since his horrible injury, he needlessly gives the ball away much too often and his finishing is even worse than Giroud's... once again we have fallen in love with the idea of what could have been... Ramsey has only scored 2 meaningful goals in his entire Arsenal tenure: one in Turkey and the other in last year's FA Cup, which is not near enough to make him a centerpiece of this offence... likewise simply his presence on the team sheet has led Wenger into making horrible tactical blunders because he will force Ramsey into the lineup even when it doesn't make sense... just think of all those games when Ramsey was played out wide on the right, which forced the RB to come up into the play far more often, and deeper, because Ramsey invariably would find himself in a more central position leaving us far more vulnerable to the counterattack..

I think both the goals came from a combination of Jenkinson could have done better to snuff out the cross and Coquelin just seeming off the pace, in other games I think he would have gotten to make the challenge but this time he was too deep and was just another body that the ball flew past.

This House of Cards created by the thin - skinned narcissist and our absentee landlord is going to come crashing down over the next 12 months and anyone who doesn't put the success of the club ahead of blind allegiances will need to check themselves so that we can move forward once the dust has settled... this club has been on auto - pilot for far too long and the same old, same old just won't cut it in the new EPL where many of the best managers, players and deepest pockets in the world now reside... just think to yourself what has transpired in the last 7 years alone: Leicester City won the EPL, Chelsea and ManCity have changed several managers and still won the League on multiple occasions, ManU lost Fergie yet we still didn't take advantage, Liverpool has emerged from their slumber and the Spurs are presently the better team in North London... if you find this acceptable, I feel for you and this future of this club... hope you all enjoy fighting with Everton and West Ham for the final Europa spot every year (aka the new Wenger Cup)

Both squads are veterans to All Sports Series but are experiencing their first ride in the Chicago League... The talent is too deep and the Teams too good to really go on long winning - streaks.

Likes of Sanchez, Ozil and most important Chelsea don't have any passer from deep Midfield, Matic and Kante are certainly good defensively but we have to accept that Xhaka is much advance in compared to that duo... His eye for pass and passing is very good... So we can drive our attack from Midfield too I think Ramsey should start along side Xhaka....

Lacazette comes in deep too much and its not that too good.

I don't see Ramsey or Wilshire as good enough (too gung ho) to play either deeper role and I think Xhaka is the best option at the moment until Santi is available, but he needs a real DM alongside him.

I don't think Lacazette9 is not good enough, I think Arsenal as a team plays too deep Auba14 too played against Spurs and he didn't do nothing for 90 mins.

However, there are instances where he finds himself too deep into the opposition half and although nothing comes of it because he's well covered by Benfica's defensive midfielder, the space he leaves behind would be very prone to teams in the Premier League who specialises in absorbing attacks and hit opponents in the counter.